第一篇：兩岸刑事實體法差異對合作打擊跨境犯罪之影響及對之英文

兩岸刑事實體法差異對合作打擊跨境犯罪之影響及對策

陳茂華

（福建警察學(xué)院法律系，福建 福州 350007）

內(nèi)容摘要：《兩岸司法互助協(xié)議》是兩岸合作打擊跨境犯罪的法律框架。兩岸合作打擊跨境犯罪的成效不僅受兩岸刑事程序法影響，而且受兩岸刑事實體法影響。兩岸刑事實體法律差異下的罪名差異、同質(zhì)異罪、同罪異罰等問題已帶來司法互助中的管轄爭議、合作懈怠、法公平性的損害等負面作用，并有形成兩岸“犯罪洼地”之趨勢。應(yīng)經(jīng)由“合作范圍”去罪名化、商定兩岸互涉犯罪之管轄條款以及自由裁量下的刑罰趨近等對策和路徑，減少兩岸刑事實體法差異的負面影響，以提升兩岸合作打擊跨境犯罪之成效。

關(guān)鍵詞：司法互助；跨境犯罪；刑事實體法；差異；合作

The Differences of Criminal Law’s Impact on Cooperating Attack Cross-strait Crimes and Countermeasure

CHEN Mao-hua(Law Department of Fujian Police College, Fuzhou 350007,China)

Abstract: Agreements on Mutual Judicial Assistance and Cracking down on Crimes Across the Straits is the legal framework for cross-strait cooperation in combating trans-border crime.The effect of cross strait cooperation in combating transnational crime is not only determined by the criminal procedure law, but also by the criminal law.The differences of criminal law such as accusation of a charge, constitution of a crime, and the penalty attached a crime et al issues have brought the problems include jurisdiction dispute, negative cooperation, justification impairment, even with the trend of forming the“ crime depressions ” across strait.With respect to minimize the negative effect of criminal law divergence, and improve the effect of cooperating attacking crimes, the cooperation scope should not be determined by the accusation, the jurisdiction issues arisen by cross-border crimes should be negotiated, and the difference of penalty should be minimized as soon as possible.Key words: mutual legal assistance;cross-border crime;criminal law;differences;cooperation