第一篇：高中英語(yǔ)演講稿:我的分?jǐn)?shù)觀

My Attitude towards to Marks 我的分?jǐn)?shù)觀

For our students, marks is above everything.Teachers will judge us from our marks.With marks we can be enrolled into junior middle schools.With marks, we can be enrolled into senior middle schools.With marks we can be enrolled into college.With marks we can be enrolled into postgraduate and doctrine studies.Still with marks we can be graded and be allowed to go abroad for further studies.Our parents will be strict with us with the marks.Our society judge us from marks.However, sometimes we students compare one another with marks directly.We are completely controlled by marks.We like them and we feel sorry for them.But what attitude towards our marks should we take?

Truly, marks functions cannot be underestimated.In terms of test in our study, marks are fair and real.That is the reason why we say “Everyone is equal before marks.”

However, I think marks are the sole standard to judge the success or failure of students in exams.Sometimes, marks more than ten or less than one or two in our exams comparing with others mean not everything.The success or failure in exams will be influenced by experience on the spot and the examinee's health etc.Once in a while one cannot fail in exams.“ Success or failure is common sense for military.” I think everyone is familiar with the famous saying.Don't you think such will be the case with our study? In exams, one cannot be “ never-defeated general”.Even though one will be very good in everyday study, he cannot succeed in every exam sometimes.We can get proof from the fact that the very best one we call “Number One Scholar” in the entrance exams for college and ordinary middle school and specialized secondary school over the years is not eminent above all others nor top student in every study.As a matter of fact, “high marks” and “ability” are not unified.Some time ago, a new phrase “ high marks but poor competence” came into being.Once I happened to meet such a teacher as this.It is said that the teacher just graduated from a far-famed key university.But his teaching result is much less than that of the one who just graduated from a not-well-renowned college.When lecturing, the teacher only repeated what the text-books says, which was very dull so the his students' interest in learning was not aroused.His teaching was short of unity of teaching and learning.At present there is a fact that we know a few brilliant and top college graduates are not qualified for their posts.The reason for it may be lack of the ability to combine knowledge learnt from books with pragmatics in their work.Students of this kind will be successful in every exam but they will be able to use freely their knowledge in their posts.Don't you think it waste training such persons for the country?

To sum up from the above, I can say marks are not absolutely authoritative for some.If we neglect training and developing the students' ability and competence and if we only seek for the high marks, we will be absolutely wrong.We should take an objective attitude towards the marks.Neither should we neglect them nor should we overvalue them like a God.分?jǐn)?shù)，對(duì)于我們學(xué)生來(lái)說(shuō)，是至關(guān)重要的了。老師要用分?jǐn)?shù)來(lái)衡量我們—上初中，要分?jǐn)?shù);上高中，要分?jǐn)?shù);上

大學(xué)要分?jǐn)?shù)，考研究生、博士要分?jǐn)?shù)，出國(guó)、評(píng)職稱(chēng)還是要分?jǐn)?shù)。家長(zhǎng)要用分?jǐn)?shù)來(lái)要求我們;社會(huì)用分?jǐn)?shù)來(lái)衡量我們。

而我們自己也常常用分?jǐn)?shù)在相互直接做著攀比。我們完全為分?jǐn)?shù)所左右了，我們?yōu)樗鼩g喜，我們?yōu)樗鼏蕷?。那么，我們?yīng)該怎樣對(duì)待分?jǐn)?shù)呢?

的確，分?jǐn)?shù)有它不可低估的作用。從檢驗(yàn)學(xué)習(xí)的角度上來(lái)說(shuō)，它具有一定的公平性和真實(shí)性，“分?jǐn)?shù)面前人人平

等”，講的就是這個(gè)道理。然而，分?jǐn)?shù)并不是估量一個(gè)學(xué)生成敗得失的惟一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。考試成績(jī)偶爾低了一兩分乃至十來(lái)

分，并不一定說(shuō)明什么問(wèn)題。考試的成敗有時(shí)也會(huì)受到諸如臨場(chǎng)經(jīng)驗(yàn)、健康狀況等方面的影響?！皠贁∧耸潜页Ｊ隆边@句話(huà)大概不會(huì)有人不知道，而我們?cè)趯W(xué)習(xí)上又何嘗不如此?在考試上很少有“常勝之師”，即使平時(shí)成績(jī)?cè)俸玫耐?/p>

學(xué)，也難免會(huì)有偶爾的失誤。歷屆中考、高考“狀元”并非就是平時(shí)出類(lèi)拔萃的優(yōu)等生的事實(shí)，便是明證。

事實(shí)上，“高分”與“能力”往往是不統(tǒng)一的。前段時(shí)間，社會(huì)上出現(xiàn)了一個(gè)新詞:“高分低能”。筆者就曾經(jīng)碰見(jiàn)這樣一位教師，據(jù)說(shuō)他畢業(yè)于某赫赫有名的重點(diǎn)大學(xué)，但從教學(xué)效果上講，卻遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)遜色于一些非高等學(xué)府畢業(yè)的老師。其授課只是照本宣讀而已，枯燥乏味，缺乏一種教與學(xué)之間的協(xié)調(diào)功能。根本不能引起聽(tīng)課同學(xué)的興趣，目前不少大中專(zhuān)院校的高材生畢業(yè)后不能勝任他們的工作，原因就在于缺少將書(shū)本中的知識(shí)運(yùn)用到實(shí)際工作中去的能力。這種人，盡管在學(xué)校中每每能考出高分，可無(wú)法在工作崗位上靈活白如地運(yùn)用自己所學(xué)到的知識(shí)。國(guó)家培養(yǎng)出這樣的“人材”，不也是一種浪費(fèi)嗎?

由此可見(jiàn)，分?jǐn)?shù)并不如有些人想象得那么絕對(duì)和權(quán)威，忽視了對(duì)各方面才能的培養(yǎng)，只一味追求高分，是不行的。因此，我們應(yīng)該客觀地去看待分?jǐn)?shù)，既不應(yīng)過(guò)分輕視它，也沒(méi)有必要把它看得過(guò)于神圣。

第二篇：英語(yǔ)演講稿——我的分?jǐn)?shù)觀

英語(yǔ)演講稿——我的分?jǐn)?shù)觀(精選多

篇)

forourstudents,marksisaboveeverything.teacherswilljudgeusfromourmarks.withmarkswecanbeenrolledintojuniormiddleschools.withmarks,wecanbeenrolledintoseniormiddleschools.withmarkswecanbeenrolledintocollege.withmarkswecanbeenrolledintopostgraduateanddoctrinestudies.stillwithmarkswecanbegradedandbeallowedtogoabroadforfurtherstudies.ourparentswillbestrictwithuswiththemarks.oursocietyjudgeusfrommarks.however,sometimeswestudentscompareoneanotherwithmarksdirectly.wearecompletelycontrolledbymarks.welikethemandwefe

elsorryforthem.butwhatattitudetowardsourmarksshouldwetake？

truly,marksfunctionscannotbeunderestimated.intermsoftestinourstudy,marksarefairandreal.thatisthereasonwhywesay”everyoneisequalbeforemarks.”

however,ithinkmarksarethesolestandardtojudgethesuccessorfailureofstudentsinexams.sometimes,marksmorethantenorlessthanoneortwoinourexamscomparingwithothersmeannoteverything.thesuccessorfailureinexamswillbeinfluencedbyexperienceonthespotandtheexaminee’shealthetc.onceinawhileonecannotfailinexams.”successorfailureiscommonsenseformilitary.”ithinkeveryoneisfamiliarwiththefamoussaying.don’tyouthinksuchwillbethecasewithourstudy？inexams,onecannotbe”never-defeatedgener

al”.eventhoughonewillbeverygoodineverydaystudy,hecannotsucceedineveryexamsometimes.wecangetprooffromthefactthattheverybestonewecall”numberonescholar”intheentranceexamsforcollegeandordinarymiddleschoolandspecializedsecondaryschoolovertheyearsisnoteminentaboveallothersnortopstudentineverystudy.asamatteroffact,”highmarks”and”ability”arenotunified.sometimeago,anewphrase”highmarksbutpoorcompetence”cameintobeing.onceihappenedtomeetsuchateacherasthis.itissaidthattheteacherjustgraduatedfromafar-famedkeyuniversity.buthisteachingresultismuchlessthanthatoftheonewhojustgraduatedfromanot-well-renownedcollege.whenlecturing,theteacheronlyrepeatedwhatthetext-bookssays,whichwasverydullsothehisstudents’interestinlearningwasnotaroused.histeachingwasshortofunityofteachingandlearning.at

presentthereisafactthatweknowafewbrilliantandtopcollegegraduatesarenotqualifiedfortheirposts.thereasonforitmaybelackoftheabilitytocombineknowledgelearntfrombookswithpragmaticsintheirwork.studentsofthiskindwillbesuccessfulineveryexambuttheywillbeabletousefreelytheirknowledgeintheirposts.don’tyouthinkitwastetrainingsuchpersonsforthecountry？

tosumupfromtheabove,icansaymarksarenotabsolutelyauthoritativeforsome.ifweneglecttraininganddevelopingthestudents’abilityandcompetenceandifweonlyseekforthehighmarks,wewillbeabsolutelywrong.weshouldtakeanobjectiveattitudetowardsthemarks.neithershouldweneglectthemnorshouldweovervaluethemlikeagod.my attitude towards to marks 我的分?jǐn)?shù)觀

for our students, marks is above

everything.teachers will judge us from our marks.with marks we can be enrolled into junior middle schools.with marks, we can be enrolled into senior middle schools.with marks we can be enrolled into college.with marks we can be enrolled into postgraduate and doctrine studies.still with marks we can be graded and be allowed to go abroad for further studies.our parents will be strict with us with the marks.our society judge us from marks.however, sometimes we students compare one another with marks directly.we are completely controlled by marks.we like them and we feel sorry for them.but what attitude towards our marks should we take?

truly, marks functions cannot be underestimated.in terms of test in our study, marks are fair and real.that is the reason why we say “everyone is equal before marks.“

however, i think marks are the sole

standard to judge the success or failure of students in exams.sometimes, marks more than ten or less than one or two in our exams comparing with others mean not everything.the success or failure in exams will be influenced by experience on the spot and the examinee’s health etc.once in a while one cannot fail in exams.“ success or failure is common sense for military.“ i think everyone is familiar with the famous saying.don’t you think such will be the case with our study? in exams, one cannot be “ never-defeated general”.even though one will be very good in everyday study, he cannot succeed in every exam sometimes.we can get proof from the fact that the very best one we call “number one scholar” in the entrance exams for college and ordinary middle school and specialized secondary school over the years is not eminent above all others nor top student in every study.as a matter of fact, “high marks” and “ability” are not unified.some time ago, a new phrase “ high marks but poor competence” came into being.once i happened to meet such a teacher as this.it is said that the teacher just graduated from a far-famed key university.but his teaching result is much less than that of the one who just graduated from a not-well-renowned college.when lecturing, the teacher only repeated what the text-books says, which was very dull so the his students’ interest in learning was not aroused.his teaching was short of unity of teaching and learning.at present there is a fact that we know a few brilliant and top college graduates are not qualified for their posts.the reason for it may be lack of the ability to combine knowledge learnt from books with pragmatics in their work.students of this kind will be successful in every exam but they will be

able to use freely their knowledge in their posts.don’t you think it waste training such persons for the country?

to sum up from the above, i can say marks are not absolutely authoritative for some.if we neglect training and developing the students’ ability and competence and if we only seek for the high marks, we will be absolutely wrong.we should take an objective attitude towards the marks.neither should we neglect them nor should we overvalue them like a god.分?jǐn)?shù)，對(duì)于我們學(xué)生來(lái)說(shuō)，是至關(guān)重要的了。老師要用分?jǐn)?shù)來(lái)衡量我們—上初中，要分?jǐn)?shù);上高中，要分?jǐn)?shù);上

大學(xué)要分?jǐn)?shù)，考研究生、博士要分?jǐn)?shù)，出國(guó)、評(píng)職稱(chēng)還是要分?jǐn)?shù)。家長(zhǎng)要用分?jǐn)?shù)來(lái)要求我們;社會(huì)用分?jǐn)?shù)來(lái)衡量我們。

而我們自己也常常用分?jǐn)?shù)在相互直接做著攀比。我們完全為分?jǐn)?shù)所左右

了，我們?yōu)樗鼩g喜，我們?yōu)樗鼏蕷?。那么，我們?yīng)該怎樣對(duì)待分?jǐn)?shù)呢? 的確，分?jǐn)?shù)有它不可低估的作用。從檢驗(yàn)學(xué)習(xí)的角度上來(lái)說(shuō)，它具有一定的公平性和真實(shí)性，“分?jǐn)?shù)面前人人平

等”，講的就是這個(gè)道理。然而，分?jǐn)?shù)并不是估量一個(gè)學(xué)生成敗得失的惟一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)?？荚嚦煽?jī)偶爾低了一兩分乃至十來(lái)

分，并不一定說(shuō)明什么問(wèn)題?？荚嚨某蓴∮袝r(shí)也會(huì)受到諸如臨場(chǎng)經(jīng)驗(yàn)、健康狀況等方面的影響?！皠贁∧耸潜页Ｊ隆边@句話(huà)大概不會(huì)有人不知道，而我們?cè)趯W(xué)習(xí)上又何嘗不如此?在考試上很少有“常勝之師”，即使平時(shí)成績(jī)?cè)俸玫耐?/p>

學(xué)，也難免會(huì)有偶爾的失誤。歷屆中考、高考“狀元”并非就是平時(shí)出類(lèi)拔萃的優(yōu)等生的事實(shí)，便是明證。

事實(shí)上，“高分”與“能力”往往是不統(tǒng)一的。前段時(shí)間，社會(huì)上出現(xiàn)了一個(gè)新詞:“高分低能”。筆者就曾經(jīng)碰見(jiàn)這樣一位教師，據(jù)說(shuō)他畢業(yè)于某赫赫有名的

重點(diǎn)大學(xué)，但從教學(xué)效果上講，卻遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)遜色于一些非高等學(xué)府畢業(yè)的老師。其授課只是照本宣讀而已，枯燥乏味，缺乏一種教與學(xué)之間的協(xié)調(diào)功能。根本不能引起聽(tīng)課同學(xué)的興趣，目前不少大中專(zhuān)院校的高材生畢業(yè)后不能勝任他們的工作，原因就在于缺少將書(shū)本中的知識(shí)運(yùn)用到實(shí)際工作中去的能力。這種人，盡管在學(xué)校中每每能考出高分，可無(wú)法在工作崗位上靈活白如地運(yùn)用自己所學(xué)到的知識(shí)。國(guó)家培養(yǎng)出這樣的“人材”，不也是一種浪費(fèi)嗎?

由此可見(jiàn)，分?jǐn)?shù)并不如有些人想象得那么絕對(duì)和權(quán)威，忽視了對(duì)各方面才能的培養(yǎng)，只一味追求高分，是不行的。因此，我們應(yīng)該客觀地去看待分?jǐn)?shù)，既不應(yīng)過(guò)分輕視它，也沒(méi)有必要把它看得過(guò)于神圣。

my attitude towards to marks

for our students, marks is above everything.teachers will judge us from our marks.with marks we can be enrolled into

junior middle schools.with marks, we can be enrolled into senior middle schools.with marks we can be enrolled into college.with marks we can be enrolled into postgraduate and doctrine studies.still with marks we can be graded and be allowed to go abroad for further studies.our parents will be strict with us with the marks.our society judge us from marks.however, sometimes we students compare one another with marks directly.we are completely controlled by marks.we like them and we feel sorry for them.but what attitude towards our marks should we take？

truly, marks functions cannot be underestimated.in terms of test in our study, marks are fair and real.that is the reason why we say “everyone is equal before marks.“

however, i think marks are the sole standard to judge the success or failure of

students in exams.sometimes, marks more than ten or less than one or two in our exams comparing with others mean not everything.the success or failure in exams will be influenced by experience on the spot and the examinee’s health etc.once in a while one cannot fail in exams.“ success or failure is common sense for military.“ i think everyone is familiar with the famous saying.don’t you think

such will be the case with our study？ in exams, one cannot be “ never-defeated general”.even though one will be very good in everyday study, he cannot succeed in every exam sometimes.we can get proof from the fact that the very best one we call “number one scholar” in the entrance exams for college and ordinary middle school and specialized secondary school over the years is not eminent above all others nor top student in every study.as a matter of fact, “high marks” and “ability” are not unified.some time ago, a new phrase “ high marks but poor competence” came into being.once i happened to meet such a teacher as this.it is said that the teacher just graduated from a far-famed key university.but his teaching result is much less than that of the one who just graduated from a not-well-renowned college.when lecturing, the teacher only repeated what the text-books says, which was very dull so the his students’ interest in learning was not aroused.his teaching was short of unity of teaching and learning.at present there is a fact that we know a few brilliant and top college graduates are not qualified for their posts.the reason for it may be lack of the ability to combine knowledge learnt from books with pragmatics in their work.students of this kind will be successful in every exam but they will be

able to use freely their knowledge in their posts.don’t you think it waste training such persons for the country？

to sum up from the above, i can say marks are not absolutely authoritative for some.if we neglect training and developing the students’ ability and competence and if we only seek for the high marks, we will be absolutely wrong.we should take an objective attitude towards the marks.neither should we neglect them nor should we overvalue them like a god.我們于2014年在陽(yáng)朔也開(kāi)辦了一所英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)培訓(xùn)學(xué)校，叫陽(yáng)朔大戶(hù)外口語(yǔ)拓展基地。首先我們認(rèn)為陽(yáng)朔的英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境是全國(guó)最好的，加上風(fēng)景秀美，中外游人云集，這里就形成了一個(gè)外來(lái)文化與本地文化完美交融的自在生活圈。在這里學(xué)習(xí)英語(yǔ)的學(xué)員，有一些是半學(xué)習(xí)半度假的；有一些則學(xué)習(xí)目的非常明確。經(jīng)過(guò)三五個(gè)月的學(xué)習(xí)，他們目

標(biāo)達(dá)到了，在滿(mǎn)腹成就感的同時(shí)一定還會(huì)感到非常輕松快樂(lè)！

這里的輕松自如，也許更適合突破我們?cè)趯W(xué)習(xí)一門(mén)新語(yǔ)言時(shí)的障礙吧！

如：不敢開(kāi)口，沒(méi)有一個(gè)自己感興趣的練習(xí)對(duì)象，發(fā)音不準(zhǔn)，沒(méi)有形成英語(yǔ)表達(dá)思維，太中國(guó)化，沒(méi)有真正地了解外國(guó)文化等等這些口語(yǔ)問(wèn)題。這些問(wèn)題的解決在陽(yáng)朔的大環(huán)境也許要比其它地方要好些。

記得2014年大學(xué)畢業(yè)，在深圳工作了兩年多，當(dāng)時(shí)也是有一定的英語(yǔ)基礎(chǔ)，可是口語(yǔ)很不好的，偶然的一次機(jī)會(huì)和兩位丹麥的老外去賀州的黃姚古鎮(zhèn)，硬著頭皮做“翻譯”，臨時(shí)上陣要從腦袋里“收、擠”想說(shuō)的單詞，不斷地篩選，幾個(gè)小時(shí)和外國(guó)人“呆”下來(lái)，腦袋都快要爆炸了。不過(guò)在第二次和外國(guó)人外出時(shí)，卻是發(fā)現(xiàn)了我的英語(yǔ)表達(dá)速度比以前快了很多。于是在想，“在自然的語(yǔ)言環(huán)境下學(xué)習(xí)英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)，應(yīng)該是最快最好的吧？”，抱著這種啟蒙想法，兩年

后便和外國(guó)人在陽(yáng)朔西街附近開(kāi)辦了有自己特色的大戶(hù)外口語(yǔ)拓展基地，我們嘗試著去忘記了傳統(tǒng)的“教說(shuō)與記憶”，“板凳和黑板”，“考試加考試，，”

當(dāng)然，這并不是說(shuō)我們大戶(hù)外就一定完美。只是可以說(shuō)學(xué)校沒(méi)有好壞之分，適合你的就是最好的。陽(yáng)朔的外國(guó)人多，大多數(shù)是游客，也有為數(shù)不少的好英語(yǔ)外國(guó)教師，好的外教是教練，而不只是意識(shí)上的陪練。我們的學(xué)習(xí)，既需要課堂上的教練，也需要課外的陪練！所以，我們大戶(hù)外充分利用陽(yáng)朔的天時(shí)地利，并沒(méi)有刻意去創(chuàng)造限制學(xué)員空間的“全封閉”課堂，而是教導(dǎo)學(xué)員順其自然、盡情地在生活中運(yùn)用，快樂(lè)地笑談… …

我的班主任觀

**市萬(wàn)州區(qū)茨竹中心小學(xué)xxx

尊敬的各位領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、各位老師：

大家好！我xxx，來(lái)自茨竹小學(xué)。綿綿春雨早已送走那柳絮飛花，在這粽子飄香、石榴花依然爛漫的今天，我們相聚于此，我心里非常激動(dòng)。感謝這次

競(jìng)賽給了我一次鍛煉的機(jī)會(huì)，我相信，我的演講會(huì)給大家?guī)?lái)驚喜與激動(dòng)。我任教21年，有著21年的班主任經(jīng)歷，曾在《德育報(bào)》、《班主任》、《三峽教育》上發(fā)表過(guò)班級(jí)管理的相關(guān)論文。同時(shí)，也使我在班主任這個(gè)崗位上逐漸成熟起來(lái)。

回想起自己以前一味的清高卻不知在別人偽善的背后暗藏排擠，更何況我的不屑與懶惰更是一種消極，木然地覺(jué)得是非成敗只不過(guò)是因果輪回。那往往是不經(jīng)意的無(wú)心之矢，終會(huì)徹底消失?？擅慨?dāng)我看到珍藏著的厚厚的留言本和來(lái)信，不禁心潮澎湃，那是我送走的一屆又一屆畢業(yè)生對(duì)我的依依不舍和沉甸甸的祝福啊。這讓我想起小時(shí)候的一位班主任來(lái)。

30年前，我剛10歲，全鄉(xiāng)同年級(jí)排名前20人組成一個(gè)“尖子班”，由學(xué)校派個(gè)年輕的公辦老師包班給我們上課，何心平老師自然就成了我們的班主任。可他呢？說(shuō)我們是優(yōu)秀者，一進(jìn)教室就

叫我們自學(xué)，自己卻偷偷溜出去，夏天在學(xué)校邊的池塘釣魚(yú)，冬天去鐵爐旁烤火，很少來(lái)關(guān)心我們，也不和我們交流。日復(fù)一日，月復(fù)一月，窗外的梧桐葉由綠變黃，乃至飄落殆盡，我們?cè)诜e雪滿(mǎn)地的嚴(yán)冬里艱難的進(jìn)行了期末考試，其結(jié)果可想而知。第二學(xué)期父母將我轉(zhuǎn)

到普通班，他聲色俱厲的說(shuō)：“有的人陽(yáng)奉陰違，說(shuō)我教得不好，還當(dāng)了叛徒轉(zhuǎn)了班??”同學(xué)們“唰”地全把目光聚到我身上，我頓時(shí)覺(jué)得腦子里“哄”的一聲，趴在課桌上低低地抽泣起來(lái)。以至于后面一大堆難聽(tīng)的話(huà)，我什么也沒(méi)聽(tīng)見(jiàn)了。叛徒！雜種！飯桶！譏諷，挖苦，嘲笑，侮辱等等，猶如芒刺在背，萬(wàn)顆鋼針穿心，我的淚在流，我的心在絞痛，在滴血。這就是我第一眼看見(jiàn)的所謂廣博多聞?dòng)诛L(fēng)度翩翩的老師啊。卻給我幼小而純真的童心里留下一道深深的傷痕，永遠(yuǎn)也無(wú)法抹掉的隱痛。

而今身為人師的我，依舊無(wú)法忘卻這道傷痕，我在不斷的反思著自己，絕

不做這樣的班主任。如何才能做好一名優(yōu)秀的班主任呢？要求我們有著對(duì)人類(lèi)的熱愛(ài)和博大的胸懷，對(duì)學(xué)生成長(zhǎng)的關(guān)懷和敬業(yè)奉獻(xiàn)的崇高精神，良好的文化素養(yǎng)，復(fù)合的知識(shí)結(jié)構(gòu)，在富有時(shí)代精神和科學(xué)理念指導(dǎo)下的教育能力和研究能力，在實(shí)踐中不斷形成和發(fā)展的教育智慧?？v觀浩如煙海的理論著述，當(dāng)今許多優(yōu)秀班主任的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)，使我明白，要有“三心”——事業(yè)心、愛(ài)心、童心；要有“二勁”——干勁、韌勁。要像對(duì)待葉尖上的露珠一樣，小心翼翼地保護(hù)學(xué)生的心靈。師德的至高境界是熱愛(ài)學(xué)生，而熱愛(ài)的極至則是寬容。寬容是水，是人生的一種境界，一種度量，一種涵養(yǎng)，更是一種品德。教師應(yīng)具有寬容與關(guān)愛(ài)，因?yàn)榭梢宰屩刎?fù)在寬容中釋放，讓心靈在寬容中凈化，讓生命在寬容中升華。不僅要有端莊的儀表，而且要有良好的心理品質(zhì)，做學(xué)生身心健康的保健醫(yī)生，做一盞能夠長(zhǎng)久地照耀學(xué)生一生道路的明燈。

謝謝大家！

第三篇：《我的分?jǐn)?shù)觀》英語(yǔ)演講稿

《我的分?jǐn)?shù)觀》英語(yǔ)演講稿

for our students, marks are above everything.teachers will judge us from our marks.with marks we can be enrolled into junior middle schools.with marks, we can be enrolled into senior middle schools.with marks we can be enrolled into college.with marks we can be enrolled into postgraduate and doctor studies.still with marks we can be graded and be allowed to go abroad for further studies.our parents will be strict with us with the marks.our society judges us from marks.however, sometimes we students compare one another with marks directly.we are completely controlled by marks.we like them and we feel sorry for them.but what attitude towards our marks should we take?

truly, marks functions cannot be underestimated.in terms of test in our study, marks are fair and real.that is the reason why we say, “everyone is equal before marks.”

however, i didnt think marks are the sole standard to judge the success or failure of studtens in exams.sometimes, marks more than ten or less than one or two in our exams comparing with others means not everything.the success or failure in exams will be influenced by experience on the spot and the examinees health etc.once in a while one cannot fail in exams.“success or failure is common for military.” i think everyone is familiar with the famous saying.dont you think such will be the case with our study? in exams, one cannot be “never-defeated general”.even though one will be very good in everyday study, he cannot succeed in every exam sometimes.we can get proof from the fact that the very best one we call “number one scholar” in the entrance exams for college and ordinary middle school and specialized secondary school over the years is not eminent above all others nor top student in every study.as a matter of fact, “high marks” and “ability” are not unified.some time ago, a new phrase “high marks but poor competence” came into being.once i happened to meet such a teacher as this.it is said that the teacher just graduated from a far-famed key university.but his teaching result is much less than that of the one who just graduated from a not-well-renowned college.when lecturing, the teacher only repeated what the textbook says, which was very dull, so the students interest in learning was not aroused.his teaching was short of unity of teaching and learning.at present there is a fact that we know a few brilliant and top colleges graduates are not qualified for their posts.the reason for it may be lack of the ability to combine knowledge learnt from books with pragmatics in their work.students of this kind will be successful in every exam but they wont be able to use freely their knowledge in their posts.dont you think it waste training such persons for the country?

from the above, i can say marks are not absolutely authoritative for some.if we neglect training and developing the students ability and competence and if we only seek for the high marks, we will be absolutely wrong.we should take an objective attitude towards the marks.neither should we neglect them nor should we overvalue them like a god.分?jǐn)?shù)，對(duì)于我們學(xué)生來(lái)說(shuō)，是至關(guān)重要的了。老師要用分?jǐn)?shù)來(lái)衡量我們──上初中要分?jǐn)?shù);上高中要分?jǐn)?shù);上大學(xué)要分?jǐn)?shù);考研究生、博士要分?jǐn)?shù);出國(guó)、評(píng)職稱(chēng)還是要分?jǐn)?shù)。家長(zhǎng)用分?jǐn)?shù)來(lái)要求我們，社會(huì)用分?jǐn)?shù)來(lái)衡量我們，而我們自己也常常用分?jǐn)?shù)在相互直接做著攀比。我們完全為分?jǐn)?shù)所左右了，我們?yōu)樗鼩g喜，我們?yōu)樗鼏蕷?。那么，我們?yīng)該怎樣對(duì)待分?jǐn)?shù)呢? 的確，分?jǐn)?shù)有它不可低估的作用。從檢驗(yàn)學(xué)習(xí)的角度上來(lái)說(shuō)，它具有一定的公平性和真實(shí)性，“分?jǐn)?shù)面前人人平等”講的就是這個(gè)道理。

然而，分?jǐn)?shù)并不是估量一個(gè)學(xué)生得失成敗的惟一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)?？荚嚦煽?jī)偶爾低了一兩分乃至十來(lái)分，并不一定說(shuō)明什么問(wèn)題?？荚嚨某蓴∮袝r(shí)也會(huì)受到諸如臨場(chǎng)經(jīng)驗(yàn)、健康狀況等方面的影響?！皠贁∧吮页Ｊ隆边@句話(huà)大概不會(huì)有人不知道，而我們?cè)趯W(xué)習(xí)上又何嘗不如此?在考慮上很少有“常勝之師”，即使平時(shí)成績(jī)?cè)俸玫耐瑢W(xué)，也難免會(huì)有偶爾的失誤。歷屆中考、高考“狀元”并非就是平時(shí)出類(lèi)拔萃的優(yōu)等生的事實(shí)，便是明證。

事實(shí)上，“高分”與“能力”往往是不統(tǒng)一的。前段時(shí)間，社會(huì)上出現(xiàn)了一個(gè)新詞“高分低能”。筆者就曾經(jīng)碰見(jiàn)這樣一位教師，據(jù)說(shuō)他畢業(yè)于某赫赫有名的重點(diǎn)大學(xué)，但從教學(xué)效果上講，卻遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)遜色于一些并非著名高等院校畢業(yè)的老師。其授課只是照本宣科而已，枯燥乏味，根本不能引起聽(tīng)課同學(xué)的學(xué)習(xí)興趣，缺乏一種教與學(xué)之間的協(xié)調(diào)功能。目前不少大專(zhuān)院校的高材生，畢業(yè)后不能勝任他們的工作，原因就在于缺少將書(shū)本中的知識(shí)運(yùn)用到實(shí)際工作中去的能力。這種人，盡管在學(xué)校中每每能考出高分，可無(wú)法在工作崗位上靈活自如地運(yùn)用自己所學(xué)到的知識(shí)。國(guó)家培養(yǎng)出這樣的“人才”，不也是一種浪費(fèi)嗎?

由此可見(jiàn)，分?jǐn)?shù)并不如有些人想像的那么絕對(duì)和權(quán)威，忽視了對(duì)各方面才能的培養(yǎng)，只一味追求高分，是不行的。因此，我們應(yīng)該客觀地去看待分?jǐn)?shù)，既不應(yīng)輕視它，也沒(méi)有必要把它看得過(guò)于神圣。

第四篇：英語(yǔ)演講稿——我的分?jǐn)?shù)觀

forourstudents,marksisaboveeverything.teacherswilljudgeusfromourmarks.withmarkswecanbeenrolledintojuniormiddleschools.withmarks,wecanbeenrolledintoseniormiddleschools.withmarkswecanbeenrolledintocollege.withmarkswecanbeenrolledintopostgraduateanddoctrinestudies.stillwithmarkswecanbegradedandbeallowedtogoabroadforfurtherstudies.ourparentswillbestrictwithuswiththemarks.oursocietyjudgeusfrommarks.however,sometimeswestudentscompareoneanotherwithmarksdirectly.wearecompletelycontrolledbymarks.welikethemandwefeelsorryforthem.butwhatattitudetowardsourmarksshouldwetake？

truly,marksfunctionscannotbeunderestimated.intermsoftestinourstudy,marksarefairandreal.thatisthereasonwhywesay“everyoneisequalbeforemarks.”

however,ithinkmarksarethesolestandardtojudgethesuccessorfailureofstudentsinexams.sometimes,marksmorethantenorlessthanoneortwoinourexamscomparingwithothersmeannoteverything.thesuccessorfailureinexamswillbeinfluencedbyexperienceonthespotandtheexaminee’shealthetc.onceinawhileonecannotfailinexams.“successorfailureiscommonsenseformilitary.”ithinkeveryoneisfamiliarwiththefamoussaying.don’tyouthinksuchwillbethecasewithourstudy？inexams,onecannotbe“never-defeatedgeneral”.eventhoughonewillbeverygoodineverydaystudy,hecannotsucceedineveryexamsometimes.wecangetprooffromthefactthattheverybestonewecall“numberonescholar”intheentranceexamsforcollegeandordinarymiddleschoolandspecializedsecondaryschoolovertheyearsisnoteminentaboveallothersnortopstudentineverystudy.asamatteroffact,“highmarks”and“ability”arenotunified.sometimeago,anewphrase“highmarksbutpoorcompetence”cameintobeing.onceihappenedtomeetsuchateacherasthis.itissaidthattheteacherjustgraduatedfromafar-famedkeyuniversity.buthisteachingresultismuchlessthanthatoftheonewhojustgraduatedfromanot-well-renownedcollege.whenlecturing,theteacheronlyrepeatedwhatthetext-bookssays,whichwasverydullsothehisstudents’interestinlearningwasnotaroused.histeachingwasshortofunityofteachingandlearning.atpresentthereisafactthatweknowafewbrilliantandtopcollegegraduatesarenotqualifiedfortheirposts.thereasonforitmaybelackoftheabilitytocombineknowledgelearntfrombookswithpragmaticsintheirwork.studentsofthiskindwillbesuccessfulineveryexambuttheywillbeabletousefreelytheirknowledgeintheirposts.don’tyouthinkitwastetrainingsuchpersonsforthecountry？

tosumupfromtheabove,icansaymarksarenotabsolutelyauthoritativeforsome.ifweneglecttraininganddevelopingthestudents’abilityandcompetenceandifweonlyseekforthehighmarks,wewillbeabsolutelywrong.weshouldtakeanobjectiveattitudetowardsthemarks.neithershouldweneglectthemnorshouldweovervaluethemlikeagod.

第五篇：我的分?jǐn)?shù)觀

My Attitude towards to Marks

for our students, marks is above everything.Teachers will judge us from our marks.with marks we can be enrolled into junior middle schools.with marks, we can be enrolled into senior middle schools.with marks we can be enrolled into college.with marks we can be enrolled into postgraduate and doctrine studies.still with marks we can be graded and be allowed to go abroad for further studies.our parents will be strict with us with the marks.our society judge us from marks.however, sometimes we students compare one another with marks directly.we are completely controlled by marks.we like them and we feel sorry for them.but what attitude towards our marks should we take？

truly, marks functions cannot be underestimated.in terms of test in our study, marks are fair and real.that is the reason why we say “everyone is equal before marks.”

however, i think marks are the sole standard to judge the success or failure of students in exams.sometimes, marks more than ten or less than one or two in our exams comparing with others mean not everything.the success or failure in exams will be influenced by experience on the spot and the examinee’s health etc.once in a while one cannot fail in exams.“ success or failure is common sense for military.” i think everyone is familiar with the famous saying.don’t you think

such will be the case with our study？ in exams, one cannot be “ never-defeated general”.even though one will be very good in everyday study, he cannot succeed in every exam sometimes.we can get proof from the fact that the very best one we call “number one scholar” in the entrance exams for college and ordinary middle school and specialized secondary school over the years is not eminent above all others nor top student in every study.as a matter of fact, “high marks” and “ability” are not unified.some time ago, a new phrase “ high marks but poor competence” came into being.once i happened to meet such a teacher as this.it is said that the teacher just graduated from a far-famed key university.but his teaching result is much less than that of the one who just graduated from a not-well-renowned college.when lecturing, the teacher only repeated what the text-books says, which was very dull so the his students’ interest in learning was not aroused.his teaching was short of unity of teaching and learning.at present there is a fact that we know a few brilliant and top college graduates are not qualified for their posts.the reason for it may be lack of the ability to combine knowledge learnt from books with pragmatics in their work.students of this kind will be successful in every exam but they will be able to use freely their knowledge in their posts.don’t you think it waste training such persons for the country？

to sum up from the above, i can say marks are not absolutely authoritative for some.if we neglect training and developing the students’ ability and competence and if we only seek for the high marks, we will be absolutely wrong.we should take an objective attitude towards the marks.neither should we neglect them nor should we overvalue them like a god.