第一篇：經(jīng)典英文演講100篇26-Every Man a King

Huey P.Long: “Every Man a King”

delivered 23 February 1934

Is that a right of life, when the young children of this country are being reared into a sphere which is more owned by 12 men that is is by 120,000,000 people? Ladies and gentlemen, I have only 30 minutes in which to speak to you this evening, and I, therefore, will not be able to discuss in detail so much as I can write when I have all of the time and space that is allowed me for the subjects, but I will undertake to sketch them very briefly without manuscript or preparation, so that you can understand them so well as I can tell them to you tonight.I contend, my friends, that we have no difficult problem to solve in America, and that is the view of nearly everyone with whom I have discussed the matter here in Washington and elsewhere throughout the United States--that we have no very difficult problem to solve.It is not the difficulty of the problem which we have;it is the fact that the rich people of this country--and by rich people I mean the super-rich--will not allow us to solve the problems, or rather the one little problem that is afflicting this country, because in order to cure all of our woes it is necessary to scale down the big fortunes, that we may scatter the wealth to be shared by all of the people.We have a marvelous love for this Government of ours;in fact, it is almost a religion, and it is well that it should be, because we have a splendid form of government and we have a splendid set of laws.We have everything here that we need, except that we have neglected the fundamentals upon which the American Government was principally predicated.How may of you remember the first thing that the Declaration of Independence said? It said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that there are certain inalienable rights of the people, and among them are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”;and it said, further, “We hold the view that all men are created equal.” Now, what did they mean by that? Did they mean, my friends, to say that all me were created equal and that that meant that any one man was born to inherit $10,000,000,000 and that another child was to be born to inherit nothing? Did that mean, my friends, that someone would come into this world without having had an opportunity, of course, to have hit one lick of work, should be born with more than it and all of its children and children's children could every dispose of, but that another one would have to be born into a life of starvation? That was not the meaning of the Declaration of Independence when it said that all men are created equal of “That we hold that all men are created equal.” Now was it the meaning of the Declaration of Independence when it said that they held that there were certain rights that were inalienable--the right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.Is that right of life, my friends, when the young children of this country are being reared into a sphere which is more owned by 12 men than it is by 120,000,000 people?

Is that, my friends, giving them a fair shake of the dice or anything like the inalienable right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, or anything resembling the fact that all people are created equal;when we have today in America thousands and hundreds of thousands and millions of children on the verge of starvation in a land that is overflowing with too much to eat and too much to wear? I do not think you will contend that, and I do not think for a moment that they will contend it.Now let us see if we cannot return this Government to the Declaration of Independence and see if we are going to do anything regarding it.Why should we hesitate or why should we quibble or why should we quarrel with one another to find out what the difficulty is, when we know what the Lord told us what the difficulty is, and Moses wrote it out so a blind man could see it, then Jesus told us all about it, and it was later written in the Book of James, where everyone could read it? I refer to the Scriptures, now, my friends, and give you what it says not for the purpose of convincing you of the wisdom of myself, not for the purpose ladies and gentlemen, of convincing you of the fact that I am quoting the Scripture means that I am to be more believed than someone else;but I quote you the Scripture, rather refer you to the Scripture, because whatever you see there you may rely upon will never be disproved so long as you or your children or anyone may live;and you may further depend upon the fact that not one historical fact that the Bible has ever contained has ever yet been disproved by any scientific discovery or by reason of anything that has been disclosed to man through his own individual mind or through the wisdom of the Lord which the Lord has allowed him to have.But the Scripture says, ladies and gentlemen, that no country can survive, or for a country to survive it is necessary that we keep the wealth scattered among the people, that nothing should be held permanently by any one person, and that 50 years seems to be the year of jubilee in which all property would be scattered about and returned to the sources from which it originally came, and every seventh year debt should be remitted.Those two things the Almighty said to be necessary--I should say He knew to be necessary, or else He would not have so prescribed that the property would be kept among the general run of the people and that everyone would continue to share in it;so that no one man would get half of it and hand it down to a son, who takes half of what was left, and that son hand it down to another one, who would take half of what was left, until, like a snowball going downhill, all of the snow was off of the ground except what the snowball had.I believe that was the judgment and the view and the law of the Lord, that we would have to distribute wealth every so often, in order that there could not be people starving to death in a land of plenty, as there is in America today.We have in American today more wealth, more goods, more food, more clothing, more houses than we have ever had.We have everything in abundance here.We have the farm problem, my friends, because we have too much cotton, because we have too much wheat, and have too much corn, and too much potatoes.We have a home-loan problem because we have too many houses, and yet nobody can buy them and live in them.We have trouble, my friends, in the country, because we have too much money owing, the greatest indebtedness that has every been given to civilization, where it has been shown that we are incapable of distributing to the actual things that are here, because the people have not money enough to supply themselves with them, and because the greed of a few men is such that they think it is necessary that they own everything, and their pleasure consists in the starvation of the masses, and in their possessing things they cannot use, and their children cannot use, but who bask in the splendor of sunlight and wealth, casting darkness and despair and impressing it on everyone else.“So, therefore,” said the Lord, in effect, “if you see these things that now have occurred and exist in this and other countries, there must be a constant scattering of wealth in any country if this country is to survive.”

“Then,” said the Lord, in effect, “every seventh year there shall be a remission of debts;there will be no debts after 7 years.” That was the law.Now, let us take America today.We have in American today, ladies and gentlemen, $272,000,000,000 of debt.Two hundred and seventy-two thousand millions of dollars of debts are owed by the various people of this country today.Why, my friends, that cannot be paid.It is not possible for that kind of debt to be paid.The entire currency of the United States is only $6,000,000,000.That is all of the money that we have got in America today.All the actual money you have got in all of your banks, all that you have got in the Government Treasury, is $6,000,000,000;and if you took all that money and paid it out today you would still owe $266,000,000,000;and if you took all that money and paid again you would still owe $260,000,000,000;and if you took it, my friends, 20 times and paid it you would still owe $150,000,000,000.You would have to have 45 times the entire money supply of the United States today to pay the debts of the people of America, and then they would just have to start out from scratch, without a dime to go on with.So, my friends, it is impossible to pay all of these debts, and you might as well find out that it cannot be done.The United States Supreme Court has definitely found out that it could not be done, because, in a Minnesota case, it held that when a State has postponed the evil day of collecting a debt it was a valid and constitutional exercise of legislative power.Now, ladies and gentlemen, if I may proceed to give you some other words that I think you can understand--I am not going to belabor you by quoting tonight--I am going to tell you what the wise men of all ages and all times, down even to the present day, have all said: That you must keep the wealth of the country scattered, and you must limit the amount that any one man can own.You cannot let any man own $300,000,000,000 or $400,000,000,000.If you do, one man can own all of the wealth that they United States has in it.Now, my friends, if you were off on an island where there were 100 lunches, you could not let one man eat up the hundred lunches, or take the hundred lunches and not let anybody else eat any of them.If you did, there would not be anything else for the balance of the people to consume.So, we have in America today, my friends, a condition by which about 10 men dominate the means of activity in at least 85 percent of the activities that you own.They either own directly everything or they have got some kind of mortgage on it, with a very small percentage to be excepted.They own the banks, they own the steel mills, they own the railroads, they own the bonds, they own the mortgages, they own the stores, and they have chained the country from one end to the other, until there is not any kind of business that a small, independent man could go into today and make a living, and there is not any kind of business that an independent man can go into and make any money to buy an automobile with;and they have finally and gradually and steadily eliminated everybody from the fields in which there is a living to be made, and still they have got little enough sense to think they ought to be able to get more business out of it anyway.If you reduce a man to the point where he is starving to death and bleeding and dying, how do you expect that man to get hold of any money to spend with you? It is not possible.They, ladies and gentlemen, how do you expect people to live, when the wherewith cannot be had by the people?

In the beginning I quoted from the Scriptures.I hope you will understand that I am not quoting Scripture to convince you of my goodness personally, because that is a thing between me and my Maker, that is something as to how I stand with my Maker and as to how you stand with your Maker.That is not concerned with this issue, except and unless there are those of you who would be so good as to pray for the souls of some of us.But the Lord gave his law, and in the Book of James they said so, that the rich should weep and howl for the miseries that had come upon them;and, therefore, it was written that when the rich hold goods they could not use and could not consume, you will inflict punishment on them, and nothing but days of woe ahead of them.Then we have heard of the great Greek philosopher, Socrates, and the greater Greek philosopher, Plato, and we have read the dialog between Plato and Socrates, in which one said that great riches brought on great poverty, and would be destructive of a country.Read what they said.Read what Plato said;that you must not let any one man be too poor, and you must not let any one man be too rich;that the same mill that grinds out the extra rich is the mill that will grind out the extra poor, because, in order that the extra rich can become so affluent, they must necessarily take more of what ordinarily would belong to the average man.It is a very simple process of mathematics that you do not have to study, and that no one is going to discuss with you.So that was the view of Socrates and Plato.That was the view of the English statesmen.That was the view of American statesmen.That was the view of American statesmen like Daniel Webster, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, William Jennings Bryan, and Theodore Roosevelt, and even as late as Herbert Hoover and Franklin D.Roosevelt.Both of these men, Mr.Hoover and Mr.Roosevelt, came out and said there had to be a decentralization of wealth, but neither one of them did anything about it.But, nevertheless, they recognized the principle.The fact that neither one of them ever did anything about it is their own problem that I am not undertaking to criticize;but had Mr.Hoover carried out what he says ought to be done, he would be retiring from the President's office, very probably, 3 years from now, instead of 1 year ago;and had Mr.Roosevelt proceeded along the lines that he stated were necessary for the decentralization of wealth, he would have gone, my friends, a long way already, and within a few months he would have probably reached a solution of all of the problems that afflict this country.But I wish to warn you now that nothing that has been done up to this date has taken one dime away from these big-fortune holders;they own just as much as they did, and probably a little bit more;they hold just as many of the debts of the common people as they ever held, and probably a little bit more;and unless we, my friends, are going to give the people of this country a fair shake of the dice, by which they will all get something out of the funds of this land, there is not a chance on the topside of this God's eternal earth by which we can rescue this country and rescue the people of this country.It is necessary to save the Government of the country, but is much more necessary to save the people of America.We love this country.We love this Government.It is a religion, I say.It is a kind of religion people have read of when women, in the name of religion, would take their infant babes and throw them into the burning flame, where they would be instantly devoured by the all-consuming fire, in days gone by;and there probably are some people of the world even today, who, in the name of religion, throw their tear-dimmed eyes into the sad faces of their fathers and mothers, who cannot given them food and clothing they both needed, and which is necessary to sustain them, and that goes on day after day, and night after night, when day gets into darkness and blackness, knowing those children would arise in the morning without being fed, and probably to to bed at night without being fed.Yet in the name of our Government, and all alone, those people undertake and strive as hard as they can to keep a good government alive, and how long they can stand that no one knows.If I were in their place tonight, the place where millions are, I hope that I would have what I might say--I cannot give you the word to express the kind of fortitude they have;that is the word--I hope that I might have the fortitude to praise and honor my Government that had allowed me here in this land, where there is too much to eat and too much to wear, to starve in order that a handful of men can have so much more than they can ever eat or they can ever wear.Now, we have organized a society, and we call it “Share Our Wealth Society,” a society with the motto “every man a king.”

Every man a king, so there would be no such thing as a man or woman who did not have the necessities of life, who would not be dependent upon the whims and caprices and ipsi dixit of the financial martyrs for a living.What do we propose by this society? we propose to limit the wealth of big men in the country.there is an average of $15,000 in wealth to every family in America.That is right here today.We do not propose to divide it up equally.we do not propose a division of wealth, but we propose to limit poverty that we will allow to be inflicted upon any man's family.we will not say we are going to try to guarantee any equality, or $15,000 to families.No;but we do say that one third of the average is low enough for any one family to hold, that there should be a guaranty of a family wealth of around $5,000;enough for a home, and automobile, a radio, and the ordinary conveniences, and the opportunity to educate their children;a fair share of the income of this land thereafter to that family so there will be no such thing as merely the select to have those things, and so there will be no such thing as a family living in poverty and distress.We have to limit fortunes.Our present plan is that we will allow no one man to own more than $50,000,000.We think that with that limit we will be able to carry out the balance of the program.It may be necessary that we limit it to less than $50,000,000.It may be necessary, in working out of the plans, that no man's fortune would be more than $10,000,00 or $15,000,000.But be that as it may, it will still be more than any one man, or any one man and his children and their children, will be able to spend in their lifetimes;and it is not necessary or reasonable to have wealth piled up beyond that point where we cannot prevent poverty among the masses.Another thing we propose is old-age pension of $30 a month for everyone that is 60 years old.Now, we do not give this pension to a man making $1,000 a year, and we do not give it to him if he has $10,000 in property, but outside of that we do.We will limit hours of work.There is not any necessity of having over-production.I think all you have got to do, ladies and gentlemen, is just limit the hours of work to such an extent as people will work only so long as is necessary to produce enough for all of the people to have what they need.Why, ladies and gentleman, let us say that all of these labor-saving devices reduce hours down to where you do not have to work but 4 hours a day;that is enough for these people, and then praise be the name of the Lord, if it gets that good.Let it be good and not a curse, and then we will have 5 hours a day and 5 days a week, or even less that that, and we might give a man a whole month off during a year, or give him 2 months;and we might do what other countries have seen fit to do, and what I did in Louisiana, by having schools by which adults could go back and learn the things that have been discovered since they went to school.We will not have any trouble taking care of the agricultural situation.All you have to do is balance your production with your consumption.You simply have to abandon a particular crop that you have too much of, and all you have to do is store the surplus for the next year, and the Government will take it over.When you have good crops in the area in which the crops that have been planted are sufficient for another year, put in your public works in the particular year when you do not need to raise any more, and by that means you get everybody employed.When the Government has enough of any particular crop to take care of all of the people, that will be all that is necessary;an in order to do all of this, our taxation is going to be to take the billion-dollar fortunes and strip them down to frying size, not to exceed $50,000,000, and it it is necessary to come to $10,000,000, we will come to $10,000,000.We have worked the proposition out to guarantee a limit upon property(and no man will own less than on third the average), and guarantee a reduction of fortunes and a reduction of hours to spread wealth throughout this country.We would care for the old people above 60 and take them away from this thriving industry and given them a chance to enjoy the necessities and live in ease, and thereby lift from the market the labor which would probably create s surplus of commodities.Those are the things we propose to do.“Every man a king.” Every man to eat when there is something to eat;all to wear something when there is something to wear.That makes us all sovereign.You cannot solve these things through these various and sundry alphabetical codes.You can have the N.R.A.and P.W.A.and C.W.A.and the U.U.G.and G.I.N.and any other kind of “dadgummed” lettered code.You can wait until doomsday and see 25 more alphabets, but that is not going to solve this proposition.Why hide? Why quibble? You know what the trouble is.The man that says he does not know what the trouble is is just hiding his face to keep from seeing the sunlight.God told you what the trouble was.The philosophers told you what the trouble was;and when you have a country where one man owns more than 100,000 people, or a million people, and when you have a country where there are four men, as in America, that have got more control over things than all the 120,000,000 people together, you know what the trouble is.We had these great incomes in this country;but the farmer, who plowed from sunup to sundown, who labored here from sunup to sundown for 6 days a week, wound up at the end of the with practically nothing.And we ought to take care of the veterans of the wars in this program.That is a small matter.Suppose it does cost a billion dollars a year--that means that the money will be scattered throughout this country.We ought to pay them a bonus.We can do it.We ought to take care of every single one of the sick and disabled veterans.I do not care whether a man got sick on the battlefield or did not;every man that wore the uniform of this country is entitled to be taken care of, and there is money enough to do it;and we need to spread the wealth of the country, which you did not do in what you call the N.R.A.If the N.R.A.has done any good, I can put it all in the my eye without having it hurt.All I can see that N.R.A.has done is to put the little man out business--the little merchant in his store, the little Dago that is running a fruit stand, or the Greek shoe-shining stand, who has to take hold of a code of 275 pages and study with a spirit level and compass and looking-glass;he has to hire a Philadelphia lawyer to tell him what is in the code;and by the time he learns what the code is, he is in jail or out of business;and they have got a chain code system that has already put him out of business.The N.R.A.is not worth anything, and I said so when they put it through.Now, my friends, we have got to hit the root with the axe.Centralized power in the hands of a few, with centralized credit in the hands of a few, is the trouble.Get together in your community tonight or tomorrow and organize one of our Share Our Wealth societies.If you do not understand it, write me and let me send your the platform;let me give you the proof of it.This is Huey P.Long talking, United States Senator, Washington, D.C.Write me and let me send you the data on this proposition.Enroll with us.Let us make known to the people what we are going to do.I will send you a button, if I have got enough of them left.We have got a little button that some of our friends designed, with our message around the rim of the button, and in the center “Every man a king.” Many thousands of them are meeting through the United States, and every day we are getting hundreds and hundreds of letters.Share Our Wealth societies are now being organized, and people have it within their power to relieve themselves from this terrible situation.Look at what the Mayo brothers announced this week, these greatest scientists of all the world today, who are entitled to have more money than all the Morgans and the Rockefellers, or anyone else, and yet the Mayos turn back their big fortunes to be used for treating the sick, and said they did not want to lay up fortunes in this earth, but wanted to turn them back where they would do some good;but the other big capitalists are not willing to do that, are not willing to do what these men, 10 times more worthy, have already done, and it is going to take a law to require them to do it.Organize your Share Our Wealth Society and get your people to meet with you, and make known your wishes to your Senators and Representatives in Congress.Now, my friends, I am going to stop.I thank you for this opportunity to talk to you.I am having to talk under the auspices and by the grace and permission of the National Broadcasting System tonight, and they are letting me talk free.If I had the money, and I wish I had the money, I would like to talk to you more often on this line, but I have not got it, and I cannot expect these people to give it to me free except on some rare instance.But, my friends, I hope to have the opportunity to talk with you, and I am writing to you, and I hope that you will get up and help in the work, because the resolution and bills are before Congress, and we hope to have your help in getting together and organizing your Share Our Wealth society.Now, that I have but a minute left, I want to say that I suppose my family is listening in on the radio in New Orleans, and I will say to my wife and three children that I am entirely well and hope to be home before many more days, and I hope they have listened to my speech tonight, and I wish them and all their neighbors and friends everything good that may be had.I thank you, my friends, for your kind attention, and I hope you will enroll with us, take care of your own work in the work of this Government, and share or help in our Share Our Wealth society.I thank you.

第二篇：英文演講

Ladies and Gentlemen, Good afternoon!I’m very glad to stand here and give you a speech.Hello!I wonder whether everybody knows the meaning of these two words of “energy-conservation ” and “ low carbon ”? I assume as a matter of course and know.Does “energy-conservation” save the energy? Does “l(fā)ow carbon” reduce carbon emission? Yes, it is really simple.We often chat about them.But, do you really understand them? Have they really taken root on your bottom of heart deeply?

Once, the Earth mother left our rich energy to cause us to be jubilant, sighed on Earth's energy inexhaustible, inexhaustible, now, the newest statistics indicated, the petroleum will dry up after 60 years, the coal also might supply the humanity to use for 250 years;Once, developed first, the environment question the situation which neglected is often occurred, now, the sustainable development, was together harmoniously with the nature the biggest topic.Not difficult to see, the environment question in is taken unceasingly by the people.For all this, the environment question was still stern, the energy conservation reduced the platoon, the low-carbon lives imminently.At the Copenhagen climate congress, this affects the human destiny the question slowly to be unable to reach the agreement actually.In the life, is driving the great displacement automobile, purchases including the fluorine air conditioning, the refrigerator, including the phosphorus laundry powder, turns on the air conditioning the low temperature also one side to bind in the summer the quilt, the daylight lamp is being long all night clearly, water cock water drop sound day and night not rest......These influence environment phenomenon common occurrence.This is rebels with ours position.American President Kennedy has said: Do not have to ask the country can

make any for us, must ask first oneself can make any for the country.The low-carbon life needs everybody to participation!

The low-carbon life first is one kind of life manner.So long as wants, each person may be able to achieve!The electricity saving, saves gas and oil, the solar terms, saving water, the tree-planting, makes use of waste, by step generation of vehicle......The intravenous drip, in life each aspect, all may choose the low-carbon life the manner.The low-carbon life is also representing one kind healthily, the more natural life style.Little eats counter-season food, the generation by works as season food;Little uses the disposable product, the generation by the duplicated things;Little rides an overhead traveling crane, little sits one time the elevator, the generation rides the bicycle, crawls the staircase, while falls the low-carbon withdrawal, we will have a healthier body and mind.We believed, so long as everybody works as one, participation together, humanity's tomorrow certainly will be able to be happier!Schoolmates, today, your low-carbon?

老師們、同學(xué)們：

大家好！不知大家是否知道“節(jié)能”和“低碳”這兩個詞的意思？我想當然知道?！肮?jié)能”不就是節(jié)約能源嗎？“低碳”不就是降低碳排放量嗎？是啊，的確簡單。我們經(jīng)常把它們掛在嘴邊?？墒?，你真的理解它們嗎？它們真的深深扎根在你的心底了嗎？

曾經(jīng)，地球母親留給我們豐富的能源使我們興高采烈，感嘆地球上的能源取之不盡，用之不竭，現(xiàn)在，最新統(tǒng)計表明，石油將在60年后枯竭，煤還可以供人類使用250年；曾經(jīng)，物資、能源的浪費多么猖獗，現(xiàn)在，“節(jié)約光榮，浪費可恥”成了新一代的口頭禪；曾經(jīng)，“發(fā)展第一”，環(huán)境問題被忽視的情況時常發(fā)生，現(xiàn)在，可持續(xù)發(fā)展，與大自然和諧相處成了最大的課題。不難看出，環(huán)境問題在不斷被人們重視。

盡管如此，環(huán)境問題仍然嚴峻，節(jié)能減排、低碳生活迫在眉睫。在哥本哈根氣候大會上，這一影響人類命運的問題卻遲遲無法達成協(xié)議。在生活中，開著大排量汽車，購買含氟空調(diào)、冰箱，含磷洗衣粉，夏天把空調(diào)開著低溫還一邊裹著被子，日光燈徹夜長明，水龍頭滴水聲日夜不息......，這些影響環(huán)境的現(xiàn)象屢見不鮮。這是與我們的主張所悖逆的。

如果整個社會是大海，每個人就是一滴水，大海的污染，影響著每一滴水，也需要每一滴水努力幫助凈化污染。美國總統(tǒng)肯尼迪說過：“不要問國家能為我們做些什么，先要問自己能為國家做些什么?！钡吞忌钚枰巳藚⑴c！

第三篇：經(jīng)典英文演講

美國20世紀經(jīng)典英語演講100篇（MP3+文本）

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

? ·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Farewell Address to Congress·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:1984 DNC Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:We Shall Overcome·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Shuttle’’Challenger’’Disaster Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Checkers·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:I Have a Dream·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Civil Rights Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:A Time to Break Silence-Beyond Vietnam·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:1988 DNC Keynote Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Atoms for Peace·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:The Truman Doctrine·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:First Inaugural Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:The Great Arsenal of Democracy·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Acres of Diamonds·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:The Great Silent Majority·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Farewell Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Oklahoma Bombing Memorial Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:A Crisis of Confidence·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:1992 DNC Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:On Vietnam and Not Seeking Re-Election·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Cambodian Incursion Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Eulogy for Robert Francis Kennedy·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Black Power·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Chappaquiddick·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:40th Anniversary of D-Day Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Presidential Nomination Acceptance..·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:The Marshall Plan·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:A Whisper of AIDS·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:1988 DNC Address(下)·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:I’ve Been to the Mountaintop·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Statement on the Articles of Impeachment·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:1984 DNC Keynote Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Houston Ministerial Association Speech·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:The Ballot or the Bullet·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:1976 DNC Keynote Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Inaugural Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Television News Coverage

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Against Imperialism·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:The Four Freedoms·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:American University Commencement Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:First Fireside Chat·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:The Evil Empire·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:A Time for Choosing·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Ich bin ein Berliner·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Duty, Honor, Country·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Remarks on the Assassination of MLKing·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Message to the Grassroots·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Address on Taking the Oath of Office·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Sproul Hall Sit-in Speech...·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:1980 DNC Address·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Statement to the Senate Judiciary...·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Television and the Public Interest·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Presidential Nomination...·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Religious Belief and Public Morality·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Vice-Presidential Nomination...·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Truth and Tolerance in America·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:The Great Society·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:1988 DNC Address(上)·美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇:Brandenburg Gate Address

第四篇：英文演講

Low-carbon is a buzzword these days, but the notion is no longer ambiguous for cities in China as the country selects five provinces and eight cities to make them the first batch of low-carbon pilot areas.Su Yi has the detail.The selected areas have promised to work out a low-carbon development plan to accelerate the establishment of a low carbon industry and promote people's low-carbon lifestyles.Lei Hongpeng, senior program officer of climate and energy programme with World Wide Fund for Nature, the world's largest conservation non-governmental organization, says the pilot project is a significant measure China has taken to deal with climate change.“Firstly, from a global perspective, we all know climate change is one of the biggest challenges the whole world is facing, I think China is one of the big emitters and also one of the countries who is affected by climate change, so China should do some thing to tackle climate change.The second is domestic perspective;China needs to explore a way to realize its development target, at the same time with limited sources and environment.”

The selected provinces are Guangdong, Liaoning, Hubei, Shaanxi and Yunnan, while the eight cities include Tianjin, Chongqing, Shenzhen, Xiamen, Hangzhou, Nanchang, Guiyang and Baoding.Lei Hongpeng explains the government's thinking behind choosing these places as the first batch of the pilot program.“I think from provincial level, the government selected these pilots mainly base on-every area, one province or municipality is selected.For example, northeast we have Liaoning province, north China we have Tianjin municipality and so on.For the cities, I think the governments really consider about capacity and their actions in the past several years, which mean the cities can go forward further with their strong experience and knowledge on low-carbon development.”

By the end of August, these provinces and cities have to submit their plan to the National Development and Reform Commission for approval.Xu Mindong, an official from the Development and Reform Commission of Hangzhou, talks about their plan.“Hangzhou started the preparation long ago, and we have an environmental advantage.The selected areas have their own unique features, some focus on new energy, some focus on ecological construction.Hangzhou's emphasis is on six aspects, including low carbon economy, environment, architecture, transportation and a low carbon society.”

The local governments in those areas have to manage to establish a data gathering system of greenhouse gas emissions, while combining the efforts of all their industries to achieve the goal of maintaining a low-carbon society.For CRI, Im Su Yi.值此第五屆中國投資貿(mào)易洽談會召開之際，我謹代表中國政府，向來自世界各地的嘉賓表示熱烈歡迎！自1997年以來，中國已經(jīng)成功地舉辦了四屆投資貿(mào)易洽談會。投資貿(mào)易洽談會在宣傳中國利用外資政策、促進外商來華投資、引導(dǎo)中國企業(yè)到海外投資等方面發(fā)揮了重要作用。

On the occasion of the Fifth China International Fair for Investment and Trade, I would like to extend, on behalf of the Chinese government, my warm welcome to all distinguished guests coming from all over the world.Since 1997, China has held four successful International Fairs for Investment and Trade.The Fair has played an important role in publicizing China’s policies on foreign investment attraction, promoting foreign capital inflow, and guiding Chinese companies to

make overseas investments.洽談會采取“引進來”與“走出去”相結(jié)合、投資與貿(mào)易相結(jié)合、展示與洽談相結(jié)合、項目推介與政策咨詢相結(jié)合、商務(wù)活動與學(xué)術(shù)研討相結(jié)合的方式。洽談會為海外朋友和企業(yè)家了解中國、走進中國，中國企業(yè)家了解世界、走向世界創(chuàng)造了一個機會，開辟了一條渠道。

The Fair integrates the strategy of “Attracting Foreign Investment” by “going global”, and deals with investment and trade together.It is combination of exhibitions and negotiations, a venue for both project presentation and policy consultation, and a place where business activities and academic seminars take place at the same time.The Fair has created an opportunity for foreign friends and entrepreneurs to know about China and make their way into this country;on the other hand, it has opened a new channel for Chinese businessmen to get acquainted with the rest of the world and go abroad.

第五篇：英文演講

演講稿一：

My understanding of Friendship

Good morning(or afternoon), my teachers and classmates!

Today, I would like to give a speech about ‘Friendship’.Friendship is important to us.Good friends are like gems.We all need friends.We cannot live in this world alone without friends.We need friends during our happy and sad times.They would share our joy and sadness with us.Good friends are always on our side to comfort and console us.They would provide us with encouragement.When we fall, good friends help us get back on our feet.My best friend is XXX.He is helpful and supportive, whenever I need a helping hand or a listening ear.I remember he helped me in my schoolwork.He helped me sweeping the classroom floor.And he also helped me a lot of other things.Of course I also helped him quite a lot.I wish to take this opportunity to say to XXX, let’s keep our friendship going on!Thank you!

演講稿二：

Good morning(or afternoon), my teachers and classmates!

The friend in need is a friend in deed 患難見真情

A life without friend is a life without sun!Many people will in and out of our life,but only true friend will leave footprints in our hearts.人生沒有朋友,猶如生活無太陽。很多人會在我們的生命出現(xiàn),但是只有真正的朋友會在我們的心里留下腳印。

They like the bright lights in the dark, accompaning with us through the fear and confusion, guiding us to the right way of a nice future.They try their best to help us without thinking what they can get from it.他們?nèi)缤诎抵忻髁恋年柟?，陪伴我們度過恐懼和困惑，指引我們走向正確的道路。他們盡他們最大的努力來幫助我們卻從不考慮他們能從中得到什么。

They like a warm coat in the rainy day, giving us strength to getting rid of dilemma, embracing us with big arms.They convince us that nothing is hard to conquer as long as they are with us.他們?nèi)缤掠晏斓臏嘏馓?，給我們力量去擺脫困境，用他們寬大的臂膀來擁抱我們。

他們讓我們知道只要有他們在身邊沒有什么是不能戰(zhàn)勝的。

They like a rule to point out our shortcomings, just hoping us to present best in front of others.The man who tells your faults is the one who really cares about you.他們?nèi)缤话褬顺咧赋鑫覀兩砩系娜秉c，只是希望我們能在其他人面前表現(xiàn)出最好的自己。能夠指出你身上不足的人才是真正關(guān)心你的人。

An ordinary friend has never seen your tears,but a real friend has shoulders for you to dilute your tears.An ordinary friend will take a bottle of wine to your part, but a real friend will come early to help you prepare,and go back late to help you tidy.An ordinary friend call you to talk about your trouble, but a real friend call you to handle your trouble 一個普通的朋友從未看過你流淚,但一個真正的朋友卻給你肩膀讓你依靠。一個普通的朋友會帶瓶葡萄酒參加你的派對,但一個真正的朋友會最早一個來幫你準備，最晚一個走來幫你收拾殘局。一個普通的朋友打電話給你聊聊你的麻煩,但一個真正的朋友告訴你怎么樣處理你的煩惱。

If you establish your friendship when you are in trouble, please cherish it.Otherwise when you lose it, you will find that how important it is.如果你在困難的時候建立起這份友誼的，請珍惜它，否則當你失去的時候，你會發(fā)現(xiàn)它是多么的重要。

演講稿三（詩歌）：

A forever friend 永遠的朋友

A friend walk in when the rest of the world walks out.別人都走開的時候，朋友仍與你在一起?！?/p>

Sometimes in life，有時候在生活中，you find a special friend，你會找到一個特別的朋友;，someone who changes your life just by being part of it.他只是你生活中的一部分內(nèi)容，卻能改變你整個的生活。

someone who makes you laugh until you cant stop;

他會把你逗得開懷大笑；

someone who makes you believe that there really is good in the world.他會讓你相信人間有真情。

someone who convinces you that there really is an unlocked door just waiting for you to open it.他會讓你確信，真的有一扇不加鎖的門，在等待著你去開啟。

This is forever friendship.這就是永遠的友誼。

When you’re down，當你失意，and the world seems dark and empty，當世界變得黯淡與空虛，your forever friend lifts you up in spirits and makes that dark and empty world suddenly seem bright and full.你真正的朋友會讓你振作起來，原本黯淡、空虛的世界頓時變得明亮和充實。

your forever friend gets you through the hard times, the sad times, and the confused times.你真正的朋友會與你一同度過困難、傷心和煩惱的時刻。

If you turn and walk away，你轉(zhuǎn)身走開時，your forever friend follows，真正的朋友會緊緊相隨，if you lose you way，你迷失方向時，your forever friend guides you and cheers you on.真正的朋友會引導(dǎo)你，鼓勵你。

your forever friend holds your hand and tells you that everything is going to be okay.真正的朋友會握著你的手，告訴你一切都會好起來的。

and if you find such a friend，如果你找到了這樣的朋友，you feel happy and complete，你會快樂，覺得人生完整，because you need not worry，因為你無需再憂慮。

your have a forever friend for life，你擁有了一個真正的朋友，and forever has no end.永永遠遠，永無止境。