第一篇：精彩演講稿開場白技巧（小編推薦）

演講稿又叫演說詞，它是在大會上或其他公開場合發(fā)表個人的觀點、見解和主張的文稿。演講稿的好壞直接決定了演講的成功與失敗。

一、出語驚人如果你想迅速吸引你的聽眾，那么在演講開場白，你可以描繪一個異乎尋常的場面，或透露一個觸目驚心的數(shù)據(jù)，或栩栩如生地描述一個聳人聽聞的事情，造成“此言一出，舉座皆驚”的藝術效果，這樣，聽眾不僅會驀然凝神，而且還會側耳細聽，更多地尋求你的講話內(nèi)容，探詢你演講的原因。

二、設置懸念人都有好奇的天性。在開場白中制造懸念，能激發(fā)聽眾的強烈興趣和好奇心，在適當?shù)臅r候解開懸念，使聽眾的好奇心得到滿足，也使演講前后照應，渾然一體。

三、巧用修辭精彩的演講必須有精美的語言包裝，要想語言生動活潑，就要發(fā)揮修辭的作用。在意境方面，用比喻、夸張、設問、反問、借代等修辭手法，調(diào)劑語言韻味，讓聽眾聽得有趣;在形式方面，用對偶、排比等整齊的句式來增強演講的氣勢，讓聽眾聽得振奮。

四、引用名言典故演講開場白如果恰到好處地引用富有哲理的名人語錄，不失時機地拋出寓意深刻的典故，演講就會有聲勢有威力。

五、講述故事演講稿的開頭通過故事跌宕起伏的情節(jié)，將聽眾引入一種忘我的境界，并將自己的思想觀點不動聲色地溶入到故事中，起到“隨風潛入夜，潤物細無聲”的作用，真正達到講故事的目的。

第二篇：幽默精彩演講稿開場白

幽默精彩演講稿開場白范文

篇1

陶行知“喂雞”

有一次，陶行知先生在武漢大學演講。他走上講臺，不慌不忙地從箱子里拿出一只大公雞。臺下的聽眾全愣住了。陶先生從容不迫地又掏出一把米放在桌上，然后按住公雞的頭，強迫它吃米，可是大公雞只叫不吃。他又掰開雞的嘴，把米硬往雞嘴里塞。大公雞拼命掙扎，還是不肯吃。最后陶先生輕輕地松開手，把雞放在桌子上，自己向后退了幾步，大公雞自己就吃起米來了。

這時陶先生則開始演講：“我認為，教育就跟喂雞一樣。先生強迫學生去學習，把知識硬灌給他，他是不情愿學的。即使學也食而不化，過不了多久，他還是會把知識還給先生的。但是如果讓他自由地學習，充分發(fā)揮他的主觀能動性，那效果一定會好得多!”臺下一時間歡聲雷動，為陶先生形象的演講開場白叫好。

著名素質教育家郭天祥

各位親愛的伙伴，大家好!生命的每一次重逢絕非偶然，我做夢都沒有想到今天能與大家在此相逢，這是我們幾千年來有約而今天的相識、相逢。讓我們?yōu)檫@種相逢、這種緣分給一個熱烈的掌聲。人與人之間，隨緣而聚，緣盡而散。聚時盡其在我，散時盡其在人。既是相識，既是相逢，有恩便無怨，有愛便無恨。得與失，獲得與付出，求心之所安。存有隨緣之心，完美故可喜，缺陷也是美，縱使一剎那也是永恒!上下幾千年，人口近百億，你我能相識，相聚在一起，你說珍奇不珍奇。所以想你應該，愛你應該，祝福你更應該!(自覺熱烈的長時間鼓海量資料分享

掌)。其實兩三天的課程沒有狀元老師只有狀元學生，兩三天對于人的一生是短暫的，但是，這兩三天是我的生命，也是在座的各位的生命，我會用我的生命來與各位分享，與各位見證，與各位共同達成。同時，也希望各位用生命投入這兩三天。

篇2

自嘲就是“自我開炮”，用在開場白里，目的是用詼諧的語言巧妙地自我介紹，這樣會使聽眾倍感親切，無形中縮短了與聽眾間的距離。在第四次作代會上，蕭軍應邀上臺，第一句話就是：“我叫蕭軍，是一個出土文物?！?/p>

這句話包含了多少復雜感情：有辛酸，有無奈，有自豪，有幸福。詼諧幽默演講開場白三篇詼諧幽默演講開場白三篇。而以自嘲之語表達，形式異常簡潔，內(nèi)蘊尤其豐富!胡適在一次演講時這樣開頭：“我今天不是來向諸君作報告的，我是來‘胡說’的，因為我姓胡?！痹捯魟偮?，聽眾大笑。這個開場白既巧妙地介紹了自己，又體現(xiàn)了演講者謙遜的修養(yǎng)，而且活躍了場上氣氛，溝通了演講者與聽眾的心理，一石三鳥，堪稱一絕。

1990年中央電視臺邀請臺灣影視藝術家凌峰先生參加春節(jié)聯(lián)歡晚會。許多觀眾對他還很陌生，可是他說完那妙不可言的開場白后，一下子被觀眾認同并受到了熱烈歡迎。

他說：“在下凌峰，我和文章不同，雖然我們都獲得過‘金鐘獎’和最佳男歌星稱號，但我以長得難看而出名??一般來說，女觀眾對我的印象不太好，她們認為我是人比黃花瘦，臉比煤炭黑?！边@一番話嬉而不謔，妙趣橫生，觀眾捧腹大笑。這段開場白給人們留下了非常坦誠、風趣幽默的良好印象。不久，在“金話筒之夜”文藝晚會上，只見他滿臉含笑，對觀眾說：“很高興又見到了海量資料分享

你們，很不幸又見到了我?！庇^眾報以熱烈的掌聲。至此，凌峰的名字就傳遍了祖國大地。

篇3

詼諧幽默的開場，能讓大家會心一笑，放松整個現(xiàn)場的氛圍。諧語幽默開場，可根據(jù)不同的現(xiàn)場、不同的聽眾來選擇相應的方式。

不好意思，各位，你們來錯地方了，今天的演講取消了;我想我們并不需要什么演講，我們需要的是真心的溝通，那么，我們今天真心的溝通就開始了。(一上場就跟聽眾講今天的演講取消了，所有人都會非常驚訝，然后想到底怎么回事?此時聽眾的注意力全都被吸引到了演講者的身上，然后演講者開始說：“我們今天真心的溝通就開始了?！苯酉氯ゾ烷_始演講，這種方式最大的好處就是能迅速抓住聽眾的注意力。)

“朋友們，有些人真是經(jīng)營有道，投機有方啊!有一首《訣竅銘》這一告訴我們：位不在高，頭尖則靈;官不在大，手長則行;斯是訣竅，唯吾鉆營;對上捧粗腿，對下用私人;吹牛走鴻運，拍馬不碰針，可以開后門，講交情。無正義之細胞，無原則之準繩，煙酒來開道，金錢能通神?？鬃釉唬骸伪芍小?”

我姓胡，所以我接下來說的是胡言，各位不可當真(非正式場合發(fā)言前聲明)我姓古，今天是晚上，天上有那么一點月光，與我和在一起就成了胡了，所以我說的可能是胡言亂語，各位不可計較呀!

ladies and gentlemen，有請我閃亮登臺，很喜歡我的請鼓掌，太喜歡我的不要鼓掌，謝謝合作?

海量資料分享

這段開場白給人們留下了非常坦誠、風趣幽默的良好印象。不久，在“金話筒之夜”文藝晚會上，只見他滿臉含笑，對觀眾說：“很高興又見到了你們，很不幸又見到了我?

海量資料分享

第三篇：競聘演講稿精彩開場白整理

競聘演講稿精彩開頭一：

各位領導、各位同事：

大家好!

在這里我以平常人的心態(tài)，參與支行綜合辦公室經(jīng)理崗位的競聘。首先應感謝支行領導為我們創(chuàng)造了這次公平競爭的機會!此次競聘，本人并非只是為了當官，更多的是為了響應人事制度改革的召喚，在有可能的情況下實現(xiàn)自己的人生價值。

競聘演講稿精彩開頭二：

今天，我走上演講臺的惟一目的就是競選“班級元首”--班長。我堅信，憑著我新銳不俗的“官念”，憑著我新銳不俗的“官念”，憑著我的勇氣和才干，憑著我與大家同舟共濟的深厚友情，這次競選演講給我?guī)淼谋囟ㄊ窍麓蔚木吐氀菡f。

競聘演講稿精彩開頭三：

尊敬的各位領導，各位評委：

大家好!

(演講提示：演講中身體要略向前傾，表現(xiàn)出與觀眾交流與親近的姿態(tài))

今天，我能夠站在這里，參加競聘**銀行副職崗位，深感榮幸和激動。首先感謝領導給我一個展示自己的機會，感謝同事們對我的支持和幫助!作為一名對銀行事業(yè)充滿熱愛、無比忠誠的人，我應該站出來，接受組織的挑選。

競聘演講稿精彩開頭四：

尊敬的*，各位同事：

很高興，也很榮幸，能向大家作一個工作匯報。

首先，我從內(nèi)心感謝組織的培養(yǎng)和領導的信任，多年來組織和領導對我的工作給予了相當?shù)目隙?。其次，如果我能和大家一起共事，我感到非常榮幸，也非常愿意。俗話說，十年修得同船渡，能和大家一起共事，這修行得要幾十年啊，說明我們都是有緣人，緣分不淺啊，所以，我一定珍惜和大家一起共事的工作機會。

競聘演講稿精彩開頭五：

各位領導、同志們：大家好!

此時此刻，我能以一個競爭者的身份走上演講臺，向各位展示自己，心里既激動又緊張。激動是因為我幸運地趕上了公平競爭的大好時機，緊張是因為我害怕有負領導和同志們的厚望。但無論如何，我要對局黨委這一英明而富有魄力的決策表示衷心地感謝!并借此向所有關心支持我的領導和同志們表示深深的謝意!至于說到對競聘的認識，我想局屬xx單位競聘的成功實踐已經(jīng)作出了回答，全局上下呈現(xiàn)出的百川歸海，百舸爭流的可喜局面就是最有力的證明。對此，我一舉雙手贊成，二要積極參與。我要競聘的職位是業(yè)務科室副職。

第四篇：演講稿精彩的開場白

文章開頭最難寫，同樣道理，作演講開場白最不易把握，要想三言兩語抓住聽眾的心，并非易事。如果在演講的開始聽眾對你的話就不感興趣，注意力一旦被分散了，那后面再精彩的言論也將黯然失色。因此只有匠心獨運的開場白，以其新穎、奇趣、敏慧之美，才能給聽眾留下深刻印象，才能立即控制場上氣氛，在瞬間里集中聽眾注意力，從而為接下來的演講內(nèi)容順利地搭梯架橋。

奇論妙語石破天驚聽眾對平庸普通的論調(diào)都不屑一顧，置若罔聞;倘若發(fā)人未見，用別人意想不到的見解引出話題，造成此言一出，舉座皆驚的藝術效果，會立即震撼聽眾，使他們急不可耐地聽下去，這樣就能達到吸引聽眾的目的。

我記起了畢業(yè)歡送會上班主任給我們的致詞。他一開口就讓我們疑竇叢生我原來想祝福大家一帆風順，但仔細一想，這樣說不恰當。這句話把我們弄得丈二和尚摸不著頭腦，大家屏聲靜氣地聽下去說人生一帆風順就如同祝某人萬壽無疆一樣，是一個美麗而又空洞的謊言。人生漫漫，必然會遇到許多艱難困苦，比如&&最后得出結論：一帆風不順的人生才是真實的人生，在逆風險浪中拼搏的人生才是最輝煌的人生。祝大家奮力拼搏，在坎坷的征程中，用堅實有力的步伐走向美好的未來!十多年過去了，班主任的話語猶在耳邊，給我留下了永難磨滅的印象。一帆風順是常見的吉祥祝語，而老師偏偏反彈琵琶，從另一角度悟出了人生哲理。第一句話無異于平地驚雷，又宛若異峰突起，怎能不震撼人心? 需要注意的是，運用這種方式應掌握分寸，弄不好會變?yōu)閲W眾取寵，故作聳人之語。應結合聽眾心理、理解層次出奇制勝。再有，不能為了追求怪異而大發(fā)謬論、怪論，也不能生硬牽扯，胡亂升華。否則，極易引起聽眾的反感和厭倦。須知，無論多么新鮮的認識始終是建立在正確的主旨之上的。

自嘲開路幽默搭橋自嘲就是自我開炮，用在開場白里，目的是用詼諧的語言巧妙地自我介紹，這樣會使聽眾倍感親切，無形中縮短了與聽眾間的距離。在第四次作代會上，蕭軍應邀上臺，第一句話就是：我叫蕭軍，是一個出土文物。這句話包含了多少復雜感情：有辛酸，有無奈，有自豪，有幸福。而以自嘲之語表達，形式異常簡潔，內(nèi)蘊尤其豐富!胡適在一次演講時這樣開頭：我今天不是來向諸君作報告的，我是來‘胡說’的，因為我姓胡。話音剛落，聽眾大笑。這個開場白既巧妙地介紹了自己，又體現(xiàn)了演講者謙遜的修養(yǎng)，而且活躍了場上氣氛，溝通了演講者與聽眾的心理，一石三鳥，堪稱一絕。

第五篇：英文精彩演講稿開場白集錦

Opening Statement

mr.chairman, senator thurmond, members of the committee, my name is anita f.hill, and i am a professor of law at the university of oklahoma.i was born on a farm in okmulgee county, oklahoma, in 1956.i am the youngest of 13 children.i had my early education in okmulgee county.my father, albert hill, is a farmer in that area.my mother's name is irma hill.she is also a farmer and a housewife.my childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents.i was reared in a religious atmosphere in the baptist faith, and i have been a member of the antioch baptist church in tulsa, oklahoma, since 1983.it is a very warm part of my life at the present time.for my undergraduate work, i went to oklahoma state university and graduated from there in 1977.i am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.i graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the yale law school, where i received my jd degree in 1980.upon graduation from law school, i became a practicing lawyer with the washington, dc, firm of ward, hardraker, and ross.in 1981, i was introduced to now judge thomas by a mutual friend.judge thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if i would be interested in working with him.he was, in fact, appointed as assistant secretary of education for civil rights.after he had taken that post, he asked if i would become his assistant, and i accepted that position.in my early period there, i had two major projects.the first was an article i wrote for judge thomas' signature on the education of minority students.the second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because judge thomas transferred to the eeoc where he became the chairman of that office.during this period at the department of education, my working relationship with judge thomas was positive.i had a good deal of responsibility and independence.i thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment.after approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.what happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things--experiences of my life.it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleepless number--a great number of sleepless nights that i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.i declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that i thought it would jeopardize what at the time i considered to be a very good working relationship.i had a normal social life with other men outside of the office.i believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised.i was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.i thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions.however, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions.he pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him.these incidents took place in his office or mine.they were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.my working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to discuss sex.on these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria.after a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual matters.his conversations were very vivid.he spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes.he talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various sex acts.on several occasions, thomas told me graphically of his own sexual prowess.because i was extremely uncomfortable talking about sex with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, i told him that i did not want to talk about these subjects.i would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonsexual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs.my efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements.my reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations.this was difficult because at the time i was his only assistant at the office of education--or office for civil rights.during the latter part of my time at the department of education, the social pressures and any conversation of his offensive behavior ended.i began both to believe and hope that our working relationship could be a proper, cordial, and professional one.when judge thomas was made chair of the eeoc, i needed to face the question of whether to go with him.i was asked to do so, and i did.the work itself was interesting, and at that time it appeared that the sexual overtures which had so troubled me had ended.i also faced the realistic fact that i had no alternative job.while i might have gone back to private practice, perhaps in my old firm or at another, i was dedicated to civil rights work, and my first choice was to be in that field.moreover, the department of education itself was a dubious venture.president reagan was seeking to abolish the entire department.for my first months at the eeoc, where i continued to be an assistant to judge thomas, there were no sexual conversations or overtures.however, during the fall and winter of 1982, these began again.the comments were random and ranged from pressing me about why i didn't go out with him to remarks about my personal appearance.i remember his saying that some day i would have to tell him the real reason that i wouldn't go out with him.he began to show displeasure in his tone and voice and his demeanor and his continued pressure for an explanation.he commented on what i was wearing in terms of whether it made me more or less sexually attractive.the incidents occurred in his inner office at the eeoc.one of the oddest episodes i remember was an occasion in which thomas was drinking a coke in his office.he got up from the table at which we were working, went over to his desk to get the coke, looked at the can and asked, “who has pubic hair on my coke?” on other occasions, he referred to the size of his own penis as being larger than normal, and he also spoke on some occasions of the pleasures he had given to women with oral sex.at this point, late 1982, i began to feel severe stress on the job.i began to be concerned that clarence thomas might take out his anger with me by degrading me or not giving me important assignments.i also thought that he might find an excuse for dismissing me.in january of 1983, i began looking for another job.i was handicapped because i feared that, if he found out, he might make it difficult for me to find other employment and i might be dismissed from the job i had.another factor that made my search more difficult was that there was a period--this was during a period of a hiring freeze in the government.in february of 1983, i was hospitalized for five days on an emergency basis for acute stomach pain which i attributed to stress on the job.once out of the hospital, i became more committed to find other employment and sought further to minimize my contact with thomas.this became easier when allison duncan(sp)became office director, because most of my work was then funneled through her and i had contact with clarence thomas mostly in staff meetings.in the spring of 1983, an opportunity to teach at oral roberts university opened up.i participated in a seminar--taught an afternoon session and seminar at oral roberts university.the dean of the university saw me teaching and inquired as to whether i would be interested in furthering--pursuing a career in teaching, beginning at oral roberts university.i agreed to take the job in large part because of my desire to escape the pressures i felt at the eeoc due to judge thomas.when i informed him that i was leaving in july, i recall that his response was that now i would no longer have an excuse for not going out with him.i told him that i still preferred not to do so.at some time after that meeting, he asked if he could take me to dinner at the end of the term.when i declined, he assured me that the dinner was a professional courtesy only and not a social invitation.i reluctantly agreed to accept that invitation, but only if it was at the every end of a working day.on, as i recall, the last day of my employment at the eeoc in the summer of 1983, i did have dinner with clarence thomas.we went directly from work to a restaurant near the office.we talked about the work i had done, both at education and at the eeoc.he told me that he was pleased with all of it except for an article and speech that i had done for him while we were at the office for civil rights.finally, he made a comment that i will vividly remember.he said that if i ever told anyone of his behavior that it would ruin his career.this was not an apology, nor was it an explanation.that was his last remark about the possibility of our going out or reference to his behavior.in july of 1983, i left washington, dc area and have had minimal contact

with judge clarence thomas since.i am of course aware from the press that some questions have been raised about conversations i had with judge clarence thomas after i left the eeoc.from 1983 until today, i have seen judge thomas only twice.on one occasion, i needed to get a reference from him, and on another he made a public appearance in tulsa.on one occasion he called me at home and we had an inconsequential conversation.on one occasion he called me without reaching me, and i returned the call without reaching him, and nothing came of it.i have on at least three occasions, been asked to act as a conduit to him for others.i knew his secretary, diane holt.we had worked together at both eeoc and education.there were occasions on which i spoke to her, and on some of these occasions undoubtedly i passed on some casual comment to then chairman thomas.there were a series of calls in the first three months of 1985, occasioned by a group in tulsa, which wished to have a civil rights conference.they wanted judge thomas to be the speaker and enlisted my assistance for this purpose.i did call in january and february to no effect, and finally suggested to the person directly involved, susan cahal(ph)that she put the matter into her own hands and call directly.she did so in march of 1985.in connection with that march invitation, ms.cahal(ph)wanted conference materials for the seminar and some research was needed.i was asked to try to get the information and did attempted to do so.there was another call about another possible conference in july of 1985.in august of 1987, i was in washington, dc and i did call diane holt.in the course of this conversation, she asked me how long i was going to be in town and i told her.it is recorded in the message as august 15.it was, in fact, august 20th.she told me about judge thomas's marriage and i did say congratulate him.it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration that i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone except my closest friends.as i've said before these last few days have been very trying and very hard for me and it hasn't just been the last few days this week.it has actually been over a month now that i have been under the strain of this issue.telling the world is the most difficult experience of my life, but it is very close to having to live through the experience that occasion this meeting.i may have used poor judgment early on in my relationship with this issue.i was aware, however, that telling at any point in my career could adversely affect my future career.and i did not want early on to burn all the bridges to the eeoc.as i said, i may have used poor judgment.perhaps i should have taken angry or even militant steps, both when i was in the agency, or after i left it.but i must confess to the world that the course that i took seemed the better as well as the easier approach.i declined any comment to newspapers, but later when senate staff asked me about these matters i felt i had a duty to report.i have no personal vendetta against clarence thomas.i seek only to provide the committee with information which it may regard as relevant.it would have been more comfortable to remain silent.i took no initiative to inform anyone.but when i was asked by a representative of this committee to report my experience, i felt that i had to tell the truth.i could not keep silent.