第一篇：商標評審規(guī)則(中英文對照)

商標評審規(guī)則

(1995年11月2日原國家工商行政管理局第37號令公布；2002年9月17日國家工商行政管理總局令第3號第一次修訂；2005年9月26日國家工商行政管理總局令第20號第二次修訂)

第一章 總則

第一條 根據《中華人民共和國商標法》(以下簡稱商標法)和《中華人民共和國商標法實施條例》(以下簡稱實施條例)的規(guī)定，制定本規(guī)則。

第二條 依據商標法及其實施條例的規(guī)定，國家工商行政管理總局商標評審委員會(以下簡稱商標評審委員會)負責處理下列商標評審案件：

(一)不服國家工商行政管理總局商標局(以下簡稱商標局)駁回商標注冊申請的決定，依據商標法第三十二條規(guī)定申請復審的案件；

(二)不服商標局的異議裁定，依據商標法第三十三條規(guī)定申請復審的案件；

(三)對已經注冊的商標，依據商標法第四十一條規(guī)定請求裁定撤銷的案件；

(四)不服商標局依照商標法第四十一條第一款、第四十四條、第四十五條的規(guī)定作出撤銷或者維持注冊商標的決定，依據商標法第四十九條規(guī)定申請復審的案件。

第三條 當事人參加商標爭議案件的評審活動，應當以書面形式辦理。

第四條 商標評審委員會審理商標爭議案件實行書面審理，但依據實施條例第三十三條規(guī)定決定公開評審的情形除外。

第五條 商標評審委員會依據商標法、實施條例和本規(guī)則作出的決定和裁定，應當以書面形式通知有關當事人，并說明理由。

第六條 除本規(guī)則另有規(guī)定外，商標評審委員會審理商標爭議案件實行合議制度，由商標評審人員組成合議組進行審理。

合議組審理案件，實行少數服從多數的原則。

第七條 當事人或者利害關系人依據實施條例第九條的規(guī)定申請商標評審人員回避的，應當以書面形式辦理，并說明理由。

第八條 在商標評審期間，當事人有權依法處分自己的商標權和與商標評審有關的權利。在顧及社會公共利益、第三方權利的前提下，當事人之間可以自行以書面形式達成和解，商標評審委員會也可以進行調解。

第九條 共有商標的當事人參加商標評審活動，應當指定一人為代表人；沒有指定代表人的，以其在商標注冊申請書或者商標注冊簿中載明的順序第一人為代表人。代表人參與評審的行為對其所代表的當事人發(fā)生效力，但代表人變更、放棄評審請求或者承認對方當事人的評審請求，必須有被代表的當事人書面授權。

第十條 外國人或者外國企業(yè)辦理商標評審事宜，在中國有經常居所或者營業(yè)所的，可以委托國家認可的具有商標代理資格的組織代理，也可以直接辦理；在中國沒有經常居所或者營業(yè)所的，應當委托國家認可的具有商標代理資格的組織代理。

代理權限發(fā)生變更、代理關系解除或者變更代理人的，當事人或者代理人應當及時書面告知商標評審委員會。

第十一條 當事人及其代理人可以申請查閱本案有關材料。

第二章 申請與受理

第十二條 申請商標評審，應當符合下列條件：

(一)申請人須有合法的主體資格；

(二)在法定期限內提出；

(三)屬于商標評審委員會的評審范圍；

(四)依法提交符合規(guī)定的申請書及有關證據材料；

(五)有明確的評審請求、事實根據和理由；

(六)依法繳納評審費用。

第十三條 申請商標評審，應當向商標評審委員會提交申請書；有被申請人的，應當按照被申請人的數量提交相應份數的副本；申請人的商標發(fā)生轉讓、移轉，已向商標局提出申請但是尚未核準公告的，申請人應當提供相應的證明文件；基于商標局的決定書或者裁定書申請復審的，還應當同時附送商標局的決定書或者裁定書。

第十四條 申請書應當載明下列事項：

(一)申請人的名稱、住所地、通訊地址、聯系人和聯系電話。評審申請有被申請人的，應當載明被申請人的名稱和住所地。委托商標代理組織辦理商標評審事宜的，還應當載明商標代理組織的名稱、通訊地址、聯系人和聯系電話；

(二)爭議商標及其申請?zhí)柣蛘叱醪綄彾ㄌ?、注冊號和刊登該商標的《商標公告》的期號?/p>

(三)明確的評審請求和所根據的事實、理由及法律依據。

第十五條 商標評審申請不符合本規(guī)則第十二條第(一)、(二)、(三)項規(guī)定條件之一的，商標評審委員會不予受理，書面通知申請人，并說明理由。

第十六條 商標評審申請不符合本規(guī)則第十二條第(四)、(五)、(六)項規(guī)定條件之一的，或者未按照實施條例和本規(guī)則規(guī)定提交有關證明文件的，商標評審委員會應當向申請人發(fā)出補正通知，限其自收到補正通知之日起30日內補正。

經補正仍不符合規(guī)定的，商標評審委員會不予受理，書面通知申請人，并說明理由。期滿未補正的，依據實施條例第三十條規(guī)定，視為申請人撤回評審 申請，商標評審委員會應當書面通知申請人。

第十七條 商標評審申請經審查符合受理條件的，商標評審委員會應當在30日內向申請人發(fā)出《受理通知書》。

第十八條 商標評審委員會已經受理的商標評審申請，有下列情形之一的，屬于不符合受理條件，應當依據實施條例第三十條規(guī)定予以駁回：

(一)違反商標法第四十二條規(guī)定，對核準注冊前已經提出異議并經裁定的商標，又以相同的事實和理由申請裁定的；

(二)違反實施條例第三十五條規(guī)定，申請人撤回商標評審申請后，又以相同的事實和理由再次提出評審申請的；

(三)違反實施條例第三十五條規(guī)定，對商標評審委員會已經作出的裁定或者決定，以相同的事實和理由再次提出評審申請的；

(四)其他不符合受理條件的情形。

商標評審委員會駁回商標評審申請，應當書面通知申請人，并說明理由。

第十九條 評審申請有被申請人的，商標評審委員會受理后，應當及時將申請書副本及有關證據材料送達被申請人，限其自收到申請書副本之日起30日內向商標評審委員會提交答辯書，并按照申請人的數量提交相應份數的副本；期滿未提交或逾期提交的，視為放棄答辯。

第二十條 當事人需要在提出評審申請或者答辯后補充有關證據材料的，應當在申請書或者答辯書中聲明，并自提交申請書或者答辯書之日起3個月內一次性提交與申請書或答辯書相同份數的證據材料；未在申請書或答辯書中聲明或者期滿未提交的，視為放棄補充有關證據材料。但是，期滿后基于新的事實形成的證據或者確有其他正當理由的除外。

對當事人在法定期限內提供的證據材料，有對方當事人的，商標評審委員會應當將該證據材料發(fā)送給對方當事人，限其在指定期限內進行質證。

第二十一條 申請人提交申請書或者被申請人提交答辯書時，應當同時提交能夠證明其身份的有效證件。申請人或者被申請人的名稱應當與所提交的證件相一致。

當事人名稱或者住所等事項發(fā)生變更的，應當提供相應的證明文件。

第二十二條 當事人應當對其提交的證據材料逐一分類編號和制作目錄清單，對證據材料的來源、證明的具體事實作簡要說明，并簽名蓋章。

商標評審委員會收到當事人提交的證據材料后，應當按目錄清單核對證據材料，并由經辦人員在回執(zhí)上簽收，注明提交日期。

第二十三條 商標評審申請書及有關證據材料應當按照規(guī)定的格式和要求填寫、提供。未按照規(guī)定格式和要求填寫、提供的，商標評審委員會向申請人發(fā)出補正通知，限其自收到補正通知之日起30日內補正。經補正仍不符合規(guī)定或者期滿未補正的，適用本規(guī)則第十六條第二款的規(guī)定處理。

商標評審答辯書及有關證據材料應當按照規(guī)定的格式和要求填寫、提供。未按照規(guī)定格式和要求填寫、提供的，商標評審委員會向被申請人發(fā)出補正通知，限其自收到補正通知之日起30日內補正。經補正仍不符合規(guī)定或者期滿未補正的，不影響商標評審委員會的評審。

第三章 審理

第二十四條 商標評審委員會審理商標評審案件應當組成合議組進行審理。合議組由商標評審人員3人以上的單數組成。但有下列情形之一的案件，可以由商標評審人員一人獨任評審：

(一)商標局作出駁回決定、異議裁定所引證的商標在評審時已經喪失專用權或者在先權利的；

(二)被請求裁定撤銷的商標已經喪失專用權的；

(三)商標局作出駁回決定所引證的商標歸申請人所有，因申請人未及時辦理變更手續(xù)被商標局駁回，評審時申請人已向商標局申請辦完變更手續(xù)的；

(四)商標局作出駁回決定所引證的他人在先申請或者注冊商標，評審時已核準轉讓給申請人的；

(五)其他可以獨任評審的案件。

第二十五條 當事人或者利害關系人依據實施條例第九條和本規(guī)則第七條的規(guī)定對商標評審人員提出回避申請的，被申請回避的商標評審人員在商標評審委員會作出是否回避的決定前，應當暫停參與本案的審理工作。

商標評審委員會在作出決定、裁定后收到當事人或者利害關系人提出的回避申請的，不影響評審決定、裁定的有效性。但評審人員確實存在需要回避的情形的，商標評審委員會應當依法作出處理。

第二十六條 商標評審委員會對當事人提出的回避申請，應當在收到申請后7日內，以書面形式作出決定，并書面通知申請人。申請人對商標評審委員會作出的不回避決定不服的，可以在收到決定后3日內申請復議一次。復議期間，被申請回避的商標評審人員，不停止參與本案的審理工作。商標評審委員會對復議申請應當在3日內作出復議決定，并書面通知復議申請人。

第二十七條 商標評審委員會審理不服商標局駁回商標注冊申請決定的復審案件，除應當適用商標法第十條、第十一條、第十二條和第十六條第一款規(guī)定外，應當針對商標局的駁回決定和申請人申請復審的事實、理由、請求以及評審時的事實狀態(tài)進行評審。商標評審委員會根據本條前述規(guī)定作出復審決定前應當聽取申請人的意見。

第二十八條 商標評審委員會審理不服商標局異議裁定的復審案件，應當針對當事人復審申請和答辯的事實、理由及請求進行評審。

第二十九條 商標評審委員會審理依據商標法第四十一條請求裁定撤銷注冊商標的案件，應當針對當事人申請和答辯的事實、理由及請求進行評審。

第三十條 商標評審委員會審理不服商標局依照商標法第四十一條第一款規(guī)定作出撤銷注冊商標決定的復審案件，應當針對商標局的決定和申請人申請復審的事實、理由及請求進行評審。

商標評審委員會審理不服商標局依照商標法第四十四條、第四十五條規(guī)定作出撤銷或者維持注冊商標決定的復審案件，應當針對商標局作出撤銷或者維持注冊商標決定時所依據的事實、理由和法律適用進行評審。但是，依據商標法第四十四條第(四)項申請復審的案件當事人需要補充證據且有正當理由的除外。

第三十一條 在商標評審程序中，當事人的商標權發(fā)生轉讓、移轉的，受讓人或者承繼人應當及時以書面形式聲明承受轉讓人的地位，參加后續(xù)評審程序并承擔相應的評審后果。

第三十二條 有下列情形之一的，終止評審：

(一)申請人死亡或者終止后沒有繼承人或者繼承人放棄評審權利的；

(二)申請人撤回評審申請的；

(三)當事人自行和解或者經商標評審委員會調解后達成協議的；

(四)其他應當終止評審的情形。

終止評審的，商標評審委員會予以結案，書面通知有關當事人，并說明理由。

第三十三條 合議組審理案件應當制作合議筆錄，并由合議組成員簽名。合議組成員有不同意見的，應當如實記入合議筆錄。

經審理終結的案件，商標評審委員會依法作出決定、裁定。

第三十四條 商標評審委員會作出的決定書、裁定書應當載明下列內容：

(一)評審請求、爭議的事實和理由；

(二)決定或者裁定認定的事實、理由和適用的法律依據；

(三)決定或者裁定結論；

(四)可供當事人選用的后續(xù)程序和時限；

(五)決定、裁定作出的日期。

決定書、裁定書由合議組成員署名，加蓋商標評審委員會印章。

第三十五條 對商標評審委員會作出的決定、裁定，當事人不服向人民法院起訴的，應當在向人民法院遞交起訴狀的同時或者至遲15日內將該起訴狀副本抄送或者另行書面告知商標評審委員會。

商標評審委員會自所作出的決定、裁定發(fā)出之日起60日內未收到來自人民法院或者案件當事人任何有關該決定、裁定之起訴信息的，視為有關當事人未向法院起訴，該決定、裁定移送商標局執(zhí)行。

第三十六條 商標評審委員會根據當事人的請求或者實際需要，可以決定對評審申請進行公開評審。

第三十七條 當事人請求進行公開評審的，應當提出需要進行公開評審的具體理由。

第三十八條 申請人請求進行公開評審的，應當自收到被申請人的答辯書副本之日起15日內以書面形式向商標評審委員會提出；被申請人請求進行公開評審的，應當在向商標評審委員會提交答辯書或者補充有關證據材料時一并提出。

第三十九條 公開評審的具體程序由商標評審委員會另行規(guī)定。

第四章 證據規(guī)則

第四十條 當事人對自己提出的評審請求所依據的事實或者反駁對方評審請求所依據的事實有責任提供證據加以證明。沒有證據或者證據不足以證明當事人的事實主張的，由負有舉證責任的當事人承擔不利后果。

一方當事人對另一方當事人陳述的案件事實明確表示承認的，另一方當事人無需舉證。

對一方當事人陳述的事實，另一方當事人既未表示承認也未否認的，視為對該項事實的承認。

當事人委托代理人參加評審的，代理人的承認視為當事人的承認。但未經特別授權的代理人對事實的承認直接導致承認對方評審請求的除外；當事人在 場但對其代理人的承認不作否認表示的，視為當事人的承認。

第四十一條 下列事實，當事人無需舉證證明：

(一)眾所周知的事實；

(二)按照法律規(guī)定推定的事實；

(三)已經依法證明的事實；

(四)根據日常生活經驗法則推定的事實；

(五)其他依法無需舉證的事實。

但當事人有相反證據足以推翻的除外。

第四十二條 當事人向商標評審委員會提供書證的，應當提供原件，包括原本、正本和副本。提供原件有困難的，可以提供相應的復印件、照片、節(jié)錄本；提供由有關部門保管的書證原件的復制件、影印件或者抄錄件的，應當注明出處，經該部門核對無異后加蓋其印章。

當事人向商標評審委員會提供物證的，應當提供原物。提供原物有困難的，可以提供相應的復制件或者證明該物證的照片、錄像等其他證據；原物為數量較多的種類物的，提供其中的一部分。

一方當事人對另一方當事人所提書證、物證的復制件或者照片等存在懷疑并有相應證據支持的，或者商標評審委員會認為有必要的，被質疑的當事人應當提供或者出示有關證據的原件或經公證的復印件。

第四十三條 當事人向商標評審委員會提供的證據系在中華人民共和國領域外形成，或者在香港、澳門、臺灣地區(qū)形成，對方當事人對該證據的真實性存在懷疑并有相應證據支持的，或者商標評審委員會認為必要的，應當依照有關規(guī)定辦理相應的公證認證手續(xù)。

第四十四條 當事人向商標評審委員會提供外文書證或者外文說明資料，應當附有中文譯文。提交外文證據的當事人未提交中文譯文的，該外文證據視為未提交。

對方當事人對譯文具體內容有異議的，應當對有異議的部分提交中文譯 文。必要時，可以委托雙方當事人認可的單位對全文、或者所使用部分或者有異議的部分進行翻譯。

雙方當事人對委托翻譯達不成協議的，商標評審委員會可以指定專業(yè)翻譯單位對全文、或者所使用部分或者有異議部分進行翻譯。委托翻譯所需費用由雙方當事人各承擔50％；拒絕支付翻譯費用的，視為其承認對方提交的譯文。

第四十五條 對單一證據有無證明力和證明力大小可以從下列方面進行審核認定：

(一)證據是否原件、原物，復印件、復制品與原件、原物是否相符；

(二)證據與本案事實是否相關；

(三)證據的形式、來源是否符合法律規(guī)定；

(四)證據的內容是否真實；

(五)證人或者提供證據的人，與當事人有無利害關系。

第四十六條 評審人員對案件的全部證據，應當從各證據與案件事實的關聯程度、各證據之間的聯系等方面進行綜合審查判斷。

第四十七條 下列證據不能單獨作為認定案件事實的依據：

(一)未成年人所作的與其年齡和智力狀況不相適應的證言；

(二)與一方當事人有親屬關系、隸屬關系或者其他密切關系的證人所作的對該當事人有利的證言，或者與一方當事人有不利關系的證人所作的對該當事人不利的證言；

(三)應當參加公開評審作證而無正當理由不參加公開評審作證的證人證言；

(四)難以識別是否經過修改的視聽資料；

(五)無法與原件、原物核對的復制件或者復制品；

(六)經一方當事人或者他人改動，對方當事人不予認可的證據材料；

(七)其他不能單獨作為認定案件事實依據的證據材料。

第四十八條 一方當事人提出的下列證據，對方當事人提出異議但沒有足以反駁的相反證據的，商標評審委員會應當確認其證明力：

(一)書證原件或者與書證原件核對無誤的復印件、照片、副本、節(jié)錄本；

(二)物證原物或者與物證原物核對無誤的復制件、照片、錄像資料等；

(三)有其他證據佐證并以合法手段取得的、無疑點的視聽資料或者與視聽資料核對無誤的復制件。

第四十九條 一方當事人委托鑒定部門作出的鑒定結論，另一當事人沒有足以反駁的相反證據和理由的，可以認定其證明力。

第五十條 一方當事人提出的證據，另一方當事人認可或者提出的相反證據不足以反駁的，商標評審委員會可以確認其證明力。

一方當事人提出的證據，另一方當事人有異議并提出反駁證據，對方當事人對反駁證據認可的，可以確認反駁證據的證明力。

第五十一條 雙方當事人對同一事實分別舉出相反的證據，但都沒有足夠的依據否定對方證據的，商標評審委員會應當結合案件情況，判斷一方提供證據的證明力是否明顯大于另一方提供證據的證明力，并對證明力較大的證據予以確認。

因證據的證明力無法判斷導致爭議事實難以認定的，商標評審委員會應當依據舉證責任分配原則作出判斷。

第五十二條 評審過程中，當事人在申請書、答辯書、陳述及其委托代理人的代理詞中承認的對己方不利的事實和認可的證據，商標評審委員會應當予以確認，但當事人反悔并有相反證據足以推翻的除外。

第五十三條 當事人對自己的主張，只有本人陳述而不能提出其他相關證據的，其主張不予支持。但對方當事人認可的除外。

第五十四條 商標評審委員會就數個證據對同一事實的證明力，可以依照下列原則認定：

(一)國家機關以及其他職能部門依職權制作的公文文書優(yōu)于其他書證；

(二)鑒定結論、檔案材料以及經過公證或者登記的書證優(yōu)于其他書證、視聽資料和證人證言；

(三)原件、原物優(yōu)于復制件、復制品；

(四)法定鑒定部門的鑒定結論優(yōu)于其他鑒定部門的鑒定結論；

(五)原始證據優(yōu)于傳來證據；

(六)其他證人證言優(yōu)于與當事人有親屬關系或者其他密切關系的證人提供的對該當事人有利的證言；

(七)參加公開評審作證的證人證言優(yōu)于未參加公開評審作證的證人證言；

(八)數個種類不同、內容一致的證據優(yōu)于一個孤立的證據。

第五章 期間、送達

第五十五條 期間包括法定期間和商標評審委員會指定的期間。

期間以日、月、年計算。期間開始的當日，不計算在期間內。

期間屆滿的最后一日是節(jié)假日的，以節(jié)假日后的第一個工作日為期間屆滿的日期。

第五十六條 當事人向商標評審委員會提交的文件或者材料的日期，直接遞交的，以遞交日為準；郵寄的，以寄出的郵戳日為準；郵戳日不清晰或者沒有郵戳的，以商標評審委員會實際收到日為準，但是當事人能夠提出實際郵戳日證據的除外。

第五十七條 商標評審委員會的各種文件，可以通過郵寄、直接遞交或者其他方式送達當事人。當事人委托商標代理組織的，文件送達商標代理組織視為送達當事人。

商標評審委員會向當事人送達各種文件的日期，郵寄的，以當事人收到的郵戳日為準；郵戳日不清晰或者沒有郵戳的，或者沒有被郵局退回的，自文件發(fā)出之日起滿15日，視為送達當事人；直接遞交的，以遞交日為準。文件無法 郵寄或者無法直接遞交的，可以通過公告方式送達當事人，自公告發(fā)布之日起滿30日，該文件視為已經送達。

第五十八條 當事人是在中華人民共和國沒有經常居所或者營業(yè)所的外國人或者外國企業(yè)的，由商標注冊檔案中載明的商標代理組織承擔商標評審程序中該商標的有關法律文件的簽收義務；商標評審委員會將有關法律文件送達該商標代理組織，視為送達當事人。

商標代理組織在前款所述有關法律文件送達之前已經與有關外國當事人解除商標代理關系的，應當以書面形式向商標評審委員會說明有關情況，并自收到文件之日起10日內將有關法律文件交回商標評審委員會，由商標評審委員會另行送達。

馬德里國際注冊商標涉及國際局轉發(fā)相關書件的，應當提交相應的送達證據。未提交的，應書面說明原因，自國際局發(fā)文之日起滿15日視為送達。

上述方式無法送達的，公告送達。

第六章 附則

第五十九條 對商標法修改決定于2001年12月1日施行前發(fā)生，屬于修改后商標法第四條、第五條、第八條、第九條第一款、第十條第一款第(一)、(三)、(四)項、第十條第二款、第十一條、第十二條、第十三條、第十五條、第十六條、第二十四條、第二十五條、第三十一條所列舉的情形，商標評審委員會在商標法修改決定施行后進行評審的，依據修改后商標法的相應規(guī)定進行評審；屬于其他情形的，商標評審委員會適用修改前商標法的相應規(guī)定進行評審。

當事人就商標法修改決定施行時注冊已滿一年的商標產生爭議，向商標評審委員會申請評審的，適用修改前商標法第二十七條第二款規(guī)定的提出申請的期限處理；當事人就商標法修改決定施行時注冊不滿一年的商標產生爭議，向商標評審委員會申請評審的，適用修改后商標法第四十一條第三款規(guī)定的提出申請的期限處理。

有關單位或者個人在商標法修改決定施行前依照修改前商標法第二十七條及其實施細則第二十五條的規(guī)定提出評審申請，屬于修改后商標法第十三條、第十五條、第十六條和第三十一條規(guī)定情形的，不適用修改后商標法第四十一條第二款規(guī)定的提出評審申請的期限規(guī)定。

第六十條 辦理商標評審事宜的文書格式，由國家工商行政管理總局制定并公布。

第六十一條

第六十二條

本規(guī)則由國家工商行政管理總局負責解釋。本規(guī)則自2005年10月26日起施行。14 Rules for Trademark Review and Adjudication

(Promulgated on 2 November 1995 in the Order No.37 of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce;revised for the first time on 17 September 2002 in the Order No.3 of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce;revised for the second time on 26 September 2005 in the Order No.20 of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce)

Chapter I General Provisions

Rule 1 These Rules are hereby formulated in accordance with the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China(hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Law)and the Regulations for the Implementation of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China(hereinafter referred to as the Implementing Regulations).Rule 2 Under the Trademark Law and the Implementing Regulations thereof, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce(hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board)shall be responsible for handling the following cases of trademark dispute:(1)cases of application for reexamination filed according to the provision of Article 32 of the Trademark Law out of dissatisfaction with decisions made by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce(hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Office)on rejection of applications for trademark registration;(2)cases of application for reexamination filed according to the provision of Article 33 of the Trademark Law out of dissatisfaction with opposition adjudication made by the Trademark Office;(3)cases of request for adjudication on cancellation of registered trademarks filed according to the provision of Article 41 of the Trademark Law;and(4)cases of application for reexamination filed according to the provision of Article 49 of the Trademark Law out of dissatisfaction with a decision to cancel or uphold a registered trademark made by the Trademark Office according to the provisions of Articles 41, paragraph one, 44 and 45 of the Trademark Law.Rule 3 The review and adjudication activities in which an interested party participates in cases of trademark dispute shall proceed in writing.Rule 4 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall hear cases of trademark dispute in writing, except the circumstances where it decides to publicly review and adjudicate a case according to the provision of Article 33 of Implementing Regulations.Rule 5 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify, in writing, the interested parties of, and explain the reason for, the decisions and adjudication made according to the Trademark Law, the Implementing Regulations and these Rules.Rule 6 Unless otherwise provided for in these Rules, the collegial system shall be adopted for the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board to hear cases of trademark dispute, and the examiners for the trademark review and adjudication shall make a collegial panel to conduct the hearing of a case.When the collegial panel hears a case, the principle is adopted that the minority are subordinate to the majority.Rule 7 An interested party who applies for withdrawal of an examiner for trademark review and adjudication according to the provision of Article 9 of the Implementing Regulations shall file the application in writing, and explain the reason therefor.Rule 8 During the review and adjudication, an interested party shall have the right to dispose of, according to law, his trademark right and the right relating to trademark review and adjudication.Provided that public interests and a third party’s rights are taken into consideration, interested parties may reach an amicable settlement agreement in writing by themselves.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may conduct mediation.Rule 9 Where interested parties who are co-owners of a trademark participate in the review and adjudication, they shall designate a representative;where no representative is designated, the first person indicated in the trademark registration application or in the Trademark Register shall be the representative.The action of the representative to participate in the review and adjudication shall have effect on the interested parties he represents, but change of the representative, waiver of the review and adjudication request or acknowledgement of the other party's review and adjudication request must be authorized in writing by the interested parties represented.Rule 10 Where a foreign person or enterprise attending to matter of review and adjudication has habitual residence or place of business in China, he or it may entrust a qualified trademark agency authorised by the State with, or directly attend to, the matter.Where a foreign person or enterprise attending to the matter of review and adjudication does not have habitual residence or place of business in China, he or it shall entrust a qualified trademark agency authorised by the State.Where there is a change in the scope of power of agency, the agent relations terminate, or there is a change of agent, the interested party or its agent shall inform the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board in writing in a timely manner.Rule 11 Interested parties and agents may apply for consulting documents relevant to a case.Chapter II Application and Acceptance

Rule 12 Applications for trademark review and adjudication shall conform to the requirements as follows:(1)The applicants must be lawfully qualified subjects;(2)The applications are filed within the statutory time limit;(3)The applications fall within the scope of review and adjudication by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board;(4)Applications and the relevant proofs that conform to the requirement are submitted according to law;(5)There are specific requests, factual bases and grounds for the review and adjudication;and(6)The review and adjudication fees are paid according to law.Rule 13 To apply for trademark review and adjudication, one shall file an Application with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.If there is(are)a respondent/respondents, the applicant shall file as many copies of the Application as there are respondents.Where a trademark has been assigned or transferred and an application for the assignment has been filed with the Trademark Office, and not approved and published, the applicant shall submit relevant documents as proof.To apply for reexamination in respect of a decision or adjudication made by the Trademark Office, one shall also submit the Decision or Adjudication made by the Trademark Office along with the Application.Rule 14 Following information shall be indicated in the Application:(1)the applicant’s name, address of residence, mailing address, the name of the person to be contacted, and telephone number.Where the respondent(s)is(are)indicated in the review and adjudication application, the name and address thereof shall be indicated.Where a trademark agency is appointed to attend to the matter of the trademark review and adjudication, the name, mailing address, the name of the person to be contacted, and telephone number of the agency shall also be indicated.(2)the trademark in dispute and its application number or preliminary approval number, registration number and the issue number of the Trademark Gazette;(3)specific request for the review and adjudication, and the facts, grounds and legal bases for the request;Rule 15 Where a trademark review and adjudication application does not conform to any one of the requirements set forth in Rule 12(1),(2)and(3)of these Rules, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall not accept the application and shall notify the applicant in writing of the non-acceptance, and explain the reason.Rule 16 Where a trademark review and adjudication application does not conform to any one of the requirements set forth in Rule 12(4),(5)and(6)of these Rules or where the relevant certificates or proofs are not submitted according to the Implementing Regulations and these Rules, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the applicant to make rectification and require him to comply within 30 days from the date of receipt of the notification on rectification.Where an application remains contrary to the requirements upon rectification, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall not accept the application and shall notify the applicant in writing of the non-acceptance and explain the reason.Where no rectification is made at the expiration of the time limit, the review and adjudication application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn by the applicant and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the applicant in writing according to the provision of Article 30 of the Implementing Regulations.Rule 17 Where a trademark review and adjudication application conforms to the requirement for acceptance, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall issue to the applicant the Acceptance Notification within thirty days.Rule 18 In any one of the following circumstances, any trademark review and adjudication application that has been accepted by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board is deemed not to conform to the requirements for acceptance, and shall be refused according to Article 30 of the Implementing Regulations:(1)contrary to the provision of Article 42 of the Trademark Law in that against a trademark to which an opposition was raised and on which adjudication(on reexamination of the opposition)was made before it was approved of registration, an application for adjudication is filed on the basis of the same facts and grounds;(2)contrary to the provision of Article 35 of the Implementing Regulations in that an application for review and adjudication has been voluntarily withdrawn and the applicant files another application on the basis of the same facts and grounds thereafter;(3)contrary to the provision of Article 35 of the Implementing Regulations in that the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board has made adjudication or decision on an application for review and adjudication and the applicant files another application on the basis of the same facts and grounds;or(4)any other circumstance under which an application does not conform to the requirements for acceptance;The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, when rejecting a trademark review and adjudication application, shall notify the applicant in writing, and explain the reason.Rule 19 Where there is/are a respondent/respondents indicated in a Review and Adjudication Application, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, upon acceptance, shall forward the copies of the Application and the relevant proofs thereto in a timely manner, and require him/them to submit the Reply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board within thirty days from the date of receipt of the copy of the Application, and submit the same number of copies thereof as that of the applicants.Where a respondent does not submit a Reply or fails to submit the Reply before the expiration of the time limit, he shall be deemed to have given up making the Reply.Rule 20 Any interested party who needs to supplement relevant proofs after filing a Review and Adjudication Application or a Reply shall make a statement in the Application/Reply and submit altogether the same number of copies of the proofs as that of the Application/Reply within three months from the date of filing.Where the applicant/respondent does not make the statement or fails to submit the relevant proofs at the expiration of the time limit, he shall be deemed to have given up supplementing the relevant proofs, with the exception that the evidence is based on the new facts that occur after the expiration of the time limit or there is any other justifiable reason.Where there is an opposite party involved, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall communcate the proofs submitted by an interested party within the statutory time limit to the opposite party, and request him/it for cross-examination within a specified period of time.Rule 21 The applicant, when filing an Application or respondent, when filing a Reply, shall, meanwhile, submit valid certificates capable of proving his identification.The name of the applicant or the respondent shall be consistent with that indicated in the certificates submitted.Where there is a change in the name or address of an interested party, relevant proofs to this effect shall be submitted.Rule 22 The interested party shall categorise, number and list each proof he submits, briefly explain the source thereof, and specific facts of the evidence, and sign and seal them.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, after receiving the proofs submitted by an interested party, shall check the proofs according to the list thereof, and the staff member receiving the proofs shall sign his name on the receipt and indicate the date of submission.Rule 23 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Application and relevant proofs shall be filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Application and relevant proofs are not filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the applicant to make rectification, requiring him to do so within thirty dates from the date of receipt of the rectification notification.Failure for the amended Application and relevant proofs to conform to the prescription or failure to make the rectification at the expiration of the time limit shall be governed by Rule 16, paragraph two, of these Rules.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Reply and relevant proofs shall be filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Reply and relevant proofs are not filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the respondent to make rectification, requiring him to do so within thirty dates from the date of receipt of the rectification notification.Failure for the amended Reply and relevant proofs to conform to the prescription or failure to make the rectification at the expiration of the time limit shall not affect the review and adjudication by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.Chapter III Hearing

Rule 24 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall set up a collegial panel to hear a case of trademark review and adjudication.The collegial panel shall be composed of an odd number of more than three trademark review and adjudication examiners.In any one of the following circumstances, an individual trademark review and adjudication examiner may solely review and adjudicate a case:(1)where a trademark cited by the Trademark Office in its rejection decision or opposition adjudication has lost the exclusive right or the right of priority therein;(2)where a trademark of which a request for cancellation has been filed has lost the exclusive right therein;(3)where a trademark cited by the Trademark Office in its rejection decision is actually owned by an applicant, but rejected by the Trademark Office because the applicant fails to go through the formalities for a change in time, and the applicant applies, during the review and adjudication, to the Trademark Office to complete the formalities for the change;(4)where a third party’s trademark of prior filing or registration, cited by the Trademark Office in its rejection decision, has been approved to be assigned to the applicant during the review and adjudication;or(5)any other cases that may be under the sole review and adjudication by an individual trademark review and adjudication examiner.Rule 25 Where an interested party applies for the withdrawal of a trademark review and adjudication examiner according to the provision of Article 9 of the Implementing Regulations and Rule 7 of these Rules, the trademark review and adjudication examiner shall suspend his participation in the hearing of the case before the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board decides whether or not he should withdraw.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board receives an application for withdrawal from an interested party after it makes decision or adjudication, the validity of the review and adjudication decision or adjudication shall not be affected.However, where the review and adjudication examiner indeed needs to withdraw, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall treat the matter according to law.Rule 26 In respect of a party's application for withdrawal, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make its decision within seven days after the date of the receipt of the application, and notify the applicant in writing.Where an applicant is not satisfied with the decision on non-withdrawal made by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, it or he may apply for reconsideration once within three days after the date of the receipt of the decision.During the reconsideration, the trademark review and adjudication examiner whose withdrawal is requested shall not suspend his participation in the hearing of the case.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make its reconsideration decision within three days, and notify the reconsideration applicant in writing.Rule 27 In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with a decision by the Trademark Office on the rejection of trademark registration, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall, besides applying Articles 10, 11, 12 and 16, paragraph one, of the Trademark Law, review and adjudicate the case in connection with the rejection decision made by the Trademark Office, the facts of, grounds on, and requests for, the reexamination application by the applicant and the factual situation in the course of review and adjudication.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall listen to what the applicant has to say before making a decision according to the proceeding provision of this Rule.Rule 28 In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with an adjudication made by the Trademark Office on opposition, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the facts of, grounds on, and requests for, the reexamination application and reply made by the interested parties.Rule 29 In hearing a case of adjudication requested according to the provision of Article 41 of the Trademark Law on cancellation of a registered trademark, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the facts of, grounds on and requests for, the application and reply by the interested parties.Rule 30 In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with a decision by the Trademark Office on cancellation of a registered trademark according to the provision of Article 41, paragraph one, of the Trademark Law, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the decision made by the Trademark Office and the facts of, grounds on and requests for, the reexamination application by the applicant.In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with a decision on canceling or upholding of a registered trademark made by the Trademark Office according to the provisions of Articles 44 and 45 of the Trademark Law, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the facts, grounds and application of law on the basis of which the Trademark Office made the decision to cancel or uphold the registered trademark, except that an interested party to a case in which the reexamination has been applied for under Article 44(4)of the Trademark Law needs to submit additional evidence with justification.Rule 31 Where an interested party’s trademark right has been assigned or transferred during the trademark review and adjudication, the assignee or the transferee shall make a statement in writing on its or his assignee or transferee status in a timely manner, participate in the follow-up reexamination proceedings, and take the corresponding consequences.Rule 32 In any one of the following circumstances, the review and adjudication shall terminate:(1)where the applicant dies or terminates and there is no inheritor, or the inheritor abandons its or his right for review and adjudication;(2)where the applicant withdraws its or his application for review and adjudication;(3)where the interested parties reach an amicable agreement by themselves or through mediation by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board;or(4)any other circumstance requiring the termination of the review and adjudication.Where the review and adjudication terminates, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall close the case, notify the interested parties in writing, and explain the reason.Rule 33 The collegial panel shall put down in writing the case it hears, and the written record shall be signed by the members thereof.Where the members of a collegial panel are divided in their opinions, the divided opinions shall be indicated in the collegial record.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make decision or adjudication according to law on a case the examination of which has been closed.Rule 34 The following shall be indicated in the decision or adjudication by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board:(1)request for review and adjudication and facts at issue and grounds;(2)facts ascertained, reasons and grounds for the application of law in the decision or adjudication;(3)conclusion made in the decision or adjudication;(4)the follow-up procedure and time limit available to interested parties;and(5)date of the decision or adjudication.The decision or adjudication shall be signed by the members of the collegial panel and sealed by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.Rule 35 Where an interested party institutes proceedings in a people's court out of dissatisfaction with a decision or adjudication made by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, the interested party shall, at the time of submitting a complaint to the people’s court or within fifteen days from the date of the submission at the latest, send a copy of the complaint, or separately notify the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board in writing.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, within sixty days from the date of issuing its decision or adjudication, is not informed by the people’s court or any interested party of a lawsuit directed to the decision or adjudication, it shall be deemed that the interested party has not instituted legal proceedings in the court, and the decision or adjudication will be transferred to Trademark Office for enforcement.Rule 36 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may, at the request of an interested party or according to practical needs, decide to conduct a public review and adjudication of the application therefor.Rule 37 If an interested party requests for public review and adjudication, he shall give specific reasons that the public review and adjudication is necessary.Rule 38 An applicant requesting for the public review and adjudication shall file the request in writing with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board within fifteen days from the date of receipt of the copy of the Reply made by the respondent;and a respondent requesting for the public review and adjudication shall file the request together with the submission to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the Reply or additional relevant proofs.Rule 39 Specific procedures for public review and adjudication will be separately set forth by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.Chapter IV Rules on Evidence

Rule 40 An interested party shall be under the burden of proof to testify the facts on the basis of which he requests for the review and adjudication or on the basis of which one rebuts the other party's review and adjudication request.Where there is no evidence or there is not sufficient evidence to attest to the factual claims by an interested party, the interested party under the burden of proof shall bear the adverse consequences.Where one interested party expressly acknowledges the facts in a case as stated by the other party, the latter is not under the burden of proof.The other party's neither acknowledging nor denying the facts claimed by an interested party shall be deemed acknowledgement thereof.Where an interested party appoints an attorney to attend the review and adjudication, the attorney's admission shall be deemed the interested party's admission, except that the attorney's unauthorized admission of any facts directly results in the admission of the other party’s review and adjudication request.The interested party’s failure to express objection to its or his attorney's admission on site shall be deemed to be the the interested party’s admission.Rule 41 An interested party does not need to adduce evidence to prove the following facts:(1)facts known to all;(2)facts deducted from the law;(3)facts proven according to the law;(4)facts deducted on the basis of experience and laws of the daily life;and(5)other facts in respect of which adduction of evidence is not required under the law.except that an interested party has evidence to the contrary which is sufficient to upset the facts.Rule 42 An interested party who furnishes the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board with documentary evidence shall furnish the original, including the original text, the authentic text, and the copy.The interested party who has difficulty furnishing the original may furnish the corresponding Xerox copies, photographs or extracts.Where the furnished documents are Xerox copies, photographs or extracts of the original documentary evidence kept by a relevant department, the sources shall be indicated, and the documents be sealed by the department upon verification.An interested party who furnishes the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board with material evidence shall furnish the original material.The interested party who has difficulty furnishing the original may furnish the corresponding reproduction or other evidence such as photographs or video-recordings of said material evidence.Where the original is of relatively many varieties, a part thereof shall be furnished.Where an interested party has doubt about the Xerox copies or photographs of the documentary evidence and material evidence furnished by the other party, and has relevant proofs in support of the doubt, or where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board deems necessary, the doubted interested party shall furnish or show the original or the notarised copy of the relevant evidence.Article 43 Where the evidence furnished by an interested party to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board is evolved outside the territory of the People’s Republic of China, or in the region of Hong Kong, Macau or Taiwan and where the other party has doubt for its authenticity and has relevant proofs in support of the doubt, or where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board deems necessary, the evidence shall be notarized and or legalized according to the relevant regulations.Rule 44 Where an interested party furnishes to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board instruments or explanatory material in a foreign language, he shall attach the Chinese translation thereof.Where an interested party who has furnished evidence in a foreign language fails to submit the Chinese translation thereof, the evidence in the foreign language shall be deemed not to have been submitted.Where the other party has objection to the specific content of the translation, he shall submit the Chinese translation of the part to which the objection is raised.If necessary, an entity accepted by both parties may be entrusted with the translation of the entire text or the part of the text which has been used or to which objection has been raised.Where both parties fail to reach an agreement on the translation entrustment, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may entrust a professional translation entity with the translation of the entire text or the part of the text which has been used or to which objection has been raised.Each party shall bear 50 percent of the fees necessary for the entrusted translation.A party's refusal to pay the translation fee shall be deemed its acceptance of the translation submitted by the other party.Rule 45 A single piece of evidence may be verified and confirmed as to the presence and strength of evidential force in relation to the following aspects:(1)whether the evidence is the original text, original material;whether the copy or reproduction of the evidence is consistent with the original;(2)whether the evidence is relevant to the facts of a case;(3)whether the evidence conforms to the law in terms of form or source;(4)whether the evidence is true in content;and(5)whether the witness or the person furnishing the evidence has interest in an interested party.Rule 46 The review and adjudication examiners shall comprehensively examine and evaluate all the evidence as to the degree of relevance of the various pieces of the evidence to the facts of a case and the relationship of these pieces of evidence.Rule 47 The following evidence alone shall not serve as the basis for ascertaining facts in a case:(1)oral evidence from a minor which does not match his age or intelligence;(2)oral evidence in favour of one interested party from a witness who is a relative, affiliate or otherwise closely related to the interested party or oral evidence against one interested party from a witness who is adversely-related thereto;(3)oral evidence from a witness who should attend the public review and adjudication but fails to without justification;(4)Audiovisual reference material difficult to be detected as to whether it is modified or not;(5)Copy or reproduction impossible to be verified with the original;(6)Proofs which one party or another person has modified and which the other party does not accept;and(7)Any other proofs that, alone, cannot serve as the basis for ascertaining the facts in a case.Rule 48 The following evidence furnished by an interested party, to which the other party objects but fails to rebut with sufficient evidence to the contrary, shall be established by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board as having its evidential force:(1)the original documentary evidence or the Xerox copies, photographs, copies or extracts thereof which are verified to be consistent with the original documentary evidence;(2)the original material evidence or the copies, photographs or video-recording materials thereof which are verified to be consistent with the original material evidence;(3)the audiovisual reference material which is supported by other evidence and obtained by legal means and free of any doubt or the reproduction thereof verified without any inconsistency found.Rule 49 Where a appraisal conclusion made by an appraisal organisation with entrustment by an interested party is not rebutted by the other party with sufficient evidence and reason to the contrary, the evidential force of the appraisal conclusion may be confirmed.Rule 50 In respect of the evidence one interested party has furnished and the other party accepts or fails to rebut with sufficient evidence to the contrary, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may confirm its evidential force.Where in respect of the evidence one interested party has furnished, the other party has objection thereto and presents evidence to rebut it, and the opposite party accepts the rebutting evidence, the evidential force of the rebutting evidence may be confirmed.Rule 51 Where both parties furnish evidence to the contrary in respect of the same fact, neither has sufficient ground for the denial of the evidence of the other party, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall evaluate, considering the circumstances of a case, whether or not the evidence furnished by one party is obviously more valid in evidential force than that by the other party, and confirm the evidence carrying more valid evidential force.Where it is impossible to evaluate the evidential force of the evidence, and, as a result, it is difficult to ascertain the facts in dispute, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make determination according to the doctrine for distribution of burden of proof.Rule 52 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall confirm the facts and evidence which are unfavorable to an interested party, but have been accepted by the interested party in its or his Application, Reply, Written Statement, or statements made by his appointed attorney in the course of review and adjudication, except that the party goes back on his words and has sufficient evidence to the contrary to rebut them.Rule 53 Where an interested party has made his own statement of, but cannot furnish other relevant evidence to back up, his claim, the claim shall not be supported, except that the other party otherwise accepts the claim.Rule 54 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may determine the evidential force of several pieces of evidence as to the same fact according to the following principles:(1)Documents and instruments prepared, ex officio, by a State agency and any other competent department prevail over other documentary evidence;(2)Appraisal conclusions, materials kept on file and notarized or registered documentary evidence prevail over other documentary evidence, audiovisual reference evidence and oral evidence from a witness;(3)Original documents or materials prevail over copies or reproductions;(4)Appraisal conclusions made by statutory appraisal departments prevail over those by other appraisal departments;(5)Original evidence prevails over derivative evidence;(6)Oral evidence of other witnesses prevails over oral evidence, in favor of an interested party, from a witness who is a relative or otherwise closely related to the party;(7)Oral evidence from a participant of the public review and adjudication prevails over that from a non-participant;and(8)Several pieces of evidence variant in category and consistent in content prevail over a single isolated piece of evidence.Chapter V Time Limit and Service

Rule 55 The time limit includes the statutory time limit and that fixed by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.The time limit is counted in days, months and years.The beginning day of a time limit is not counted.Where the last day on which a time limit expires is a public holiday, the first workday following the public holiday is the date on which the time limit expires.Rule 56 Where any document or material is sent to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, the date of receipt shall be the date of delivery where it is delivered personally, or the date of posting indicated by the postmark if it is sent by post;where the date of posting indicated by the postmark is illegible, or there is no postmark, the date of receipt shall be the date on which the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board actually receives the document or material, except that the interested party is able to present evidence as to the actual date of posting indicated by the postmark.Rule 57 Any document of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may be served by post, by personal delivery or by other means.Where an interested party entrusts a trademark agency, delivery of the document to the trademark agency shall be deemed delivery thereof to the interested party.Where any document is sent to an interested party by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, the date of receipt shall be the date of receipt indicated by the postmark on which the interested party receives it if it is sent by post;where the date of posting indicated by the postmark is illegible, or where there is no postmark, or it is not returned to the addressor by the Post Office the document shall be deemed to have been delivered to the interested party on the fifteenth day from the date of posting the document;the date of receipt shall be the date of delivery if it is delivered personally.Where any document cannot be sent by post or by personal delivery, the document may be served through publication on the Trademark Gazette.At the expiration of the thirtieth day from the date of the publication, the document shall be deemed to have been served.Rule 58 Where an interested party is a foreign person or enterprise having no habitual residence or place of business in China, the trademark agency acting on its or his behalf as indicated in the relevant official record of trademark registration shall receive, with acknowledgement, the delivered legal documents in relation to the trademark in the proceedings of trademark review and adjudication;delivery of the documents to the trademark agency shall be deemed delivery thereof to the interested party.Where a trademark agency has terminated its agent relation with the relevant foreign interested party before the delivery of the legal documents mentioned in the preceding paragraph, it shall inform in writing the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board about it, and return the legal documents, within ten days from the receipt thereof, to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for another service to the proper addressee.Where a trademark of international registration under the Madrid system involves communication of the relevant forms and documents by the International Bureau, proof of service of the documents shall be submitted.If no such proof is furnished, the reason shall be explained in writing, and the forms and documents shall be deemed to have been served at the expiration of the fifteenth day from the date of issuance thereof by the International Bureau.If a document can not be delivered by any of the above means, it will be served through publication on the Trademark Gazette.Chapter VI Supplementary Provisions

Rule 59 The circumstances having arisen before entry into force of the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law on 1 December 2001 that are listed in Articles 4, 5, 8, 9, paragraph one, 10, paragraph one(2),(3)and(4), 10, paragraph two, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 24, 25 and 31 of the revised Trademark Law and that the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board reviewed and adjudicated after entry into force of the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law shall be reviewed and adjudicated pursuant to the relevant provisions of the revised Trademark Law.In respect of other circumstances, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall apply the relevant provisions of the former Trademark Law to the review and adjudication thereof.Where an interested party applies to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review and adjudication in respect of a dispute over a trademark that had been registered for a year when the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law entered into force, the time limit for filing the application provided for in Article 27, paragraph two, of the former Trademark Law shall apply.Where an interested party applies to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review and adjudication in respect of a dispute over a trademark that had been registered for less than a year when the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law entered into force, the time limit for filing the application provided for in Article 41, paragraph three, of the revised Trademark Law shall apply in handling the application to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review and adjudication.Where an relevant entity or person files an application for review and adjudication according to the provisions of Article 27 of the former Trademark Law and Rule 25 of the Implementing Regulations thereof before entry into force of the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law, and the application falls into the provisions of Articles 13, 15, 16 or 31 of the revised Trademark Law, the provision for the time limit for filing application for review and adjudication of Article 41, paragraph two, of the revised Trademark Law does not apply.Rule 60 The documents or forms for handling review and adjudication matters shall be formulated and published by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce.Rule 61 The State Administration for Industry and Commerce shall be responsible for the interpretation of these Rules.Rule 62 These Rules shall enter into force on 26 October 2005.31

第二篇：商標術語中英文對照

商標術語中英文對照

知識產權 INTELLECTURL PROPERTY 工業(yè)產權 INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY 外觀設計 DESIGN 發(fā)明 INVENTION 發(fā)明人 INVENTOR 貨源標記 INDICATION OF SOURCE 原產地名稱 APPELLATION OF ORIGIN（AOS）地理標記 GEOPRAPHICAL INDICATION（GIS）世界貿易組織《WTO》 WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION 關稅及貿易總協定《GATT》 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE 亞太經濟合作組織《APEC》 ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION 與貿易有關的知產權協議《TRIPS》 AGREEMENT ON TRADE RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 世界知識產權組織《WIPO》 WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION 保護知識產權聯合國際局 INTERNATIONAL BOARD OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT 保護工業(yè)產權巴黎公約 PARIS CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY 商標際注冊馬德里協定 MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS 商標注冊條約《TRT》 TRADE MARK REGISTRATION TREATY 商注冊用商品與國際分類尼斯協定 NICE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSFICATION OF GGODS AND SERVICES FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE REGISTRATION OF MARKS 建立商標圖形要素國際分類維也納協定 VIENNA AGREEMENT FR ESTABLISHING AND INTERNATIONAL CLASSFICATION OF THE FIGURATIVE ELEMENTS OF MARKS 專利合作條約《PCT》 PATENT CO－OPERATION TREATY 共同體專利公約 COMMUNITY產PATENT CONVENTION 斯特拉斯堡協定《SA》 STRASBOURG AGREEMENT 工業(yè)外觀設計國際保存海協定 THE HAGUE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL DEPOSIT OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS 工業(yè)外觀設計國際分類洛迦諾協定 LOCARNO GREEMENT ON ESTABLISHING AND INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS 商標，外觀設計與地理標記法律常設委員會（SCT）STANDING COMMITTE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS，INDUSTRIAL DESIGN AND GERGRAPHICAL INDICATION 國際專利文獻中心《INPADOC》 INTERNATIONAL PATENT DOCUMENTATION CENTER 歐洲專利局《EPO》 EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE 歐洲專利公約 EUROPEAN PATENT CONVENTION 比荷盧商標局 TRADE MARK OFFIICE OF BELGIUM－HOLLAND－LUXEMBURG 法語非洲知識產權組織 ORGANIZATION OF AFRICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 國際商標協會 THE INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION 中華人民共和國商標法 TTRADEMARK LAW OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA 英國商標法 TRADEMARK LAW OF UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND 美國商標法 TRADEMARK LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1 日本商標法 JAPANESE TRADEMARK LAW 商標 TRADE MARK

商標局 TRADE MARK OFFICCE 商標法 TRADEMARK LAW 文字商標 WORD MARK 圖形商標 FIGURATIVE MARK 組合商標 ASSOCIATED MARK 保證商標 CERTIFICATION MARK 集體商標 COLLECTIVE MARK 馳名商標 WELL－KNOWN MARK 著名商標 FAMOUYS MARK近似商標 SIMILAR MARK 防御商標 DEFENSIVE MARK 服務標記 SERVICE MARK 注冊商標 REGISTERED MARK 商標注冊申請人 TRADE MARK REGISTRANT 注冊申請日 APPLICATION DATE OF TRADE MARK 注冊申請?zhí)?APPLICATION NUMBER 商標注冊證 TRADE MARK REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE 商標注冊號 TRADE MARK REGISTRATION NUMBER 商標注冊日 TRADE MARK REGISTRATION DATE 商標注冊簿 TRADE MARK REGISTERED BOOK 注冊有效期 THE TERM OF VALIDITY 商標注冊官 EXAMINATION FOR TRADE MARK REGISTRATION 注冊查詢 TRADE MARK ENQUIRIES 注冊續(xù)展 RENEWAL OF TRADE MARK 分別申請 SEPARATE APPLICATION 重新申請 NEW REGISTRATION 別行申請 NEW APPLICATION 變更申請 APPLICATION REGARDING CHANGES 注冊代理 TRADE MARK AGENCY 注冊公告 TRADE MARK PUBLICATION 申請注冊 APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION 續(xù)展注冊 RENEWAL OF REGISTRATION 轉讓注冊 REGISTRATION OF ASSIGNMENT 變更注人名義／地址／其它注冊事項 MODIFICATION OF NAME／ADDRESS OF REGISTRANT／OTHER MATTERS 補發(fā)商標證書 REISSUANCE OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE 注銷注冊商標 REMOVAL 證明 CERTIFICATION 異議 OPPOSITION 使用許可合同備案 RECORDAL OF LICENSE CONTRACT 駁回商標復審 REVIEW OF REFUSED TRADEMARK 駁回續(xù)展復審 REVIEW OF REFUSED RENEWAL

駁回轉讓復審 REVIEW OF REFUSED ASSIGNMENT 撤銷商標復審 REVIEW OF ADJUDICATION ON OPPOSITION 異議復審 REVIEW OF ADJUDICATION ON OPPOSITION 爭議裁定 ADJUDICATION ON DISPUTED REGISTERED TRADEMARK 撤銷注冊不當裁定 ADJUDICATION ON CANCELLATION OF IMPROPERLY REGISTERED TRADEMARK 撤銷注冊不當復審 REVIEW ON CANCELLATION OF IMPROPERLY REGISTERED TRADEMARK 處理商標糾紛案件 DEALING WITH INFRINGEMENT 優(yōu)先權 PRIORITY 注冊申請優(yōu)先日 DATE OF PRIORITY 注冊商標使用人 USER OF REGISTERED TRADE MARK 注冊商標專用權 EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE REGISTERED TRADE MARK 注冊商標的轉讓 ASSIGNMENT OF REGISTERED TRADE MARK 商標的許可使用 LICENSING OF REGISTERED TRADE MARK 使用在先原則 PRINCIPLE OF FIRST TO USE 注冊在先原則 PRINCIPLE OF FIRST APPLICATION 商標國際分類 INTERNATIONAL CLASSFICATION OF GOODS 專利 PATENT 專利權 PATENT RIGHT 專利權人 PATENTEE 專利代理 PATENT AGENCY 產品專利 PRODUCT PATENT 專利性 PATENTABLITY 專利申請權 RIGHT TO APPLY FOR A PATENT 實用新穎 UTILITY MODEL 專有性 MONOPOLY 專利的新穎性 NOVELTY OF PATENT 專利的實用性 PRACTICAL APPLICABILITY 專利的創(chuàng)造性 INVENTIVE 專利文件 PATENT DOCUMENT 專利申請文件 PATENT APPLICATION DOCUMENT 專利請求書 PATENT REQUEST 專利說明書 PATENT SPECIFICATION 專利要求書 PATENT CLAIM 專利證書 LETTER OF PATENT 商標淡化法 TRADEMARK DILUTION ACT 商標權的權利窮竭 EXHAUSTION TRADEMARK 平行進口 PARALLEL IMPORT 灰色進口 GRAY IMPORT 反向假冒 REVERSE PASSING－OFF 顯行反向假冒 EXPRESS REVERSE PASSING－OFF 隱形反向假冒 IMPLIED REVERSE PASSING－OFF 附帶使用 COLLATERAL USE 3

第三篇：質量評審技術術語 中英文對照

A

AC 允收

AFR Annualized Failure Rate

APQP Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan 產品質量先期策劃 AQL 可接收質量水平

AVL Approved Vendor List合格供應商目錄

B

C

C＝0 零缺陷接收抽樣案

CA Corrective Action

CET Customer Experience Test

CAR 改正措施報告

CLCA Closed Loop Corrective Action循環(huán)改善措施（8D格式 問題描述－應急處理－根本原因分析－短期糾正措施－長期預防措施－效果追蹤－效果確認及標準化－教育訓練）CR 嚴重缺點

CIP Continuous Improvement Program 持續(xù)改善

CPK 制程能力指數

CQA 顧客品質保證

Customer Complaint 客戶抱怨

D

DOE Design of Experiments 實驗設計（對關鍵控制因素設計實驗，包括實驗的種類，步驟和影響因素）

DOE Dorian Shainin 謝寧DOE 美國人 七種DOE應用技術：多變圖，零件搜索，成對比

較，變量搜索，完全析因，改進效果檢查，實驗設計的回歸分析

（戴明――美國質量哲學，朱蘭――美國質量方向，謝寧――美國解決質量問題方法）DPPM：每百萬的不良數量

DQA 新產品開發(fā)質量保證

DVT

Design Verification Test

E

ECN Engineering Change Notice 工程變更通知書

EVT Engineering Verification Test

F

FAE Field Application Engineer

FAI First Article Inspection首件檢驗

Field Service市場服務

Field Reject Rate 市場不良率

FMEA Failure Mode Effect Analysis失效模式分析（1.DFMEA: 設計失效模式及后果分析

2.PFMEA: 過程失效模式及后果分析）

FQC 最終檢驗

G

GP 綠色產品（綠色伙伴環(huán)境品質認定）

GQAMGlobal Quality Account Manager

GSQE/WWSQE Global or World Wide Supplier Quality Engineer

Gauge R&R計量器具的重復性與重現性

H

HSE健康（Health）、安全（Safety）和環(huán)境(Environment）三位一體的管理體系。危害識別和風險控制是HSE管理核心所在。

I

IFIR Initial Field Incident Rate初始市場不良率（前30天）

IQC Incoming Quality Control來料質量控制（進貨檢驗員）

IPQC 制程檢驗

J

JQE Joint Quality Engineer項目協調員

K

L

Lead Time 供應周期時間

Lean Management 精益管理

Line Reject Rate 生產線不良率

M

5M1E 人、機器、材料、方法、量測、環(huán)境

MA 主要缺點

MI 次要缺點

MIT Monitor IFIR Test

MTBF Mean Time Between Failure

MQA 制造品質保證

MSA Measurement System Analysis 測量系統(tǒng)分析（工具：數理統(tǒng)計和圖表）N

NPI 新產品導入

NPRR 新產品準備會

O

OBA Out of Box Audit

On Time Delivery：及時交貨

OSD On Screen Display

ORT 可靠性測試

OQC Outgoing Quality Control最終檢驗控制程序

Overall Supply Capability 綜合供應能力

P

PA Preventive Action

PCBA Printed Circuit Board Assembly

PCNProcess Change Notification

PDG Product Development Group

PPID Piece Part Identification

PPAP Production Parts Approval Process生產件批準程序

PPM 交付質量

PID Production Induce Defect 生產方缺陷（生產線自身造成）

poka-yoke 防錯

Q

QA 品質保證

QBR 季度業(yè)務審查

QC 質量控制

QIT Quality Improvement Team 質量改進小組

QMP Quality Management Plan 品質管理計劃

Quality System Audit 品質系統(tǒng)稽核

Quality Process Audit 品質過程稽核

R

RE 拒收

RSQE Regional Supplier Quality Engineer

RTS Ready To Ship

Repair Rework Replacement 3R 返修 返工 更換

5RRight Time 適時Right Quality 適質Right Quantity 適量 Right Price 適價Right Place 始地

RMA 客戶退回維修水平

RPN(risk priority number)風險系數

S

SMART（Specific特定性 Measurable 度量性 Achievable 可達性 Relevant 相關性 Time Bound 時間性）

6Sigma 六西格瑪品質管理 每百萬個機會里的誤差：4Sigma 6210次 6Sigma 3次 1986年摩托羅拉比爾史密斯提出，90年代通用電氣杰克韋爾奇全面完善發(fā)展

SPC Statistical Process Control統(tǒng)計過程控制 利用統(tǒng)計技術對過程的各個階段監(jiān)控 1920S美國休哈特提出

SQE Supplier Quality Engineer 供應商質量工程師

SQS 供應商質量標準

Supplier 供應商

－Leverage Supplier 杠桿型供應商（采購方主導 常規(guī)物料）

－Routine Supplier 例行供應商（配套供應）

－Strategic Supplier 戰(zhàn)略供應商（市場領導者）

－Bottleneck Supplier 瓶頸供應商（供應商主導）

T

TQC 全面質量控制

U

V

VID Vendor Induce Defect 賣方缺陷

VLRR Verify Lots Reject Rate 確認的批退率

VQA 供應商質量保證

VRR供應商供貨批退率(主要指進料的批退率）

W

5W1H（what事件when時間where地點who誰why為什么how怎樣）

X

Y

Z

第四篇：中英文對照

Text5_EN

I don't know why I overlooked that problem.I haven't overlooked Chinese achievements in science.Sometimes you are too frank.High birthrates cannot be changed overnight.That book only told a pack of lies.They searched my room and found nothing.When it rained people in that small town had to stay in the house.

第五篇：中英文對照

AEROFLEX “亞羅弗”保溫 ALCO “艾科”自控 Alerton 雅利頓空調 Alfa laval阿法拉伐換熱器 ARMSTRONG “阿姆斯壯”保溫 AUX 奧克斯

BELIMO 瑞士“搏力謀”閥門 BERONOR西班牙“北諾爾”電加熱器 BILTUR 意大利“百得”燃燒器 BOSIC “柏誠”自控 BROAD 遠大

Burnham美國“博恩漢”鍋爐 CALPEDA意大利“科沛達”水泵 CARLY 法國“嘉利”制冷配件 Carrier 開利 Chigo 志高

Cipriani 意大利斯普萊力

CLIMAVENETA意大利“克萊門特” Copeland“谷輪”壓縮機 CYRUS意大利”賽諾思”自控 DAIKIN 大金空調

丹佛斯自控 Dorin “多菱”壓縮機

DUNHAM-BUSH 頓漢布什空調制冷 DuPont美國“杜邦”制冷劑 Dwyer 美國德威爾 EBM “依必安”風機

ELIWELL意大利“伊力威”自控 Enfinilan 英國“英菲尼蘭“閥門 EVAPCO美國“益美高”冷卻設備 EVERY CONTROL意大利“美控” Erie 怡日

FRASCOLD 意大利“富士豪”壓縮機 FRICO瑞典“弗瑞克”空氣幕 FUJI “富士”變頻器

FULTON 美國“富爾頓”鍋爐 GENUIN “正野”風機 GREE 格力

GREENCOOL格林柯爾 GRUNDFOS “格蘭富”水泵 Haier 海爾 Hisense 海信 HITACHI 日立

霍尼韋爾自控 Johnson 江森自控 Kelon 科龍

KRUGER瑞士“科祿格”風機 KU BA德國“庫寶”冷風機 Liang Chi 良機冷卻塔 LIEBERT 力博特空調 MARLEY “馬利”冷卻塔 Maneurop法國“美優(yōu)樂”壓縮機 McQuary 麥克維爾 Midea 美的 MITSUBISHI三菱

Munters 瑞典“蒙特”除濕機 Panasonic 松下 RANCO “宏高”自控

REFCOMP意大利“萊富康”壓縮機 RIDGID 美國“里奇”工具 RUUD美國“路德”空調 RYODEN “菱電”冷卻塔 SanKen “三墾”變頻器 Samsung 三星 SANYO 三洋

ASWELL英國森威爾自控 Schneider 施耐德電氣 SenseAir 瑞典“森爾”傳感器 SIEMENS 西門子

SINKO ",28商機網;新晃“空調 SINRO “新菱”冷卻塔 STAND “思探得”加濕器 SWEP 舒瑞普換熱器 TECKA “臺佳”空調 Tecumseh“泰康”壓縮機 TRANE 特靈

TROX德國“妥思”風閥 VASALA芬蘭“維薩拉”傳感器 WILO德國“威樂”水泵 WITTLER 德國”威特”閥門 YORK 約克

ZENNER德國“真蘭”計量