第一篇：英語辯論——環(huán)境保護VS經(jīng)濟發(fā)展

英語辯論——環(huán)境保護VS經(jīng)濟發(fā)展(經(jīng)濟發(fā)展正方）

Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正方一辯陳詞： we think it’s economy growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方一辯陳詞：We agree economic growth is needed.But the environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.That’s all I want to say.反方二辯：請問對方二辯，經(jīng)濟是一時之事，環(huán)境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經(jīng)濟 發(fā)展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環(huán)境沒了，還能生存嗎？?My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the?environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點是優(yōu)先權(quán)。并不是說經(jīng) 濟優(yōu)先就不搞環(huán)保了，只是環(huán)保處于較次的位置，Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy?development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the?environmental protection is just in the inferior position.、反方三辯：請問正方三辯，如果發(fā)展經(jīng)濟優(yōu)先的話，很可能造成環(huán)境成本大于經(jīng) 濟效益的情況，這樣的經(jīng)濟是發(fā)展還是倒退？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely?the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?

正方三辯： 這種情況確實有存在，但并不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業(yè)情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經(jīng)濟效益是負的，那我們改 行環(huán)境保護優(yōu)先，就能轉(zhuǎn)虧為盈？我不這么覺得。This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.反方四辯：你的問題未免抽象了點?？萍及l(fā)展無止盡，經(jīng)濟發(fā)展也沒盡頭，但是環(huán)境保護是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, But environmental protection is?imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方四辯：請問反方四辯，經(jīng)濟發(fā)展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內(nèi)容，包括衣食 住行娛樂，這難道不是現(xiàn)在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the?people's universal desire?

反方一辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既 能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環(huán)境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment

正方一辯： 請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環(huán)境保護工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們 經(jīng)濟發(fā)展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的 意思我們應(yīng)該回歸這種生活嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

正方總結(jié)：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth”.I think what they said can’t come true at present.It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy.反方總結(jié): Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy”.The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future.If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life ？

第二篇：英語辯論——環(huán)境保護VS經(jīng)濟發(fā)展

英語辯論——環(huán)境保護VS經(jīng)濟發(fā)展(經(jīng)濟發(fā)展正方）

Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正方一辯陳詞：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, we think it’s economy growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方一辯陳詞：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.That’s all I want to say.自由辯論

正方二辯：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty good, there are thousands people lack of money for the food the need to live.Then, opponent debaters, do you think we still need to develop our economies?

反方二辯：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of China have solved the problem of food and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern China is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?

正方三辯：There do exist some eastern cities whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that China has 130 million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole China.We know that environment protection need high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.反方三辯：Environmental protection needs economy.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.The policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the

environment.Doses it show that the environmental protection is more important?

正方四辯：Opponent debaters have referred the returning farmland to forest policy.We admit our country has paid a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit.But we should still take economic construction as the central task.反方四辯：We admit economic construction is our country’s principle task.But we have to insist on sustainable development while developing economy.We must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic development.總結(jié)：

正方總結(jié)：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth”.I think what they said can’t come true at present.It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy.反方總結(jié): Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy”.The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future.If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect, which lead to sea-level rises.As a result, thousands of coastal dweller has to face the fate of the migration.Moreover, the opponent also said,” when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want to question that when the animals and plants have died out, what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy.If the economic growth delays for two years, we can wait two years to develop it.But, if the environmental protection delays two years, the species will be extinct, the resources will exhaust.The urgency like this can’t wait.So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China.Thank you.補充及參考材料

二辯盤問 Two debate questioned 反方二辯：請問對方二辯，經(jīng)濟是一時之事，環(huán)境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經(jīng)濟 發(fā)展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環(huán)境沒了，還能生存嗎？?My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the?environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點是優(yōu)先權(quán)。并不是說經(jīng) 濟優(yōu)先就不搞環(huán)保了，只是環(huán)保處于較次的位置，跟中國現(xiàn)狀一樣，政策雖 然說要重視環(huán)保，但一般縣區(qū)還是經(jīng)濟發(fā)展優(yōu)先的，也就有資本的大城市才 比較重視搞環(huán)保，相信大家心知肚明?Sorry, I'm

afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy?development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the?environmental protection is just in the inferior position.Just like the present China,?although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely?take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.反方二辯：請問正方三辯，如果發(fā)展經(jīng)濟優(yōu)先的話，很可能造成環(huán)境成本大于經(jīng) 濟效益的情況，這樣的經(jīng)濟是發(fā)展還是倒退？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely?the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up? 正方三辯： 這種情況確實有存在，但并不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業(yè)情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經(jīng)濟效益是負的，那我們改 行環(huán)境保護優(yōu)先，就能轉(zhuǎn)虧為盈？我不這么覺得。to cause This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.正方二辯： 我們知道環(huán)境的保護是預(yù)防為主，防治結(jié)合，而預(yù)防和治理都要依 靠技術(shù)的發(fā)展，那請問對方二辯，如果沒有強有力的經(jīng)濟基礎(chǔ)支持科學(xué)技術(shù) 發(fā)展，那么以科技為支撐的環(huán)保從何談起呢？?We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.反方二辯：你的問題未免抽象了點?？萍及l(fā)展無止盡，經(jīng)濟發(fā)展也沒盡頭，什么 時候算得上是“強有力”呢？但是環(huán)境保護是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is?imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方二辯：請問反方三辯，經(jīng)濟發(fā)展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內(nèi)容，包括衣食 住行娛樂，這難道不是現(xiàn)在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the?people's universal desire? 反方三辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既 能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環(huán)境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment?自由辯論 正方一辯： 請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環(huán)境保護工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們 經(jīng)濟發(fā)展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的 意思我們應(yīng)該回歸這種生活嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning??反方一辯：人類祖先確實需要發(fā)展經(jīng)濟，但若是在這個過程中砍完了森林，污染 了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發(fā)展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是 經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的泄漏帶來了環(huán)境的極度惡化，請問 你怎么看？?Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer.What I want to ask is, nuclear power station is the

outcome of the economic development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it??正方二辯：首先，我方并沒有承諾經(jīng)濟發(fā)展就一定會破壞到環(huán)境；其次，對方所 說的情況只是鳳毛麟角；第三，核電站泄漏是科技不力，而經(jīng)濟是科學(xué)研究 的基礎(chǔ)。First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment;second, the situation you said is only rare;third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not strong.But economy is the foundation?of scientific research.反方二辯：但是核電站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么辦？沒有了這 些，我們的生活怎么辦？你愿意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之 間？?But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries??正方三辯：但是對方辯友請注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活 用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機器可以運作，生產(chǎn)可以興起，環(huán)境總會有 辦法彌補，我也想問，你愿意生活在兩小時停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之 處？ Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of people's living power.With the electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the?environment.I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.反方三辯：你的意思是破壞了環(huán)境然后再去彌補。為什么要先污染后治理？為什 么要兜這么大一個圈子呢？而且我國的經(jīng)濟建設(shè)里程已經(jīng)證明，先污染后治 理是錯的，行不通的。You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it.Why management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.正方四辯：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站泄漏了，嚴重污染 了環(huán)境，而我方堅信是可以挽救的。而且事實上，包括核電站在內(nèi)的很多工 業(yè)廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們在搞經(jīng)濟的同時，并沒有放棄環(huán)境的保護。I can not but say that we are really undeserved.It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved.And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.反方四辯：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無法保證無污染，這樣日積 月累下來，依然會是一片慘狀。必須把環(huán)境保護放在第一位，每個工廠都嚴 抓，才能從根本上阻止環(huán)境的惡化。But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution.As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation.So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening fundamentally.正方三辯：對方辯友請從事實出發(fā)，經(jīng)濟發(fā)展必然會付出代價，我們已經(jīng)在努力 使代價降到最低。Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.反方三辯：降低應(yīng)該有個標準吧，這不是你我能定的，是自然環(huán)境定的，等到他 揭示這個標準時，只怕為時已晚了。Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.

第三篇：英語辯論環(huán)境保護與經(jīng)濟發(fā)展

Which should receive priority in china? Environmental protection or economic growth.：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environmental protection or

economic growth should take priority in china;we think its economy growth should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.：First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed countries, so the urgent

affair of china is to develop our economy.：Second, Economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop

our economy without environmental pollution.：Third, when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on

environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in china.：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of

“first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.：What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much by this means, it placed us in a

completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.：So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past, which is to say, in the course of

development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty

good, but there are thousands people lack of money for the food or clothes.Even in the city like Dalian, how many people can’t afford of the expensive price of house.Do you think the problems like these can be solved by environmental protection?

：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of china have solved the problem of food

and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern china is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?

：Some eastern cities do exist whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that china has 130

million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole china.We know that environment protection need high-technology, high-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.：Environmental protection needs money.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.：Economic growth is important, environmental protection is also important.And our government has

already realized the importance of the balance between the two parts, and did achieve some

good results.I think in the future there will be on a win-win situation in the economic and

environmental protection.

第四篇：經(jīng)濟發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護辯論數(shù)據(jù)

數(shù)據(jù)：

1、胡錦濤總書記在中央黨校的重要講話中說，現(xiàn)在我們發(fā)展上快的問題解決了，但好的問

題并未解決好。

2、污染數(shù)據(jù)：江河水系70%受到污染，流經(jīng)城市90%以上嚴重污染，城市垃圾處理率不足

20%，農(nóng)村1.5億噸垃圾露天存放，三億多農(nóng)民喝不到干凈的水，四億多城市居民呼吸不到新鮮空氣。

3、社會問題：2005年中國發(fā)生5.1萬起環(huán)境糾紛，40萬人次投訴和上訪，而且以30%的速

度在遞增。污染嚴重影響人體健康，早已引起人民群眾的不滿，環(huán)境不公平，也正在加重著社會不公平。成為社會問題新的不穩(wěn)定因素。

4、經(jīng)濟危機：也指自然災(zāi)害，戰(zhàn)爭造成的生產(chǎn)力猛烈下降，經(jīng)濟極度混亂和動蕩的現(xiàn)象

5、科學(xué)發(fā)展觀，第一要務(wù)是發(fā)展，核心是以人為本，基本要求是全面協(xié)調(diào)可持續(xù)發(fā)展，根

本方法是統(tǒng)籌兼顧。

6、國外自然災(zāi)害：

2003年法國高達40度的熱浪，法國死了三萬多人，2005年南亞大海嘯，死傷更是慘重

7、過度的經(jīng)濟發(fā)展已經(jīng)造成了全球暖化、溫室效應(yīng)等，使得海平面上升，就是在上海，四十年后，也將成為水底的遺跡，而更別提二十年后的珠江三角洲面積將只剩下一半。2080年，全世界有10億到32億的人口需要面臨水災(zāi)，二到七億的人更將成為海龍王的祭品。熱帶雨林正以每秒三個足球場大的速度消失，如此全面且急迫的問題，難道不值得我們嚴正以待嗎？

8.如今經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的領(lǐng)軍產(chǎn)業(yè)是信息產(chǎn)業(yè)，請問對方辯友知不知道信息產(chǎn)業(yè)每年要耗費多少劇毒的化學(xué)物質(zhì)？信息產(chǎn)業(yè)僅在1999年，就用了世界上300萬噸劇毒物質(zhì)來提煉硅，制造芯片，對方辯友不要只看到無邊鈔票滾滾來，看不到一江毒水向東流??！

9.一是制約經(jīng)濟發(fā)展。世界銀行估算，1995年中國空氣和水污染造成的損失占當年GDP的8％；中科院專家測算，2003年環(huán)境污染和生態(tài)破壞造成的損失占GDP的15％；據(jù)2001年西部生態(tài)狀況調(diào)查報告，西部9省區(qū)生態(tài)破壞造成的直接經(jīng)濟損失占當?shù)谿DP的13％。

10.近年來，環(huán)保群體上訪和投訴不斷增加。2001年，全國環(huán)保系統(tǒng)共收到信件35．3萬封，2002年41萬封，2003年52．6萬封，以每年30％的速度上升；

11.據(jù)專家預(yù)測，十多年前，環(huán)境保護的投入只要達到GDP的1.5%，中國的環(huán)境就能夠有所改善，而中國的環(huán)保投入?yún)s一直在GDP的0.5%左右徘徊，如今環(huán)保投入已經(jīng)要求占到GDP的3%以上，而我國環(huán)保投入才達到總額1.5%。

12.目前1/3的國土被酸雨覆蓋，2/3的草原沙化，近乎100％的土壤板結(jié)；江河水系70％受到污染，40％嚴重污染，基本喪失使用功能，流經(jīng)城市的河流95％以上受到嚴重污染；中國水資源占有量不到世界平均水平的1/5，并且主要水系的2/5已成為劣五類水；全國有一半的人口缺乏干凈飲用水，3億多農(nóng)民喝不到干凈水，其中超過60％是由于非自然因素導(dǎo)致的飲用水源水質(zhì)不達標。三分天災(zāi)七分人禍，環(huán)境保護刻不容緩。

人類當代利益和后代利益的協(xié)調(diào)，地區(qū)局部利益和全球整體利益的協(xié)調(diào)。最后，實現(xiàn)人類利益和自然化境的真正協(xié)調(diào)。

生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的建設(shè)和保護是經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的前提和基礎(chǔ)

第五篇：英語作文：經(jīng)濟發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護

economic growth and environmental conservation Recently , many areas of china was battered by pretty heavy haze.besides self-mocking,it also makes more and more people realize the importance of keeping the balance between economic growth and environmental conservation.There did be contradictions between the two events.After all,we have to accept that sometimes we do sacrifice environment for the increase of GDP.If it goes on,the environment will break down sooner or later.Then,it will beat back.Global warming is the best proof.The polar bears lost their home,the sand storm continued blowing,the air pollution is increasing sever......In some degree,global warming the development of economic.Compared with developing or undeveloped countries,developed countries are more leisure in the face of environmental problems,After all,they have already went through the period of environmental degradation.Now, the mayor problems faced by the developed countries are high carbon dioxide emissions and abundant fund to deal with the pollution,However, it is everyone’s responsibility to protect the environment.Developed countries should make the best of their superiority to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and share their technology in environmental conservation with developing countries.Furthermore,they should provide funds to help developing countries adapt,particularly the least developed and most vulnerable countries to climate change.On the contrary,the situation of developing countries,especially undeveloped countries are worse.Many countries are struggling to solve the problem of food and clothing.they don’t have time to take environment problem into account.To make things worse,many pollution-belohing factories in developed countries have been shifted to the area of developing countries.They should pay more attention to industrial transformation and technological development.In addition,they could raise public awareness of environmental conservation.Developing countries should not blindly depend on developed countries.Global environment conservation needs global action now.The alarm bells ought to be ringing in every capital of the world.Global environmental degradation threathens our health,our economy,our natural resources,and our children’s future.It is clear we,everyone in the world must act.Just as mentioned above,we should raise out environmental protection awareness.Moreover,we could reject to use disposable goods,take public vehicles,save water and so on.By doing so,I believe the glob we love deeply will become better.