第一篇：環(huán)境優(yōu)于經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展辯論

Good afternoon everyone.We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, in our mind, it is environment growth that should be chosen.China is a developing country, economic development and environmental protection are often conflict.We agree economy growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local region environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great to our existence

We need to do the environment protecting first.My reasons are as followsFirstly, environment protection is the essential requirement of economic development.Economic development is to improve people's living standards, to solve the conflict of people's increasing material and cultural needs.Some measures on economic development especially in heavy industry have a negative impact on the lives of the residents and the situation in the countryside is more dangerous.They are contrary to the original intent of economic development.Secondly, environment protection is the strategy of sustainable development requirements.We live in the environment which our future generations will live in.Suppose that we destroy the environment and the damage is irreparable, this is a crime to the future generations.Now countries around the world have attached great importance to the strategy of sustainable development researchso do our country and to leave our future generations a better living space.Finally, environment protection is a natural requirements.If the damage is huge, we will be severely punished by the nature and cause inevitable consequence like some major floods.We spend more in relief than we earned from the development of economic.The laws of nature is merciless.We must pay more attention on protecting environment.

第二篇：英語(yǔ)辯論環(huán)境保護(hù)與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展

Which should receive priority in china? Environmental protection or economic growth.：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environmental protection or

economic growth should take priority in china;we think its economy growth should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.：First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed countries, so the urgent

affair of china is to develop our economy.：Second, Economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop

our economy without environmental pollution.：Third, when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on

environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in china.：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of

“first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.：What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much by this means, it placed us in a

completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.：So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past, which is to say, in the course of

development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty

good, but there are thousands people lack of money for the food or clothes.Even in the city like Dalian, how many people can’t afford of the expensive price of house.Do you think the problems like these can be solved by environmental protection?

：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of china have solved the problem of food

and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern china is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?

：Some eastern cities do exist whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that china has 130

million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole china.We know that environment protection need high-technology, high-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.：Environmental protection needs money.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.：Economic growth is important, environmental protection is also important.And our government has

already realized the importance of the balance between the two parts, and did achieve some

good results.I think in the future there will be on a win-win situation in the economic and

environmental protection.

第三篇：英語(yǔ)辯論——環(huán)境保護(hù)VS經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展

英語(yǔ)辯論——環(huán)境保護(hù)VS經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展(經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展正方）

Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正方一辯陳詞：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, we think it’s economy growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方一辯陳詞：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.That’s all I want to say.自由辯論

正方二辯：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty good, there are thousands people lack of money for the food the need to live.Then, opponent debaters, do you think we still need to develop our economies?

反方二辯：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of China have solved the problem of food and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern China is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?

正方三辯：There do exist some eastern cities whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that China has 130 million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole China.We know that environment protection need high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.反方三辯：Environmental protection needs economy.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.The policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the

environment.Doses it show that the environmental protection is more important?

正方四辯：Opponent debaters have referred the returning farmland to forest policy.We admit our country has paid a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit.But we should still take economic construction as the central task.反方四辯：We admit economic construction is our country’s principle task.But we have to insist on sustainable development while developing economy.We must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic development.總結(jié)：

正方總結(jié)：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth”.I think what they said can’t come true at present.It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy.反方總結(jié): Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy”.The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future.If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect, which lead to sea-level rises.As a result, thousands of coastal dweller has to face the fate of the migration.Moreover, the opponent also said,” when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want to question that when the animals and plants have died out, what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy.If the economic growth delays for two years, we can wait two years to develop it.But, if the environmental protection delays two years, the species will be extinct, the resources will exhaust.The urgency like this can’t wait.So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China.Thank you.補(bǔ)充及參考材料

二辯盤問 Two debate questioned 反方二辯：請(qǐng)問對(duì)方二辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)是一時(shí)之事，環(huán)境是萬代之事，哪個(gè)重要？經(jīng)濟(jì) 發(fā)展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環(huán)境沒了，還能生存嗎？?My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the?environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辯：不好意思對(duì)方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點(diǎn)是優(yōu)先權(quán)。并不是說經(jīng) 濟(jì)優(yōu)先就不搞環(huán)保了，只是環(huán)保處于較次的位置，跟中國(guó)現(xiàn)狀一樣，政策雖 然說要重視環(huán)保，但一般縣區(qū)還是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展優(yōu)先的，也就有資本的大城市才 比較重視搞環(huán)保，相信大家心知肚明?Sorry, I'm

afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy?development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the?environmental protection is just in the inferior position.Just like the present China,?although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely?take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.反方二辯：請(qǐng)問正方三辯，如果發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先的話，很可能造成環(huán)境成本大于經(jīng) 濟(jì)效益的情況，這樣的經(jīng)濟(jì)是發(fā)展還是倒退？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely?the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up? 正方三辯： 這種情況確實(shí)有存在，但并不是每時(shí)每刻都存在。各個(gè)行業(yè)情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經(jīng)濟(jì)效益是負(fù)的，那我們改 行環(huán)境保護(hù)優(yōu)先，就能轉(zhuǎn)虧為盈？我不這么覺得。to cause This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.正方二辯： 我們知道環(huán)境的保護(hù)是預(yù)防為主，防治結(jié)合，而預(yù)防和治理都要依 靠技術(shù)的發(fā)展，那請(qǐng)問對(duì)方二辯，如果沒有強(qiáng)有力的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)支持科學(xué)技術(shù) 發(fā)展，那么以科技為支撐的環(huán)保從何談起呢？?We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.反方二辯：你的問題未免抽象了點(diǎn)?？萍及l(fā)展無止盡，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展也沒盡頭，什么 時(shí)候算得上是“強(qiáng)有力”呢？但是環(huán)境保護(hù)是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is?imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方二辯：請(qǐng)問反方三辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內(nèi)容，包括衣食 住行娛樂，這難道不是現(xiàn)在社會(huì)上人們的普遍愿望嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the?people's universal desire? 反方三辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個(gè)既 能享受到生活樂趣，同時(shí)又是一個(gè)健康和諧自然的環(huán)境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment?自由辯論 正方一辯： 請(qǐng)問對(duì)方辯友，原始社會(huì)的人類祖先們環(huán)境保護(hù)工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們 經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的 意思我們應(yīng)該回歸這種生活嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning??反方一辯：人類祖先確實(shí)需要發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，但若是在這個(gè)過程中砍完了森林，污染 了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發(fā)展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是 經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的泄漏帶來了環(huán)境的極度惡化，請(qǐng)問 你怎么看？?Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer.What I want to ask is, nuclear power station is the

outcome of the economic development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it??正方二辯：首先，我方并沒有承諾經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展就一定會(huì)破壞到環(huán)境；其次，對(duì)方所 說的情況只是鳳毛麟角；第三，核電站泄漏是科技不力，而經(jīng)濟(jì)是科學(xué)研究 的基礎(chǔ)。First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment;second, the situation you said is only rare;third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not strong.But economy is the foundation?of scientific research.反方二辯：但是核電站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么辦？沒有了這 些，我們的生活怎么辦？你愿意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之 間？?But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries??正方三辯：但是對(duì)方辯友請(qǐng)注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活 用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機(jī)器可以運(yùn)作，生產(chǎn)可以興起，環(huán)境總會(huì)有 辦法彌補(bǔ)，我也想問，你愿意生活在兩小時(shí)停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之 處？ Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of people's living power.With the electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the?environment.I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.反方三辯：你的意思是破壞了環(huán)境然后再去彌補(bǔ)。為什么要先污染后治理？為什 么要兜這么大一個(gè)圈子呢？而且我國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)里程已經(jīng)證明，先污染后治 理是錯(cuò)的，行不通的。You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it.Why management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.正方四辯：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站泄漏了，嚴(yán)重污染 了環(huán)境，而我方堅(jiān)信是可以挽救的。而且事實(shí)上，包括核電站在內(nèi)的很多工 業(yè)廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們?cè)诟憬?jīng)濟(jì)的同時(shí)，并沒有放棄環(huán)境的保護(hù)。I can not but say that we are really undeserved.It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved.And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.反方四辯：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無法保證無污染，這樣日積 月累下來，依然會(huì)是一片慘狀。必須把環(huán)境保護(hù)放在第一位，每個(gè)工廠都嚴(yán) 抓，才能從根本上阻止環(huán)境的惡化。But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution.As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation.So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening fundamentally.正方三辯：對(duì)方辯友請(qǐng)從事實(shí)出發(fā)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展必然會(huì)付出代價(jià)，我們已經(jīng)在努力 使代價(jià)降到最低。Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.反方三辯：降低應(yīng)該有個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)吧，這不是你我能定的，是自然環(huán)境定的，等到他 揭示這個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時(shí)，只怕為時(shí)已晚了。Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.

第四篇：英語(yǔ)辯論——環(huán)境保護(hù)VS經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展

英語(yǔ)辯論——環(huán)境保護(hù)VS經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展(經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展正方）

Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正方一辯陳詞： we think it’s economy growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方一辯陳詞：We agree economic growth is needed.But the environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.That’s all I want to say.反方二辯：請(qǐng)問對(duì)方二辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)是一時(shí)之事，環(huán)境是萬代之事，哪個(gè)重要？經(jīng)濟(jì) 發(fā)展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環(huán)境沒了，還能生存嗎？?My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the?environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辯：不好意思對(duì)方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點(diǎn)是優(yōu)先權(quán)。并不是說經(jīng) 濟(jì)優(yōu)先就不搞環(huán)保了，只是環(huán)保處于較次的位置，Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy?development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the?environmental protection is just in the inferior position.、反方三辯：請(qǐng)問正方三辯，如果發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先的話，很可能造成環(huán)境成本大于經(jīng) 濟(jì)效益的情況，這樣的經(jīng)濟(jì)是發(fā)展還是倒退？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely?the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?

正方三辯： 這種情況確實(shí)有存在，但并不是每時(shí)每刻都存在。各個(gè)行業(yè)情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經(jīng)濟(jì)效益是負(fù)的，那我們改 行環(huán)境保護(hù)優(yōu)先，就能轉(zhuǎn)虧為盈？我不這么覺得。This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.反方四辯：你的問題未免抽象了點(diǎn)。科技發(fā)展無止盡，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展也沒盡頭，但是環(huán)境保護(hù)是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, But environmental protection is?imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方四辯：請(qǐng)問反方四辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內(nèi)容，包括衣食 住行娛樂，這難道不是現(xiàn)在社會(huì)上人們的普遍愿望嗎？Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the?people's universal desire?

反方一辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個(gè)既 能享受到生活樂趣，同時(shí)又是一個(gè)健康和諧自然的環(huán)境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment

正方一辯： 請(qǐng)問對(duì)方辯友，原始社會(huì)的人類祖先們環(huán)境保護(hù)工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們 經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的 意思我們應(yīng)該回歸這種生活嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

正方總結(jié)：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth”.I think what they said can’t come true at present.It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy.反方總結(jié): Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy”.The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future.If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life ？

第五篇：改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境

改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境

改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境

為了認(rèn)真貫徹落實(shí)市委一屆十一次全會(huì)精神，為實(shí)現(xiàn)“規(guī)模推進(jìn)年”的各項(xiàng)任務(wù)目標(biāo)創(chuàng)造良好的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境，由市人大常委會(huì)副主任帶隊(duì)，協(xié)調(diào)組織人大內(nèi)司委、市經(jīng)貿(mào)委等有關(guān)部門，組成專題調(diào)研組，走訪市直有關(guān)部門，深入縣區(qū)，對(duì)我市經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)的政策、法制、服務(wù)等環(huán)境建設(shè)進(jìn)行了認(rèn)真的調(diào)查研究?，F(xiàn)將調(diào)研情況報(bào)告如下：

一、我市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境的現(xiàn)狀

年初以來，我市的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境，經(jīng)過市、縣兩級(jí)黨委和政府的共同努力，全市上下方方面面的積極推進(jìn)和整治，呈現(xiàn)出越來越好的發(fā)展態(tài)勢(shì)。各項(xiàng)優(yōu)惠政策逐步得到了落實(shí)，“三亂”問題得到了

有效遏制，工作效率有所提高，服務(wù)質(zhì)量進(jìn)一步優(yōu)化，行政執(zhí)法逐步規(guī)范，監(jiān)督力度不斷加大，有力地促進(jìn)了市域經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)事業(yè)的健康發(fā)展。

1、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)重視層次高，推進(jìn)力度大。市委市政府高度重視我市的經(jīng)濟(jì)南市展環(huán)境工作。年初發(fā)綏發(fā)[]3號(hào)文件下發(fā)了《全市整冶經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境工作方案》，明確了工作總體思路，重點(diǎn)任務(wù)，時(shí)間步驟，保證措施和要達(dá)到的目標(biāo)。二月份，市委市政府又召開電視電話會(huì)議，對(duì)全市集中整冶經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境工作進(jìn)行了專題部署。此外市人大、政協(xié)召開的“兩會(huì)”上、市紀(jì)委四次全會(huì)和市本級(jí)規(guī)模推進(jìn)工作會(huì)議等大型會(huì)議上，市級(jí)幾大班子都對(duì)改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境工作做出了部署，提出了明確要求。各縣區(qū)都成立了由書記為組長(zhǎng)，主管經(jīng)濟(jì)工作的副書記為副組長(zhǎng)，相關(guān)部門為成員單位的改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境專題領(lǐng)導(dǎo)小組，下設(shè)專項(xiàng)推進(jìn)辦公室。層層落實(shí)了目標(biāo)責(zé)任，制定了具體的工作措施，建立健全了各項(xiàng)

規(guī)章制度。形成了領(lǐng)導(dǎo)小組統(tǒng)一協(xié)調(diào)、牽頭部門和責(zé)任部門齊抓共管的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)機(jī)制和組織體系，為改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境提供了強(qiáng)有力的組織保障。

2、宣傳教育工作抓得實(shí)，輿論氛圍濃。一是全市廣泛利用各種新聞媒體開展了改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境的宣傳教育活動(dòng)，極大地調(diào)動(dòng)了廣大干部群眾參與改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境的積極性和主動(dòng)性，初步形成了領(lǐng)導(dǎo)重視、群眾關(guān)心、全社會(huì)參與的改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境的濃厚社會(huì)輿論氛圍；二是加強(qiáng)了對(duì)各級(jí)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部和工作人員的法律、法規(guī)和政策教育，提高了領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者和行政執(zhí)法人員的政策水平和法律意識(shí)；三是強(qiáng)化了對(duì)公務(wù)員、企業(yè)廠長(zhǎng)wto知識(shí)的培訓(xùn)，提高了他們的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)意識(shí)和駕馭市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的能力；四是加強(qiáng)了對(duì)青少年法制教育，從基礎(chǔ)、源頭上預(yù)防了犯罪，減少了社會(huì)不穩(wěn)定因素。

3、法制環(huán)境得到有效治理，取得了階段性成果。紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察機(jī)關(guān)加大了對(duì)影響經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的違法違紀(jì)案件的查處力度。

上半年，全市共查處破壞經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境案件64件，處分89人。法院加大了執(zhí)法和審判工作力度，對(duì)涉及經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪的案件做到了從快從速處理。全市法院系統(tǒng)共受理各類案件29,256件，審結(jié)28,508件，結(jié)案標(biāo)的額達(dá)億元。兩年來全市法院為企業(yè)減緩免訴訟費(fèi)20多萬元，減負(fù)3億元。檢察院加大了對(duì)各類犯罪的查處力度，加強(qiáng)了對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)案件的訴訟監(jiān)督，主動(dòng)為企業(yè)提供法律服務(wù)。，共辦理國(guó)有資產(chǎn)流失案件6件，提起抗拆100多件，查辦經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪120件，挽回經(jīng)濟(jì)損失100多萬元。公安部門加大了“掃黑除惡”和對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)案件的偵破力度，有效地震懾了犯罪，規(guī)范了行政執(zhí)法人員行為，維護(hù)了政治穩(wěn)定和社會(huì)安定。工商、稅務(wù)、環(huán)保、交通、城建等其它行政執(zhí)法部門也都從本部門職能出發(fā)，制定了多項(xiàng)改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境的措施，受到群眾好評(píng)。

4、服務(wù)環(huán)境有了較大改善，服務(wù)質(zhì)量逐步提高。全市各行政執(zhí)法、綜合管理、社會(huì)服務(wù)部門不斷加強(qiáng)隊(duì)伍建設(shè)，深入開展雙評(píng)活動(dòng)，積極推行政務(wù)公開和承諾制，著力提高服務(wù)效率和服務(wù)水平，樹立了良好的部門形象和行業(yè)形象。各地進(jìn)一步加大了行政審批改革力度，規(guī)范了審批行為，減少了審批環(huán)節(jié)，普遍實(shí)行了“一站式”辦公。各縣區(qū)還強(qiáng)化了對(duì)服務(wù)中心的投資建設(shè)，大大提高了工作效率。慶安縣實(shí)行了行政機(jī)關(guān)審批事項(xiàng)首問負(fù)責(zé)制和限時(shí)辦結(jié)制。全市在各行業(yè)開展了治亂減負(fù)工作，對(duì)企業(yè)加大了扶持力度，對(duì)域外企業(yè)實(shí)行零干擾、免打擾。，市本級(jí)僅為三精藥業(yè)、銀娃乳業(yè)、客運(yùn)樞紐工程減免基礎(chǔ)建設(shè)配套費(fèi)400萬元，減免排污費(fèi)38萬元。各地還深入開展了對(duì)行政執(zhí)法的評(píng)議監(jiān)督工作。慶安縣的季度評(píng)議，肇東市的全行業(yè)評(píng)議，都是成功的范例。通過評(píng)議，對(duì)執(zhí)法部門形成了有效的監(jiān)督約束機(jī)制，促進(jìn)了服務(wù)質(zhì)量和服務(wù)水平的提高。

5、政策環(huán)境進(jìn)一步放寬，對(duì)招商引資工作起到了助推作用。全市結(jié)合實(shí)際制

定有利于企業(yè)和外商生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)的優(yōu)惠政策文件148份1340多條；共清理文件3000余份，廢止制約經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的政策性文件60多份。肇東市制定了《改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境六項(xiàng)制度》、《肇東市創(chuàng)建優(yōu)良發(fā)展環(huán)境“十條禁令”》等多方面的政策措施，在改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境上邁出了較大步伐。慶安縣先后出臺(tái)了《慶安縣招商引資優(yōu)惠政策》、《慶安縣鼓勵(lì)房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)優(yōu)惠政策》等，極大地增強(qiáng)了招商引資的吸引力，促進(jìn)了地方經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展。我市對(duì)招商引資政策進(jìn)一步放寬，特別是對(duì)進(jìn)入開發(fā)區(qū)的企業(yè)，在辦理手續(xù)、土地使用、稅費(fèi)收繳等方面給予了極大的優(yōu)惠。一系列政策的出臺(tái)和落實(shí)，推動(dòng)了招商引資工作的深入開展。上半年，全市共引進(jìn)項(xiàng)目226個(gè)，到位資金億元，同比增長(zhǎng)％。寬松的投資環(huán)境，為實(shí)現(xiàn)規(guī)模推進(jìn)目標(biāo)，加快經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展提供了強(qiáng)有力的政策支持和動(dòng)力支持。

二、改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境存在的問題及成因

我市的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境雖然有了較大改善，但與發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)相比，與我市加快發(fā)展的要求相比，尚有一定的差距，還存在一些亟待解決的問題。

一是服務(wù)意識(shí)不強(qiáng)，執(zhí)法工作的整體水平和執(zhí)法人員的整體素質(zhì)有待于進(jìn)一步提高。有些地方存在說功好、做功差，喊的多、干的少，上熱下冷現(xiàn)象。有些行政職能部門輕管理、輕服務(wù)，存有較嚴(yán)重的以罰代管，只罰不幫的現(xiàn)象，錯(cuò)誤地認(rèn)為管理就是處罰，服務(wù)就是收費(fèi)，導(dǎo)致管理職能弱化和執(zhí)法目的扭曲。有的行政執(zhí)法行為不規(guī)范，文明執(zhí)法意識(shí)不強(qiáng)。有些執(zhí)法人員在執(zhí)法過程中，言行粗魯，態(tài)度冷、橫、硬、沖，勒拿卡要報(bào)等不正之風(fēng)較為嚴(yán)重，該辦的事頂著不辦，可辦可不辦的事拖著不辦，可這么辦可那么辦的事卡著不辦。有的部門隊(duì)伍建設(shè)抓得不力，對(duì)職工干部疏于教育、疏于管理、疏于監(jiān)督，導(dǎo)致一些工作人員素質(zhì)差，不懂政策，不熟業(yè)務(wù)，甚至違法違紀(jì)。

二是行政管理體制不理順，給部門執(zhí)法帶來了一定難度，同時(shí)也導(dǎo)致“三亂”加劇，加重了企業(yè)負(fù)擔(dān)。如審計(jì)部門，由于雙重管理體制的束縛，對(duì)地方政府和行政執(zhí)法等部門的審計(jì)監(jiān)督受到了很大限制，難以充分發(fā)揮職能作用。還有一些部門在執(zhí)法過程中，也遇到了同樣問題。我們現(xiàn)行的管理體制，存在差額撥款和自收自支事業(yè)單位，自收自支人員比例過高。據(jù)調(diào)查，市直機(jī)關(guān)事業(yè)單位，全額撥款的3763人，自收自支的3097人，差額撥款的2730人。這些自收自支和差額撥款的事業(yè)單位為了保開支，想方設(shè)法加重收費(fèi)。還有的個(gè)別單位自行制定收費(fèi)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，確定收費(fèi)項(xiàng)目，使“三亂”現(xiàn)象久禁不止，企業(yè)負(fù)擔(dān)減而不輕。

三是政府職能轉(zhuǎn)變不到位，個(gè)別地方參與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)，背離了市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)律。政府在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下，一般規(guī)則應(yīng)當(dāng)是政府調(diào)控市場(chǎng)，市場(chǎng)引導(dǎo)企業(yè)。便我們有些政府部門還不適應(yīng)駕馭市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)律的工作方法，不能為企業(yè)搭臺(tái)唱戲，造成

市場(chǎng)的無序競(jìng)爭(zhēng)和不平等競(jìng)爭(zhēng)，違背了市場(chǎng)規(guī)律。

四是對(duì)行政執(zhí)法的監(jiān)督力度不夠。人大的法律監(jiān)督、政協(xié)和人民群眾的民主監(jiān)督、紀(jì)檢部門的紀(jì)律監(jiān)督和新聞單位的輿論監(jiān)督，這些層級(jí)監(jiān)督都發(fā)揮了很大作用，但還須進(jìn)一步加大力度。目前，這些監(jiān)督還沒有真正形成制度化，缺乏統(tǒng)一的協(xié)調(diào)推進(jìn)機(jī)制。行政執(zhí)法責(zé)任追究制度落實(shí)不到位，對(duì)一些違法違紀(jì)問題懲處的力度不夠，往往是大事化小、小事化了，致使一些違法違紀(jì)的人和事得不到及時(shí)有效查處。

五是基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施及公共環(huán)境建設(shè)投入不足，硬環(huán)境建設(shè)滯后。據(jù)調(diào)查，市本級(jí)用于基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)費(fèi)用3000萬元，占市本級(jí)全口徑財(cái)政總收入億元的15%。全市人均擁有城市維護(hù)建設(shè)資金204元，在全省排第8位，處于下游。南方一些發(fā)達(dá)城市的開發(fā)區(qū)已經(jīng)實(shí)現(xiàn)了“九通一平”，可我們現(xiàn)在只達(dá)到“六通一平”，個(gè)別縣“三通一平”也沒有達(dá)到，而且標(biāo)準(zhǔn)

較低。全市現(xiàn)有城市綠地面積僅公頃，占建成區(qū)面積的%。學(xué)校、醫(yī)院、公園、商店、賓館、飯店等公共環(huán)境建設(shè)與發(fā)達(dá)城市比，明顯落后。公共秩序和公共衛(wèi)生狀況有待于進(jìn)一步改善。

通過調(diào)查分析，我市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境存在問題的主要原因：一是思想觀念滯后。由于在一部分行政管理和執(zhí)法部門中存在較嚴(yán)重的全局與局部利益錯(cuò)位、管理與服務(wù)職能錯(cuò)位，特別是某些領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部對(duì)改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境思想上存在誤區(qū)，沒有樹立環(huán)境就是生產(chǎn)力和“人人是環(huán)境，事事是環(huán)境”的觀念，不能站在全市經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展的高度抓環(huán)境建設(shè)，因而導(dǎo)致政府某些部門服務(wù)意識(shí)淡薄，服務(wù)職能弱化，服務(wù)質(zhì)量和水平也存在較大差距。二是部門利益至上。有些有行政執(zhí)法執(zhí)罰權(quán)的職能部門，為了本部門利益，為了小集團(tuán)或個(gè)人利益，在行政執(zhí)法中，違規(guī)執(zhí)法、越權(quán)執(zhí)法、有令不行、有禁不止、亂收亂罰，給企業(yè)增加了沉重的負(fù)擔(dān)。三是行政審批制度改革不到

位。在一些部門和單位，行政審批事項(xiàng)該下放的沒有下放，該精簡(jiǎn)的沒有精簡(jiǎn)，對(duì)保留的審批項(xiàng)目缺乏嚴(yán)格規(guī)范，審批環(huán)節(jié)過多，審批程序過于繁雜。一些過時(shí)的政策，沒有及時(shí)清理、修訂，個(gè)別地方還存在用已經(jīng)明令廢止的政策文件收費(fèi)的現(xiàn)象。四是社會(huì)監(jiān)督機(jī)制不健全。目前，還沒有真正形成政府部門為納稅人服務(wù)，納稅人有權(quán)力監(jiān)督政府工作的良好社會(huì)環(huán)境。

三、對(duì)策建議

針對(duì)我市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境存在的問題，我們應(yīng)立足市情，狠抓當(dāng)前，著眼長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)，擺正局部和整體、管理和服務(wù)、監(jiān)督和扶持的關(guān)系，進(jìn)一步強(qiáng)化環(huán)境意識(shí)，樹立環(huán)境就是生產(chǎn)力的理念。重點(diǎn)應(yīng)抓好以下工作：

1、抓領(lǐng)導(dǎo)，確保政令暢通。實(shí)踐證明，一個(gè)地方的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境如何，關(guān)鍵在領(lǐng)導(dǎo)。因此，各級(jí)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)要把改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境工作擺上更加突出的位置，精心研究部署，層層落實(shí)責(zé)任，加強(qiáng)督辦檢

查，狠抓工作落實(shí)。特別是經(jīng)濟(jì)管理部門、行政執(zhí)法部門和條條部門的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)，要進(jìn)一步深化對(duì)改善經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)境重要性的認(rèn)識(shí)，從放寬經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展環(huán)1 2 下一頁(yè)