第一篇：英語辯論賽用稿 開車好還是不好

A:With the development of social and living standards, more and more cars are widely used in the family.Despite the popularity of cars take a great convenience to people , but the other hand, it also caused great distress.Such as the status of the Beijing traffic jam.We found that traffic jams have become obstacles to social development now.Accroding to these,I have 3 points as follows.1,First, a large number of cars in use caused a lot of traffic accidents, personal injury and property damage,and this is the most important what I want to say.2,Certainly, accidents do not happen every day.But reduce our opportunities of training to go everywhere by car, and it is also bad for our health.3, Similarly, car tail gas makes air pollution and global warming.All in all,we can conclude that cars lead to traffic jams.This not only led to the loss of others, also led to the loss of our own.B:As you said, contemporary society is progressing, and the car's development is a sign of social progress.In my point of view, , people's lives of modern society are no longer fixed at a certain place, often requires long-distance migration, while cars can greatly reduce time on the road.Time is money, efficiency is life, the birth of the car can be a feat of human, and application of this feat, let us live better,.Then I have 4 points as follows;1 we can go convenience, anytime, anywhere.Improve efficiency, one month before the time to reach the destination, and now for a few days to complete.2 It can Reduce the distance of the world, driving the growth of national economy.And it also promote the invention of new technologies

So to sum up, we firmly believe that cars leads to convenience.A: Ok, I will not deny that cars make people's lives more convenient.I really want to crusade against driving private cars such this behavior.Bus, subway, taxis which constitute the public transport system has been able to fully meet our daily travel needs.B: I’m inclined to disagree with that.Cars not only provides convenient transportation,but also provide a comfortable environment.This is the subway and buses can not be compared.A: I’m afraid I don’t agree with you.A large number of private cars, public cars there, in addition to make road more block, and make the air even worse, the environment becomes more noisy, how can it have a comfortable environment?

B: In fact, more and more people concerned about the problem of automobile exhaust, so contemporary society has successfully developed zero pollution emissions from cars.In a convenient means of transport and a comfortable environment, r why do not we have it? A:That’s a good point.with the development of economic, and more and more people willing buy the car.Unfortunately, the majority of our houses are not having underground parking facilities.Although some houses have underground parking, a garage you may be able to buy two cars, so you can park your car in places like the next floor.This has indirectly caused another traffic jam B:A big city has perfect city planning and urban design practices,such as singapore.The total area of nearly 700 square kilometers but loaded with 4.5 million population, it also makes a good urban planning a lot better than the current situation in Beijing.

第二篇：英語辯論賽用稿 開車好還是不好

A:With the development of social and living standards, more and more cars are widely used in the family.Despite the popularity of cars take a great convenience to people , but the other hand, it also caused great distress.Such as the status of the Beijing traffic jam.We found that traffic jams have become obstacles to social development now.Accroding to these,I have 3 points as follows.1,First, a large number of cars in use caused a lot of traffic accidents, personal injury and property damage,and this is the most important what I want to say.2,Certainly, accidents do not happen every day.But reduce our opportunities of trainingto go everywhere by car, and it is also bad for our health.3, Similarly, car tail gas makes air pollution and global warming.All in all,we can conclude that cars lead to traffic jams.This not only led to the loss of others, also led to the loss of our own.B:As you said, contemporary society is progressing, and the car's development is a sign of social progress.In my point of view, , people's lives of modern society are no longer fixed at a certain place, often requires long-distance migration, while cars cangreatly reduce time on the road.Time is money, efficiency is life,the birth of the car can be a feat of human, and application of this feat, let us live better,.Then I have 4 points as follows;we can go convenience, anytime, anywhere.Improve efficiency, one month before the time to reach the destination, and now for a few days to complete.It can Reduce the distance of the world, driving the growth of national economy.And it also promote the invention of new technologies

So to sum up, we firmly believe that cars leads to convenience.A: Ok, I will not deny that cars make people's lives more convenient.I reallywant to crusade against driving private cars such this behavior.Bus, subway, taxis which constitute the public transport system has been able to fully meet our daily travel needs.B: I’m inclined to disagree with that.Cars not only provides convenient transportation,but also provide a comfortable environment.This is the subway and buses can not be compared.A: I’m afraid I don’t agree with you.A large number of private cars, public cars there, in addition to make road more block, and make the air even worse, the environment becomes more noisy, how can it have a comfortable environment?

B: In fact, more and more people concerned about the problem of automobile exhaust, so contemporary society has successfully

developed zero pollution emissions from cars.In a convenient means of transport and a comfortable environment, r why do not we have it?

A:That’s a good point.with the development ofeconomic, and more and more people willingbuy the car.Unfortunately, the majority of our houses are nothaving underground parking facilities.Although some houses have underground parking, a garage you may be able to buy two cars, so you can park your car in places like the next floor.This has indirectly caused anothertraffic jam

B:A big city has perfect city planning and urban design practices,such as singapore.The total area of nearly 700 square kilometers but loaded with 4.5 million population, it also makes a good urban planning a lot better than the current situation in Beijing.

第三篇：辯論賽先考研好還是先就業(yè)好

先工作才能先積累經(jīng)驗！先工作才能先磨練心志！先工作才能先培養(yǎng)能力！各位先工作才能先搶占先機所以大學本科畢業(yè)先工作好！

各位觀眾各位評委大家好，經(jīng)過剛剛激烈的辯駁，結合我方觀點，我方認為對方辯友有以下幾個漏洞

第一是經(jīng)濟成本。畢業(yè)考研如果考得上，三年的學費和生活費也不是小數(shù)字。如果一次考不上，還要考第2次、第3次，成本更加驚人。我們已經(jīng)是成年人，應該做的是為父母分擔壓力，排除他們生活上的困難，而不是再為他們增加經(jīng)濟上的負擔。那么退一步講，.就業(yè)之后也不意味著沒有機會讀研，如果真的想進一步深造的話，參加工作之后能更深刻的認識到市場的需求，學習更有目標性，對于家庭困難的人還能奠定經(jīng)濟基礎，一邊賺錢，一邊讀書，何樂而不為呢？

第二是能力成本。要想有好的工作我們首先要適應社會需求，現(xiàn)在大多數(shù)企業(yè)，他們都重視實際能力、實踐經(jīng)驗和可塑性，你只有進入社會，你才知道你到底需要什么，你才有動力去做每一件事?，F(xiàn)在學校學習的都是一些理論知識，與實踐相差很遠，只有真正去接觸實踐才能找到方向，知道在哪方面還有能力的欠缺，從而出現(xiàn)在學校時的那種迷茫感。因此一個新踏上社會的研究生并不一定比有著三年工作經(jīng)驗的本科生有太多優(yōu)勢。

第三是機會成本，這是很重要的一點?？佳械臏蕚淦陂g已經(jīng)錯過了就業(yè)的最佳時機，很多考研失敗的人開始找工作，時常會被用人單位拒絕，原因都只有一個，企業(yè)認為考研沒成功的人在進入單位的第一年試用期中，離開的比例大得多。這時考研反而成了求職的絆腳石我想這些并不是大家所喜聞樂見的吧？此外國家也一直在鼓勵大學生走出校園進行創(chuàng)業(yè)，難道這種機會還不值得我們?nèi)幦幔?/p>

第四是社會成本，本科的知識已經(jīng)能夠滿足我們在工作初期的需求，過高的學歷并不能給我們帶來明顯的優(yōu)勢，正如前幾年一個北大學生賣豬肉，對方辯友認為他的專業(yè)知識會給他帶來什么優(yōu)勢呢？對方辯友不會是想告訴我他考的是殺豬系研究生吧？

第五是時間成本，時間就是金錢，這句話大家都已經(jīng)耳熟能詳了吧？在現(xiàn)在這個社會，年輕就是資本，企業(yè)和事業(yè)單位都在大膽啟用新人，我們的領導階層也在逐漸年輕化，我們不應該在還年輕的時候盡早起步，抓住先機嗎？如果一味的追求高學歷那為什么不在碩士之后接著考博士，考完博士再考斗士，最后爽快點，咱們直接考個烈士回家不就萬事無憂了嗎？

綜上所述，我認為我們應該大學畢業(yè)之后先就業(yè)，等看清形勢之后再做進一步的打算

最大的問題就是自己不明白自己到底是想要什么，一味的隨社會上的考研熱，而不結合自己的實際情況，這本身就是缺乏自信，缺乏主觀意識，缺乏能力的表現(xiàn)。

考上研究生，去打工。那請問對方辯友你辛辛苦苦考上研究生是為了什么？難道就是去打工浪費你寶貴的時間？

第四篇：辯論賽正方用稿

辯論：小學生看電視的利與弊

正方：

主持人（主席）、對方辯友、各位同學:

大家好!我方觀點認為小學生要多看電視。我認為小學生可以多看電視。因為電視可以教我們一些知識，有一些是教育方面的電視，所以我認為可以多看電視。以下是我方的觀點:

1、看電視可以增長我們的知識。就拿CCTV-8的節(jié)目來說吧，每天都插放“探索、發(fā)現(xiàn)”，這就是一個有知識性的節(jié)目。而且我們還可以看一些新聞，比如新聞60分、生活在線等等。從中，我們可以了解一些發(fā)生在我們身邊的事。

2、可以提高我們的想象力。在生活中處處都要有想象力，如果一個人沒有想象力，那他就會很“傻”，而想象力除了看書看電視也可以培養(yǎng)孩子的想象力!首先，小孩子有玩的天性，你不可能讓他自己一人違背自己的想法來滿足你吧。何況現(xiàn)在從中央到地方都開通了少兒頻道，讓他多看看是有益無害的。

教育學家認為，電視對發(fā)展孩子的感知能力，提高記憶效果是有益的。電視的特色即動作和聲音同時刺激感官能吸引兒童的注意力。同時，還因為動作本身容易感知、記憶、可以提高孩子的興趣。如電視的動感特色可以使一顆小種子逐漸長成了參天大樹，給孩子強烈的印象，看到了變化的全過程，從而深深地銘記在記憶中。有人說:“一張畫勝過千言萬語?！倍环哂袆痈刑厣碾娨暜嬅妫瑢φZ言發(fā)展尚不完善的幼兒來說，其意義和價值就不言而喻了。另外電視對提高孩子的思維能力，激發(fā)其想象力能起到積極作用。

3、可以了解一些國家大事。報告稱，如果每天看兩個小時的電視，那么他們在閱讀、算術和詞匯上的得分比不看電視的孩子高出10%，因為看電視可以讓小孩子增長見聞，學習各種良好的社交和學習技巧，從而為他們今后的學習打下良好的基礎。（這項研究報告是由美國得克薩斯大學的兒童發(fā)展教授阿萊莎·休斯頓撰寫的）

綜上所述，我方堅決認為小學生要多看電視。

正方：我方認為小學生看電視好處多。它可以開闊我們的視野，增長我們的知識。比如我，就喜歡看一些科學探秘方面的節(jié)目，懂得了許多書本上所沒有的知識。

正方：這并不能否認看電視的好處。只要我們有選擇的看，或者在家長的陪同下，就可以避免這些危害。

正方：看電視引起近視，這是由于長時間近距離看電視造成的，只要我們保持好距離，有節(jié)制地看，不僅能增長知識，還能消除一天學習帶來的疲勞呢！

正方：同學們，電視在各家各戶中都已是常見的家電，而看電視，有的同學說好，有的同學說壞，但我覺得看電視是好的。電視中的許多東西都是我們必須學習的，如新聞或是地方事情，天氣預報；這些都給我們的生活提供了很大的方便，看電視又能擴大知識面，使我們對世界萬物都有新的認識，所以，看電視是好的，也是對我們有益的。

正方：我覺得看電視不會近視，那些近視者許多都是因為太認真讀書造成的，而因看電視造成近視者是極少數(shù)。你看，我喜歡看電視就沒有近視。因此，只要控制好距離，選擇好適當?shù)墓?jié)目，看電視是有益的。

正方：我覺得看電視是好的。因為它不僅能幫助我們學習，開拓視野，而且又給我們提供了許多方便。如果現(xiàn)在美國發(fā)生了什么事，難道我們要親自到美國去了解情況嗎？再例如，在“非典”時期，我們只能通過電視來了解“非典”患者的情況。

正方：看電視，我們可看到它的畫面，這樣我們才能更加深層地去了解他們的情況。反方說也可以通過報紙來了解，而今天所發(fā)生的事情，我們要等到第二天才能知道，但電視不同，它可以在第一時間播放出來。再說了，報紙的字太小了，我們要拿很近才能看清楚，這對我們的眼睛也是有傷害的。

正方：收音機只能聽其聲音，無法看到圖象，而電腦，又要上網(wǎng)才可以。何況現(xiàn)在的許多兒童，上網(wǎng)只有一個目的，那就是打游戲。

正方：我覺得反方的說法是錯的。因為我們可以從電視中學到許多的知識，有關于英語的，關于數(shù)學的，關于語文的，關于科學的??應有盡有，無所不有。我們可以通過它們來做預習工作，增長見識，成績不但不會下降，而且還會提高。

正方：我們的意思是說我們可以利用電視來提前預習。

正方：電視上的內(nèi)容比較多，比較豐富，而課本上的內(nèi)容有限制，但電視說得比較快，我們可以利用課本更加仔細地學會知識。

正方：如果我們沒有從電視上學會知識，我們能知道怎么玩嗎？

正方：這就要求我們學會自控，不然我們分那些品德書、政治書干什么。就是要在另一方面把扭曲的思想拉直。如果我們像書呆子一樣，整天都在讀書，沒有休息，學習的范圍只限制在課本上的話，那么就是死讀書，難道我們要學習古代書生那樣子：兩耳不聞天下事，一心只讀圣賢書嗎？還有一點，看電視可以開拓我們的視野。

正方：兩樣都看。因為《粉紅女郎》比《新聞聯(lián)播》更早播放。而且《粉紅女郎》只是搞笑而已，陶冶情操，而且一個健康的人還需要有幽默感。這樣，我們既陶冶了情操又了解了國家大事。這樣，豈不是兩全齊美嗎！

正方：我覺得看電視就象：“閱讀不局限于書本”一樣，可以更快地了解國家和世界的事情，看電視比讀書、看報更通人情事故，更易使人理解接受，而且可吸取他人的經(jīng)驗教訓，不再犯同樣的錯誤，創(chuàng)造自己更好的將來。

正方：既然那么說，可見他是個不懂看電視者，我教一下對方，你該多看些中央臺第10套的節(jié)目，即使你整天都看，也保準你不會誤入歧途，它還會帶你去觀賞大自然，陶冶道德情操，使你的品格更加高尚，里面教育方面的信息也特多，有益我們的學習。

正方：如果看電視有害的話，為何國家要花那么多錢編越來越多的節(jié)目？為何老師允許我們看晚上十八點的電視節(jié)目和十九點的新聞呢？我佩服對方能去找到如此多的材料，而我卻不敢茍同對方的觀點?？措娨暿莾和瘜W習生活的調(diào)味劑，不然，一味地學習實在太枯燥了。電視除了讓你了解國內(nèi)外的大事外，還可以讓你靜靜地聆聽現(xiàn)實生活的喧沸，從電視上了解了更多事情

正方：那是否我們該把電視給消滅了。

正方：我主張小學生要多看電視。電視是認識世界的窗口，小學生多看電視，可以及時了解國內(nèi)外的大事，開闊視野，增長知識。再說，我們在學校學習很緊張，回家后，放松一下是非常必要的。而看電視就是一種很好的放松。

正方：我請反方同學注意，當今電視是傳遞信息、傳播知識的重要渠道，難道我們多看電視，多掌握一些信息和知識不好嗎？我在電視里看了《鴉片戰(zhàn)爭》，了解了鴉片戰(zhàn)爭的背景和經(jīng)過，在學習《虎門硝煙》這課時，對理解課文幫助很大。因此，我覺得小學生還是多看電視好。

正方：你說看電視影響了學習，我覺得那只是個別現(xiàn)象。據(jù)我了解，我們班成績優(yōu)秀的同學看電視看得也很多，可他們的學習成績不僅沒有下降，還提高了呢！

正方：是啊，你不學習光看電視肯定不是好孩子，為什么不完成作業(yè)再看電視呢？沒有人讓你廢寢忘食看電視，你自己管不住自己，還埋怨看電視，這不是強詞奪理、胡攪蠻纏嗎？

正方：影響視力的多了，躺著看書會影響視力，營養(yǎng)不良缺乏維生素AD也會影響視力，我沒聽說哪個孩子害怕影響視力不挑食、不吃飯??！這和看電視有什么關系？只能說明你不懂得用眼衛(wèi)生！

正方：我方認為：看電視好處多多、快樂多多。當你上了一天課，看看唐老鴨被米老鼠折磨的不像樣子時肯定笑的前仰后合，放松了你的神經(jīng)、忘記你的疲勞，何樂而不為？當你晚上給媽媽端一杯茶，陪媽媽看韓國連續(xù)劇，感受細膩的人間溫情時，不覺得這本身就是一副天倫之樂的圖畫嗎？你不看《鐵嘴銅牙紀曉嵐》怎么知道和珅是乾隆皇帝最寵愛的臣子，難道等到你能夠通讀滿清歷史的時候才去了解？你不看電視如何知道神六如何發(fā)射、定位、回收？如何知道航天員怎樣在太空里生活？你不看電視知道薩達姆長什么樣？知道櫻木花道是誰？當人家說你像“大熊”一樣的時候，你還不知道說你像“機器貓”里頭腦簡單、四肢發(fā)達的那個傻大個呢，那樣的話別人還不認為是“弱智”？因此，看電視能跟上時代的潮流，能最快捷、全方位接受來自世界的信息，這是讀書看報所望塵莫及的。所以說，多看電視好處多！

總結性發(fā)言

正方：通過采訪，我們知道了小學生看電視確實有好處，看電視可以增長我們的知識，開闊我們的視界。電視上可以看到豐富的、形象的畫面，又可以聽到動聽的聲音，可以訓練我們的各種能力，更是我們小學生容易接受的一種知識“充電”形式。如 “動畫片、大風車節(jié)目、動物世界、祖國各地”等都可以看，但不要太迷戀，要有節(jié)制，否則對我們的視力和學習、身體都有影響。

第五篇：開車能否打電話-辯論賽相關總結

1、Maybe,not likely.I’m not sure whether it is dangerous or not.What I can surely say is that we won’t stop eating fish just because of the possibility of dying of the fishbone, and that we won’t stop swimming just because of the likelihoodof dying of a drowning accident.2、People always overstate the influence of talking on a cell phone while driving, and there are so many factors involved when an accident happened, such as the road situation, wet or dry;the weather, sunny or rainy;even the car-driver’s personal skills.We just cannot simply attribute any accidents to the telephone while driving.3、Due to the development of communication technology, a more convenient and more advanced technology called ‘hand-free phone’ has become part of people’s life especially those people who frequently drove.It needs you to do nothing except telling a name when you call on somebody.It’s like talking to others in your car, and people always talk to others while driving.Will talk to others while driving increase the likelihood of accidents? Do we need to make a law to stop talking while driving? Of course not,we just accept it as a way of life.4、I don’t think the problem is with the cell phones themselves.People can be distracted while driving by so many things: phones, food, drinking, putting on make-up, changing the radio-CDS, even talking to someone beside you.Do you really think it is possible that when you need doing something like those behaviors while driving,you would stop driving and then accomplish it?

5、Researches by scientists show that different person has different reaction time about the road situation, and that drivers are slower in their reactions when a phone conversation just has started, but the effect reduces over time.What I mean is that when you need talking on a cell phone, it’s OK after paying more attentions to the road situation and making sure no pedestrians and cars in your eyes or the rearview mirror.6、How many coutries in the world ? 226 including 199 countries and 27 areas.which coutries have laws related to cellphone use while driving ? 40 countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Botswana, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Singapore, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, the United Kingdom and Zimbabwe.Just 18 percent of all countries in the world.Furthermore, most countries just prohibit the use of hand-held phones while driving, not including the hand-free phones.人們總是過度夸大開車打手機的影響，藍牙的出現(xiàn)使得該影響微乎其微：

People always exaggerate the influence of talking on the cellphone while driving.Actually,with the invention of Bluetooth, drivers needn’t to use one hand to hold cellphone and just use another hand to drive.Now,they can just pay a little attention to the talking and keep to enjoy their driving.開車打電話的四點好處：

Talking on the cellphone while driving have many benifit to drivers.Firstly,it can help drivers to keep attention.For example:when a driver is fatigue,his father or mother give a call to remind him of attention,the driver will be more careful and energetic during the following few hours.Secondly, Talking on the cellphone makes driving more safety.Because drivers tend to reduce the speed when talking on the cellphone.As is know to everyone,the faster speed,the biger danger.So,Talking on the cellphone makes driving more safety.Thirdly, Talking on the cellphone while driving allow people to make full use of time.Maybe you want to tell your boss what have done today,a minutes talking is enough;Maybe you want to tell the girl that i love you,a minutes talking is enough;and maybe you want to tell your mother that i will be home,a minutes talking is also enough;Finally,Talking on the cellphone Improve the work efficiency.Because by cellphone talking, taxi drivers,ambulance drivers and policemen could communicate with colleagues to kown which routes has a small traffic flow,then,make the best choice and improve the work efficiency.In conclusion,Talking on the cellphone while driving have so many advantages,of course,It’s Ok!

有電話不接的壞處：不接比接更危險

If your cellphone is ringing while driving,will you anser the phone,yes or no?(對方說no以后）I am pity that your choice is so bad.Because during the following few hours,your attention will be absorbed in the missed call.You will think many questions such as who is calling me? What happened and why he calls me? Wow,I wonder that how can you concentrate on your driving in this situation?So,in order to ensure a safety driving,please use your bluetooth to answer the call,don't hesitate any more!Remember,for the cellphone ringing while driving,neglect is more dangerous than answer.對方說停車到路邊安全的地方再接電話

Generally speaking,your method is usually not practical.On one hand,there are no parking districts on the midway of road in many situations,especially in the highway.As a result,it is likely to cause illegal parking problems.On the other hand,your method will lower traffic efficiency and increase traffic pressures,even cause a traffic jam.So,why don’t you talking on cellphone while driving? An accident is not because of your cellphone talking but your unnecessary worry.Don’t think too much,every drivers can do well with confidence.It is ok to Talking on the cellphone while driving 打電話和聽廣播一樣對司機負面影響不大,并且都有正面影響。Do you agree drivers listening car radio?yes or no? 如果對面說YES：Thanks for your approvements.But what i want to tell you is that cellphone talking by bluetooth while driving have little difference with listening car radio.Because both of them can make a distraction from driving.But,this small distraction is affordable.So,if a driver can listen car radio while driving,why he can not to talking on the cellphone? 如果對面說NO：If a driver cannot listening car radio while driving，why radio device exist in every car？why our country did’t forbid listening car radio when forbiding talking on the cellphone? Let me tell you the reason,because listening car radio and talking on the cellphone,both of them have a little influence on the driving.問對方，任何時候開車都不能打電話嗎？然后舉例交通堵塞時可以打以說明已方觀點

Do you think drivers should not Talking on the cellphone while driving in anytime? 如果對方說YES：OK,let me show you a picture.It is a sunny day,because of a traffic jam,a great many of cars are blocking in the road.But drivers feel happiness and not anxious at all.Because they are talking on the cellphone with friends or relatives.Don’t worry anything,a short-time cellphone talking during the long-time waiting is absolutely safety.So,Talking on the cellphone while driving is Ok!如果對方說NO：That is to say,talking on the cellphone while driving is ok,Thanks for your agreement.攻擊對方論點的部分(攻辯在于攻擊對方論點，使之以后不能使用，便于我方反擊)Likely 和possible Q: Define “l(fā)ikely”.A: Which means “has a good chance of being the case or of coming about”, namely “probable”.(如果對方不回答或故意回答錯，就加個“l(fā)et me tell u”，自己回答)Q: How mang chance do you think talking on a cellphone while driving will cause accident? A:(對方的答案應該只有千分之幾或萬分之幾)Q:So the chance is pretty small.Then it’s not likely, it’s possible,right?

Q:So your opinion should be “Talking on a cellphone while driving is possible to cause accidents”(這一點如果回答的是YES，攻辯完成，以后反擊句就是，U just admit “Talking on a cellphone while driving is possible to cause accidents”, not likely.)

A:(如果對方給一個相對增加量，比如比不打手機增加了多少)Q:We are talking about whether Talking on a cellphone while driving is likely to cause accidents;Not how mang chance it will increase accidents.So instead of a relative number, please give me a absolute number.A:(如果還在糾纏)Q: Let me put it this way.If there are 1000 people Talking on a cellphone while driving, how many do u think will die?(然后回到絕對量)A:(如果對方還說可能性很大)Q:Likely means“at least more than a half”(偷換感念), are u saying If there are 1000 people Talking on a cellphone, more than 500 will get into an accident?(應該沒人會說YES了，就說是possible ,not likely)

Cause accidents or not Q:Will u be more careful if u know the things u are doing might be dangerous? A:(沒人會SAY No吧，除非是傻子。他要抓著dangerous的話，我們就說”I said maybe, possibly.Please answer my question”)

Q:Are there going to be more accidents when u are driving more careful? A:

Q:So if a man know Talking on a cellphone while driving might be dangerous, he will be more careful, and according to your opinion,there will be no more accidents.(辯論里面最好先問一些看似無關卻密切相關的問題，然后讓他們自相矛盾)A:(他們?nèi)绻f大對數(shù)人不知道)Q: Then our job should be letting them no rather than forbid Talking on a cellphone while driving.(這個攻辯如果完成，以后他們在說會引起事故，我們就說。Maybe not if u aware of it.他們要是說，But they don ‘t know.我們就說，Then tell them instead of banning cellphone in a car, which will do us a lot of good.)

還有一種可能對方會逼著我們承認dangerous。我們可以說不能因為危險就不做了，因為他可以帶來很多好處（好處我方立論會說）。Q:Is Nuclear leakage dangerous or not ? A: Q: Why would we build nuclear power station if it is dangerous?(可以讓對方回答也可自答)Because it will do good to us.So if a thing will do us a lot of good and bring us a lot of convenience , Even if it is dangerous, we should do it ,it’s OK.預計辯論將會主要集中在這幾個論題上： 1：開車是否應該打電話

2：打電話是否會將開車變得危險 3：這種危險是否就可能會引發(fā)事故

顯然，論題一對我們最有利而論題三對對方最有利。我們應該準備如何將話題由三及二引導到一上來。對方觀點：開車打電話很可能會引發(fā)事故 對方可能的論點：

最基本的，打電話會分神，分神就會有危險，有危險就有可能會引發(fā)事故。首先公共輿論及新聞媒體的宣傳是對這一觀點有利的。

比如，有關調(diào)查表明有多少比例的事故是因為開車打電話而導致的。進而有些地方甚至出臺法律將開車打電話定為違法。

我方觀點：

it is ok to talk on the cell phone when driving,開車打電話是Ok的。

我們并沒有否定或者肯定打電話的危險性，我們只是說：開車打電話是Ok的。所以一開始我們應盡快把話題引到到底開車時應不應該打電話上。

避免討論開車的危險性，我們承認開車打電話危險，那么事故就有可能會發(fā)生（不管是有可能還是非常有可能，沒什么區(qū)別）；我們不承認開車打電話的危險性，這個太難了。

對方觀點：開車打電話很可能會引發(fā)事故。質(zhì)問：那是不是因為這個就不能打電話了？

對方三種回答1：不能打了——我們把他們逼到了一個極端，我們可以舉出好多不得不打電話的例子。

2：看情況，道路情況允許則可以打，否則不可以——我們可以認為他們已經(jīng)部分的承認的我方的觀點。

3：可以打——直接KO 總結部分：

我方認為：開車時打電話是OK的，我方不否認開車打電話所隱含的潛在危險，但是更相信以人類的主觀能動性可以很好的處理打電話與開車安全性之間的問題，對方辯友們明顯低估了人類處理多任務的能力。我們反對因為幾次事故就將打電話與開車這兩件事情放到對立面上去。

至于有些地方政府立法禁止的問題，這就類似于因為有人用刀砍了人，于是政府就立法禁售菜刀一樣。表面上是為了公共安全，實則是有關部門懶得尋找深層次原因，急忙出臺一刀切式的政策為自己在某些方面的監(jiān)管不到位而推卸責任。是典型的指標不治本。

對方辯友們根據(jù)一些數(shù)據(jù)就得出開車打電話與交通事故之間的對立關系未免太過草率，人們開車時可能受到的干擾來源非常多：收音機里引人入勝的節(jié)目、窗外有趣的東西、路邊的美女等等，好吧，現(xiàn)在假設一下有人對上述的因素與交通事故之間的關系做些調(diào)查后，以對方辯友們的思路很可能最終會得出開車時必須猶如駕駛戰(zhàn)斗機一樣目不轉(zhuǎn)睛全神貫注的荒謬結論。而現(xiàn)在為什么偏偏打電話就要成為替罪羊？反而我方認為，在認識到開車打電話的隱患后，人們會在接打電話時更加精力集中于安全駕駛，因為人們會產(chǎn)生：哦，接電話了，我得提起精神更加專心的去開車了這種想法。而對方辯友們這種頭痛醫(yī)頭腳痛醫(yī)腳的行為是典型的只見部分不見整體。它解決不了道路安全隱患，只是一些想法簡單思維幼稚的人們以一種自以為是的角度所得出的所謂良心實則粗暴的做法。

我方再次重申：開車打電話是Ok的，那些駕駛素養(yǎng)不高，不遵守交法的司機即使聽從了對方辯友的論點開車不接打電話，也會因為別的一千種原因而分神而導致事故。加強教育提高全社會尤其是司機的道路素養(yǎng)，遠比簡單的一個“禁止”或一個“不能”更能消除事故安全隱患。大禹治水，靠疏不靠堵。

老話說的好：Too young too simple, sometimes na?ve.