第一篇：安樂死_baidu翻譯_英語辯論（共）

（?。┌矘匪朗菤⑷恕Ｃ恳粋€生命是如此的重要。人不能只為自己而活，但他們也活在他們的家庭和社會。如果他們選擇離開這個世界，他們不為自己負(fù)責(zé)，他們的家庭和社會。

安樂死是輕視生命。生命是如此的珍貴?；颊邞?yīng)該珍惜自己的生命。他們應(yīng)該盡力戰(zhàn)勝絕癥。每個人都應(yīng)該表現(xiàn)出對生命的基本尊重。無論發(fā)生什么，我們應(yīng)該面對事實，我們應(yīng)該生活在巨大的勇氣，我們應(yīng)該相信奇跡。沒有什么是不可能的。我們認(rèn)為，安樂死不應(yīng)legeled（?。?/p>

安樂死停藥的發(fā)展。如果患者需要使用安樂死，醫(yī)生不會盡力挽救病人。這藥會停止進(jìn)步。如果安樂死合法化，安樂死的病人使用將受到法律保護(hù)。醫(yī)生的權(quán)利將是顯而易見的。醫(yī)生有太多的權(quán)力，可以是錯誤的或不道德的。病人把自己的信仰和信任醫(yī)生的意見。

人們?yōu)E用安樂死合法化時，它會危害人的生命。在安樂死的名義，進(jìn)行自殺。能發(fā)生奇跡般的治療或復(fù)蘇。你永遠(yuǎn)不能低估了人的精神力量。

它把人的生命價值。在這個國家，人的生命意味著什么。

它可以打開閘門非危重病人自殺和濫用。任何松動的協(xié)助自殺的法律最終可能導(dǎo)致特權(quán)的濫用。許多宗教禁止自殺和他人的故意殺人。最基本的戒律是“不可殺人”。

保險公司可以把不必要的壓力，避免孤注一擲的措施或建議醫(yī)生協(xié)助自殺的過程。健康保險提供者保持保費(fèi)下降在巨大的壓力下。

安樂死可以成為一種手段，遏制醫(yī)療成本。醫(yī)生和其他醫(yī)護(hù)人員不應(yīng)參與直接導(dǎo)致死亡。

安樂死在道德上是不正確的，應(yīng)該被法律所禁止的。這是一個殺人和殺害別人不能合理化在任何情況下。

人的生命是特殊的安全保護(hù)。先進(jìn)的醫(yī)療技術(shù)已經(jīng)使得有可能提高人類的壽命和生活質(zhì)量。姑息治療和康復(fù)中心是更好的選擇來幫助殘疾人或病人接近死亡生活的痛苦自由和更好的生活。

家庭成員的影響病人的決定為安樂死以權(quán)謀私喜歡財富傳承是另一個問題。你是沒有辦法可以知道是否真的對協(xié)助自殺是自愿或被迫由別人決定。

安樂死會導(dǎo)致醫(yī)療保健和最脆弱的社會造成受害下降。將安樂死將自己從“死的權(quán)利”，“殺”嗎？ 如何評估是否有心理性障礙使安樂死？如果疼痛閾值低于最優(yōu)和病人感知的情況下是不值得活嗎？如何知道死的愿望是不平衡的思維過程或精神病患者的邏輯決定的結(jié)果？如果個人選擇協(xié)助自殺作為一種選擇和家人不同意嗎？

面對離別，無奈，失去自控，死亡和悲傷，恐懼，所以多數(shù)患者會經(jīng)歷精神上的痛苦。在這種心理需求下的“安樂死”，我們可以說他是合理的嗎？”根據(jù)研究自殺，自殺和治愈的精神疾病本質(zhì)上是相關(guān)的，但不是致命的疾病，研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，在44例晚期癌癥患者，只有三想過自殺，但有一個嚴(yán)重的抑郁癥。另一項研究表明，85的人自殺，只有一個人患了絕癥，和90-100%的自殺都患有明顯的心理疾病。

不可否認(rèn)，現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué)實踐中緩慢死亡的過程中，經(jīng)常提到的病人梅，尊嚴(yán)個人特色的喪失，獨立性和自主性。

然而，安樂死是個人的自主行為表達(dá)，這是錯誤的。原因：

（一）自主動安樂死需要幫助，那么它就不是一個人的事情，而是開放的或公共的東西。（b）在公開承認(rèn)自衛(wèi)，戰(zhàn)爭的形式正義，死刑和謀殺，只為大家保衛(wèi)生命，不被殺死的人的利益。所以，即使死亡是痛苦的解脫，不能輕易帶走生命權(quán)致力于個人。（C）即使人的自決權(quán)確認(rèn)選擇死亡，這并不意味著權(quán)利要求別人殺死自己，并不包括有權(quán)授權(quán)自殺別人。（D）自治，包括奴隸制的權(quán)利從來不是自己的，換句話說，這(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is so precious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ right will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he is reasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.所以要保持自主性，需要保護(hù)的生命，給他人的生命權(quán)是不踐踏獨立自主的原則。因此，個人的自主性和社會需要和公共目標(biāo)和價值觀是一致的。

結(jié)尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“, meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ means to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discrimination against euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” “ Euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of terminally ill patient.Death, as natural as birth, is sometimes a hard process that requires assistance, and euthanasia is part of such assistance.People have the right to die.It is unnecessary to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness.Extending an incurably ill patient’s life means the same as aggravating his pain.Efforts should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meaningless existence.Euthanasia can bring mental and physical release to the patient and his family when he is terminally ill and has no prospect of recovering.Mercy killing is motivated by nothing but love and sympathy for the dying patient.Most of the terminally ill patients themselves want to die with dignity and peace instead of agony and degradation.Medical treatment for a comatose patient cause great burden economically for the hospital and the patient’s family.It is inhumane to perform euthanasia no matter how painless the process is.Anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer.Euthanasia is a criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person.Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be conveniently dubbed “mercy killing ”by unscrupulous people.Euthanasia raises many moral issues since it implies that active measures are taken to terminate human life.Doctors and nurses should do everything they can to save dying patients instead of hastening their death by active measures.The instinct for self-preservation is the strongest instinct that human beings possess.It is untrue that any patient himself should want to die.Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profession, for euthanasia is a violation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life.積極安樂死可能會逐漸失去它的自發(fā)性，因此在（我）“秘密安樂死”，這意味著沒有自己的同意，是醫(yī)生實施安樂死。

（二）“被迫安樂死”，意味著患有絕癥的病人會威逼引誘選擇安樂死以減輕經(jīng)濟(jì)和心理壓力，他們的家庭，節(jié)約有限的社會資源，患者選擇了死，不覺得生活是一種負(fù)擔(dān)或厭倦了生活，但他覺得別人的負(fù)擔(dān)，而別人不喜歡。

（三）“副安樂死”是讓患者缺乏能力的自決”代理決策人“安樂死。

（四）“歧視”，“危機(jī)是患者如貧困或少數(shù)民族種類數(shù)，可能是“聰明”的力量，“安樂死”的要求，對他人的憐憫。使病人陷入兩反對派之間產(chǎn)量的困境，從而導(dǎo)致額外的不必要的恐懼和焦慮。信息可以聽到：“死亡是可怕的！你對安樂死的最佳選擇?！?的滑波，一旦“安樂死”合法化，它的使用將不可避免地延伸到其他類型的患者，但不是死的，如果沒有治愈的患者，但不是不治之癥，那么阿爾茨海默病或腦退化的風(fēng)險，即使是那些有嚴(yán)重殘疾的唐氏綜合征嬰兒出世。等。所以，如果這種說法，一旦建立，只會造成恐慌，擔(dān)心他們會被強(qiáng)行送往“安樂死”的行列。因此，我同意frasen說，“人的一生，只是錯誤的可能性，足以完全拒絕“安樂死”?！?/p>

安樂死是人道的因為它有助于加速病人的死亡。

死亡，就像出生一樣自然，有時是一個艱難的過程，需要協(xié)助，安樂死就是這種協(xié)助的一部分。人有死的權(quán)利。

這是不必要的人為保持超越點生活的人們再也不會恢復(fù)意識。延伸的一個絕癥病人的生活方式，加重了他的痛苦一樣。努力不應(yīng)該永遠(yuǎn)成為一個毫無意義的存在是什么。

安樂死可以當(dāng)他是身患絕癥無望恢復(fù)帶來的身心釋放到病人和他的家人。安樂死的動機(jī)只是對臨終病人的愛與同情。

大多數(shù)的絕癥病人自己想死而不是痛苦和退化的尊嚴(yán)與和平。

一個昏迷的病人造成很大的負(fù)擔(dān)，在經(jīng)濟(jì)上為醫(yī)院和患者的家庭治療。這是不人道的執(zhí)行安樂死無論是無痛。

誰自愿，故意或預(yù)謀以另一個生命，甚至死前一分鐘，是一個殺手。安樂死是犯罪，因為它涉及到一個人的死亡。

安樂死合法化會招致對人類生命的濫用，因為任何形式的謀殺許多被方便地稱為“安樂死”不擇手段的人。

安樂死提出了很多道德問題，因為它意味著要采取主動措施終止生命。醫(yī)生和護(hù)士應(yīng)該盡他們所能挽救垂死的病人而不是采取積極措施加速其死亡。

自我保護(hù)的本能，是人類擁有的最強(qiáng)大的本能。它是不真實的，任何病人他自己應(yīng)該死。執(zhí)行安樂死的醫(yī)生和護(hù)士已經(jīng)讓他們的職業(yè)，因為安樂死違反基本醫(yī)療原則拯救人的生命。安樂死是醫(yī)學(xué)界最具爭議的問題之一。以上圖所示，一晚生病的母親拼命生病的兒子請求安樂死。但的兒子是削減這。無助，因為他是束手無策了。

這幅畫確實發(fā)人深省。這意味著，人們對安樂死的態(tài)度。有些人認(rèn)為這是什么別人認(rèn)為so.now讓我們聽聽大家的不同意見

Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine.As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia.But the son was cut for this。feeling helpless because he is at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinking.It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing.Some people think it is right.but others dont think so.now let us listen to everyone's different opinions 安樂死是醫(yī)學(xué)界最有爭議的問題之一。正如上面所示的視頻所描繪的，一位晚期患病母親病入膏肓，請求兒子實施安樂死。但兒子且為此獲罪，感到無能為力，因為他們不知道該怎么辦。這幅畫確實發(fā)人深省。它暗示，人們在對待安樂死上看法不一致。有些人認(rèn)為他是對的，但其他的不這樣認(rèn)為，現(xiàn)在讓我們聽聽大家的不同觀點

贊成

1.If a person loses the survivability of the community has not contributed to lose the meaning of life.reduce reliance on others and a burden on society.如果一個人失去了生存能力，對社會沒有了貢獻(xiàn)，也就失去了生命的意義，減少對別人的倚賴和對社會的負(fù)擔(dān)。

2.the complete elimination of euthanasia patients can be painful diseases, mental stress and depression thinking exists.安樂死可以徹底消除病人的疾病痛苦，精神壓力和思想懮愁

3.a person bound to die sooner or later die;One hundred dead, the living dead are free, patients and relatives reflex happy 人總難免一死，早晚都是死；一死百了，死人活人都解脫，患者與親朋皆大歡

4.the lives of their own people, individuals have the right to end their lives, which is opposed to the human rights and personal freedom.人的生命屬于自己，個人有權(quán)結(jié)束生命，這是個人自由和獨享的人權(quán)

5.we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.安樂死是尊重生命的一種方式。

6.首先，從主觀方面來講，安樂死對于病人自身，是一種減少生命痛苦的方式。人，總是趨利避害的，沒有人會說“我要去尋找痛苦，我要去遠(yuǎn)離快樂”。當(dāng)一個人處于精神和軀體的極端痛苦之下，當(dāng)生命的存在已成為一場噩夢，我們難道還要 提及道德和倫理嗎？生存這個基本的“長度”都已經(jīng)不能夠維持，還要來談及生命的寬度，還要去顧及倫理的重量嗎？

First,from a subjective point of view.Euthanasia for the patients themselves, is a way to reduce human suffering.People always seek advantages and avoid disadvantages, and no one would say, ”I am going to look painful, I had to go far from happy.“When a person is under extreme suffering in the body and the spirit, when the very existence of life has become a nightmare.Should we mention the moral and ethical?The basic survival of the ”length“ are not able to maintain, but also to talk about the breadth of life,we still have to take into account the weight of ethics?

7.We feel this suffering, we have come with this then you have no choice in the circumstances, we have chosen euthanasia.This is not contempt for life, nor is it moral decline.Instead, it was a time in the lives of torment and suffering to the loved ones around us to the people we love.more acceptable alternative to the road.Therefore, we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.我們感受著這種痛苦，我們體會著這個中滋味，在無法選擇的情況下，我們選擇了安樂死。這不是對生命的藐視，也不是道德的淪喪。反而，這是一種

在生命面臨煎熬和磨難的時候，為我們身邊的親人，為我們愛著的人，選擇另一條更容易接受的道路。因此，我方認(rèn)為，安樂死是尊重生命的一種方式.反對

1.Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life 安樂死是拒絕了人類生活的意義和價值 2，”euthanasia" if legal form confirm down, may be some people use to depriving the life of others.In addition, to the understanding of the disease in humans is still very limited circumstances, without legal license and others end life, contrary to the right to live moral principles.“安樂死”如果以法律形式確認(rèn)下來，可能會被一些人利用，用以非法剝奪他人的生命。另外，在人類對疾病的認(rèn)識還十分有限的情況下，未經(jīng)法律許可而結(jié)束他人生命，有悖于生存權(quán)利的道德準(zhǔn)則。

3.Oppose euthanasia people have argued that the euthanasia is a violation of the laws of nature and death against natural behavior, weaken the human overcome the disaster of the strength and courage.反對安樂死合法化的人士則認(rèn)為，安樂死是違反生老病死自然規(guī)律的反自然行為，削弱了人類戰(zhàn)勝災(zāi)難的力量和勇氣。

4.Euthanasia is disguised violations of the right to life 安樂死是變相侵害生命權(quán)

第二篇：安樂死_英語辯論

(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is so precious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ right will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he is reasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.結(jié)尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“, meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ means to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discrimination against euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” “ Euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of terminally ill patient.Death, as natural as birth, is sometimes a hard process that requires assistance, and euthanasia is part of such assistance.People have the right to die.It is unnecessary to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness.Extending an incurably ill patient’s life means the same as aggravating his pain.Efforts should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meaningless existence.Euthanasia can bring mental and physical release to the patient and his family when he is terminally ill and has no prospect of recovering.Mercy killing is motivated by nothing but love and sympathy for the dying patient.Most of the terminally ill patients themselves want to die with dignity and peace instead of agony and degradation.Medical treatment for a comatose patient cause great burden economically for the hospital and the patient’s family.It is inhumane to perform euthanasia no matter how painless the process is.Anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer.Euthanasia is a criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person.Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be conveniently dubbed “mercy killing ”by unscrupulous people.Euthanasia raises many moral issues since it implies that active measures are taken to terminate human life.Doctors and nurses should do everything they can to save dying patients instead of hastening their death by active measures.The instinct for self-preservation is the strongest instinct that human beings possess.It is untrue that any patient himself should want to die.Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profession, for euthanasia is a violation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life.Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine.As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia.But the son was cut for this。feeling helpless because he is at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinking.It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing.Some people think it is right.but others dont think so.now let us listen to everyone's different opinions 安樂死是醫(yī)學(xué)界最有爭議的問題之一。正如上面所示的視頻所描繪的，一位晚期患病母親病入膏肓，請求兒子實施安樂死。但兒子且為此獲罪，感到無能為力，因為他們不知道該怎么辦。這幅畫確實發(fā)人深省。它暗示，人們在對待安樂死上看法不一致。有些人認(rèn)為他是對的，但其他的不這樣認(rèn)為，現(xiàn)在讓我們聽聽大家的不同觀點

贊成

1.If a person loses the survivability of the community has not contributed to lose the meaning of life.reduce reliance on others and a burden on society.如果一個人失去了生存能力，對社會沒有了貢獻(xiàn)，也就失去了生命的意義，減少對別人的倚賴和對社會的負(fù)擔(dān)。

2.the complete elimination of euthanasia patients can be painful diseases, mental stress and depression thinking exists.安樂死可以徹底消除病人的疾病痛苦，精神壓力和思想懮愁

3.a person bound to die sooner or later die;One hundred dead, the living dead are free, patients and relatives reflex happy 人總難免一死，早晚都是死；一死百了，死人活人都解脫，患者與親朋皆大歡

4.the lives of their own people, individuals have the right to end their lives, which is opposed to the human rights and personal freedom.人的生命屬于自己，個人有權(quán)結(jié)束生命，這是個人自由和獨享的人權(quán)

5.we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.安樂死是尊重生命的一種方式。

6.首先，從主觀方面來講，安樂死對于病人自身，是一種減少生命痛苦的方式。人，總是趨利避害的，沒有人會說“我要去尋找痛苦，我要去遠(yuǎn)離快樂”。當(dāng)一個人處于精神和軀體的極端痛苦之下，當(dāng)生命的存在已成為一場噩夢，我們難道還要 提及道德和倫理嗎？生存這個基本的“長度”都已經(jīng)不能夠維持，還要來談及生命的寬度，還要去顧及倫理的重量嗎？

First,from a subjective point of view.Euthanasia for the patients themselves, is a way to reduce human suffering.People always seek advantages and avoid disadvantages, and no one would say, ”I am going to look painful, I had to go far from happy.“When a person is under extreme suffering in the body and the spirit, when the very existence of life has become a nightmare.Should we mention the moral and ethical?The basic survival of the ”length“ are not able to maintain, but also to talk about the breadth of life,we still have to take into account the weight of ethics?

7.We feel this suffering, we have come with this then you have no choice in the circumstances, we have chosen euthanasia.This is not contempt for life, nor is it moral decline.Instead, it was a time in the lives of torment and suffering to the loved ones around us to the people we love.more acceptable alternative to the road.Therefore, we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.我們感受著這種痛苦，我們體會著這個中滋味，在無法選擇的情況下，我們選擇了安樂死。這不是對生命的藐視，也不是道德的淪喪。反而，這是一種

在生命面臨煎熬和磨難的時候，為我們身邊的親人，為我們愛著的人，選擇另一條更容易接受的道路。因此，我方認(rèn)為，安樂死是尊重生命的一種方式.反對

1.Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life 安樂死是拒絕了人類生活的意義和價值

2，”euthanasia" if legal form confirm down, may be some people use to depriving the life of others.In addition, to the understanding of the disease in humans is still very limited circumstances, without legal license and others end life, contrary to the right to live moral principles.“安樂死”如果以法律形式確認(rèn)下來，可能會被一些人利用，用以非法剝奪他人的生命。另外，在人類對疾病的認(rèn)識還十分有限的情況下，未經(jīng)法律許可而結(jié)束他人生命，有悖于生存權(quán)利的道德準(zhǔn)則。

3.Oppose euthanasia people have argued that the euthanasia is a violation of the laws of nature and death against natural behavior, weaken the human overcome the disaster of the strength and courage.反對安樂死合法化的人士則認(rèn)為，安樂死是違反生老病死自然規(guī)律的反自然行為，削弱了人類戰(zhàn)勝災(zāi)難的力量和勇氣。

4.Euthanasia is disguised violations of the right to life 安樂死是變相侵害生命權(quán)

第三篇：安樂死 英語辯論

(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is so precious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ right will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he is reasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.結(jié)尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“, meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ means to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discrimination against euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” "

第四篇：英語安樂死辯論正方

英語安樂死正方辯論

Good morning ,everyone;my name is Yang.I am the first debater on positive side.Here are my opinions.，F(xiàn)irst I will state the definaton of euthanasia,that is people who are attacked by incurable disease can’t surffer from the pains and decide to employ a humane way to end their lives without pain.2，Second, as with survival, death is a kind of human rights.When he felt happier than survival of death, he has the right to choose death, society should meet the people's needs, and give every person who is suffering incurable disease to choose the right euthanasia.So citizens have the right to choose the way of death.It is another case of freedom of choice.3，Third , for mortally ill patients, long life actually only means extend pain.For them to end their lives is a kind of happiness, It provides a way to relieve extreme pain, and this conforms to humanism.4，F(xiàn)outh , this way can free up medical funds to help other people and reduce the burden of family and society.In this regard,it takes family members’ interest and supplies a lot of benefits to society.5，so according to the previous paper, we have reasons to believe that euthanasia is a proper way, not only does it respect personal dignity,but also helps with social development.And it is the performance of human civilization progress too.That’s all my ideas ,thank you

第五篇：英語辯論-安樂死合法化

安樂死合法化

正方：

We think it’s necessary.On one hand, we can save our limiting medical resources for those who need treatment than any other people.On the other hand, we can keep patients from endless paint.我們認(rèn)為這是有必要的。一方面，我們可以節(jié)約有限的醫(yī)療資源給其他更需要的治療的病人。另一方面，我們可以解脫這些受著無盡的痛苦的病人。

補(bǔ)充觀點：

1.Euthanasia can release the stress of the society, if the patients can’t do any contribution.如果那個病人無法做出任何貢獻(xiàn)，那么安樂死可以減輕社會的負(fù)擔(dān)。

2.Euthanasia can free the patients who are under heavy paint.安樂死可以解脫那些正承受著巨大痛苦的病人。

3.A person’s life belongs to himself, he has access to end his life.一個人的生命屬于他自己，他有權(quán)結(jié)束自己的生命。

反方：

I think we shouldn’t make euthanasia legal.Otherwise, some people may commit suicide through this way, which offer them an easy way to die.In addition, it can be an legal way to deprive(剝奪)people’s life, for those who have evil intentions.So, I don’t agree this point.補(bǔ)充觀點：

1.Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life 安樂死是拒絕了人類生活的意義和價值

1.The poor will truly be killed by poverty through euthanasia, because of no money for treatment.窮人會真正地被貧窮以這種形式給殺死，因為沒錢治療。

2.Euthanasia is disguised violations of the right to life 安樂死是變相侵害生命權(quán)