第一篇：一個環(huán)保者的力量

環(huán)保志愿者（一個人的力量）

一、杰?！に髂线_杰原青海治多縣西部工委書記以生命保護藏羚羊

二、梁從誡原全國政協(xié)常委、歷史學(xué)家創(chuàng)辦自然之友，引爆民間環(huán)保

三、廖曉義原中國社科院哲學(xué)所助理研究員從傳統(tǒng)文化挖掘中式環(huán)保模式

四、霍岱珊原河南周口日報攝影記者多次考察淮河，成為淮河衛(wèi)士

五、馬軍原外企員工開放污染地圖，倒逼污染企業(yè)

六、梅念蜀原環(huán)境公司員工促進《昆明地下水保護條例》出臺

七、程景北京百子灣小區(qū)居民檢測電磁環(huán)境，破解鄰居疑慮

八、韋東英浙江蕭山普通農(nóng)民撰寫抗污日記，舉報錢塘江污染

九、宋軍九漢天成公司董事長在環(huán)境貧困地區(qū)發(fā)展生態(tài)產(chǎn)業(yè)

十、劉曉光首創(chuàng)集團總經(jīng)理跪地一哭，引來一百位企業(yè)家參與環(huán)境保護

一個人的力量，環(huán)保志愿者的力量

渺小者，會在艱難之間，變得偉大。

當(dāng)你感覺無力的時候，你已經(jīng)有了力量。因為，你覺得環(huán)境與你有關(guān)。

當(dāng)你想付出的時候，你已經(jīng)能夠超越，因為，你能做許多事。

1993年，可可西里采金和盜獵達到瘋狂地步。青海治多縣西部工委書記，索南達杰，有一天想，如果權(quán)力無法阻止藏羚羊被屠殺，那么即使權(quán)力掛腰全身，又有什么用處？于是，他把手中很小的權(quán)力，成了環(huán)境保護巨大的力量。

1994年1月8日，索南達杰在抓獲盜獵分子的途中，為了救治受傷的盜獵分子，他被盜獵分子殺害。他的身體，在零下三十多度的氣溫下，永遠保持著射擊的姿式；他的身體，成為可可西里的環(huán)境保護神。

更多的環(huán)保志愿者跟上來了。

梁從誡，歷史學(xué)家，因為不忍心看到中國環(huán)境惡化下去，1994年，他和三個朋友，一起創(chuàng)立了中國第一個民間環(huán)保組織“自然之友”。從此，緩慢地引爆了中國民間環(huán)保的能量。他們使用著一個共同的名字，他們叫，環(huán)保志愿者。

他們試圖保護身邊受傷害的每一個生靈。

（志愿者保護物種向殺戮者奮起反擊的畫面）

（北京山水呂植保護熊貓，奚志農(nóng)保護滇金絲猴，溫州綠眼睛保護青蛙等）

有一天，在中國社科院哲學(xué)所工作的廖曉義，讀到一篇論文，論文說，生態(tài)文明在中國可能很難實現(xiàn)，生態(tài)惡化將不可阻擋。

廖曉義突然想，如果知識無法保護環(huán)境，那么知識又有什么用處？

她決心成為環(huán)保志愿者。

1996年，她創(chuàng)立了北京地球村環(huán)境教育中心，她想把城市所有的社區(qū)，都變成綠色社

區(qū)；她想從中國傳統(tǒng)文化中汲取力量，阻止環(huán)境惡化。

霍岱珊，河南周口日報攝影記者，1997年，他孤身考察淮河，從此成了“淮河衛(wèi)士”，把淮河飽受摧殘的真相，告訴給公眾。

中國最好的環(huán)保作家唐錫陽、徐剛、沈孝輝、郭耕，也是這樣的，他們用盡自己的心血，去寫中國沖突最劇烈的文字，讓人們看到了中國生態(tài)的現(xiàn)實，激勵人們奮起拯救身邊的環(huán)境。

（四五個民間環(huán)保人士）

1998年開始，北京九漢天成公司董事長宋軍，想在西北干旱地區(qū)，探索出一條生態(tài)產(chǎn)業(yè)化道路，他建起了月亮湖沙漠度假區(qū)。

2004年，著名房地產(chǎn)公司首創(chuàng)集團的董事長劉曉光，跪在阿拉善月亮湖邊的沙地上，放聲大哭。

他發(fā)現(xiàn)，當(dāng)很多人一門心思拼命掙錢的時候，我們的環(huán)境已經(jīng)惡化到了不可收拾的地步。他想，如果環(huán)境全面惡化了，水全部弄臟了，樹全部砍光了，沙子蓋滿城市，即使人人都擁有一座金山，又有什么用處？

他從此成為環(huán)保志愿者，把積累財富所獲得的力量，化為環(huán)境保護的力量。

2004年6月5日，王石、馮侖、宋軍、張樹新等100名中國優(yōu)秀企業(yè)家，站在阿拉善月亮湖的懺悔墻邊，發(fā)布了《阿拉善宣言》。

這些財富等身的人，從此都成了環(huán)保志愿者。他們創(chuàng)辦的阿拉善SEE生態(tài)協(xié)會，成為中國環(huán)保志愿者的強大資助力量。他們所在的企業(yè)，都在成為環(huán)保型企業(yè)。

（不超過10名企業(yè)家）

在中國大地上，幾乎每一個人，都具備“環(huán)保志愿者”的潛質(zhì)。只要你愿意。

因為，如果環(huán)境惡化了，我們活著，又有什么意義？

因為，如果空氣和水都活不下去了，我們又怎么可能活得下去？

2005年，因為創(chuàng)作《中國水危機》而名滿天下的馬軍，從一家外企辭職，正式成為了環(huán)保志愿者。他帶領(lǐng)公眾環(huán)境研究中心，決心把中國的污染現(xiàn)狀，做到一張電子地圖上，讓所有的人都可以見到。

2007年，梅念蜀正式從環(huán)保志愿者，成了“民間環(huán)保人士”，她帶領(lǐng)昆明的志愿者們，對滇池周邊地下水污染情況進行了調(diào)查，直接促成了《昆明地下水保護條例》的出臺。

2003年底，因為無法再忍受錢塘江被一天天污染，無法忍受村里的環(huán)境日益惡化，浙江蕭山的農(nóng)婦韋東英，以只有小學(xué)五年級的文化，每天堅持寫“抗污日記”，堅持拍攝村里的污染企業(yè)排放的污水，堅持向監(jiān)管部門舉報，成了錢塘江邊，最受尊重的人。

2009年的正月初一，北京百子灣小區(qū)的普通居民程景，在小區(qū)BBS上貼出公告，告訴鄰居們，經(jīng)過他自費長達數(shù)月的檢測，小區(qū)的電磁環(huán)境并不像大家擔(dān)憂的那么糟糕。受他的影響，一個名叫達爾問自然求知社的環(huán)?？破战M織出現(xiàn)了，他們的目標(biāo)，就是幫助公眾發(fā)現(xiàn)身邊環(huán)境真相。

因此，你不是什么都做不了，你什么都能做。

只要你尊重環(huán)境，一切就有可能。

每一個人的力量，都可以成為環(huán)保志愿者的力量。

如果你愿意，請把你的手，放在上面。

第二篇：一個送信者

一個送信者

—《把信送給加西亞》讀后感

若給你一個送信的機會，你會成功把信送給加西亞嗎？你會是安德魯·薩默斯.羅文？

《把信送給加西亞》講述了一個簡單的故事。19世紀(jì)美西戰(zhàn)爭中,美方有一封具有戰(zhàn)略意義的書信,急需送到古巴盟軍將領(lǐng)加西亞的手中,可是加西亞正在叢林作戰(zhàn),沒人知道他在什么地方。安德魯·薩默斯.羅文此接受美國總統(tǒng)麥金萊的命令，歷盡種種磨難，把那封信交給了加西亞，為最終美國取得戰(zhàn)爭的勝利做出了巨大貢獻。

故事雖然精短，卻蘊含了令人深思的道理。作為送信者，羅文身上體現(xiàn)出的不僅僅是忠誠，勇敢，還有積極主動的執(zhí)行力，這些也正是我們現(xiàn)在工作中所需要學(xué)習(xí)的品質(zhì)。

作為世界產(chǎn)銷書籍之一，《把信送給加西亞》的受歡迎程度可見一斑，正如一千讀者就有一千個哈姆雷特一樣，每個人對送信者都有自己的感悟。讀過這個故事，讓我對工作中的執(zhí)行力有了更加深刻的反思。工作中最大的敵人就是惰性，對于領(lǐng)導(dǎo)布置的任務(wù)，拖三拉四，不去積極完成，這樣對于自己打成長沒有一點好處，而且也不會給同事留下好的印象。

上級布置的工作，就是一封信，你會成功送到嗎？你會立即去執(zhí)行嗎？不會因為任務(wù)困難而推諉嗎？不可否認(rèn)，有時候?qū)τ诒容^麻煩的工作，自己面對的時候不免會抱怨，不免會推脫，結(jié)果拖到最后還是要去做，還是要去完成，而且由于前期的準(zhǔn)備不足，最終的效果非常不好，還也會耽誤一些其他事情。自己在這樣的過程中得不償失，也可以說是浪費了寶貴的時間，降級了工作效率。若是積極面對，在任務(wù)下達的時候立刻去執(zhí)行，不畏艱辛，勇敢面對，盡管困難重重，但是我相信最后一定是碩果累累。千萬不要推脫，不要往后推延，因為這樣的你是在耽誤你的青春，推脫你的生命。困難必然是有的，有困難就想辦法去解決，沒有趟不過的河，沒有爬不過的山，不會游泳的話，不是還有船的嗎？工作中有難題的話，可以請教同事，咨詢權(quán)威，都可以有相對滿意的結(jié)果的。怕的就是你不去做，沒有在第一時間邁出你的腳步，耽誤了行程。若寄予遠方，就揚帆遠航。不要找各種借口去推遲，因為這一刻不去做，或許就錯過了絕佳的機會，或許以后就沒有如此的契機了。積極面對，勇敢去做，立刻排上日程，主動去解決出現(xiàn)的問題，堅持到底，這樣的執(zhí)行力才是自己應(yīng)該去學(xué)習(xí)，去領(lǐng)悟的。

若給我一個送信的機會，我會堅定的說：我會成功把信送到。

第三篇：內(nèi)向者的力量[TED]

TED 演講稿

Susan Cain : The Power of Introverts

When I was nine years old I went off to summer camp for the first time.And my mother packed me a suitcase full of books, which to me seemed like a perfectly natural thing to do.Because in my family, reading was the primary group activity.And this might sound antisocial to you, but for us it was really just a different way of being social.You have the animal warmth of your family sitting right next to you, but you are also free to go roaming around the adventureland inside your own mind.And I had this idea that camp was going to be just like this, but better.(Laughter)I had a vision of 10 girls sitting in a cabin cozily reading books in their matching nightgowns.(Laughter)

Camp was more like a keg party without any alcohol.And on the very first day our counselor gathered us all together and she taught us a cheer that she said we would be doing every day for the rest of the summer to instill camp spirit.And it went like this: “R-O-W-D-I-E, that's the way we spell rowdie.Rowdie, rowdie, let's get rowdie.” Yeah.So I couldn't figure out for the life of me why we were supposed to be so rowdy, or why we had to spell this word incorrectly.(Laughter)But I recited a cheer.I recited a cheer along with everybody else.I did my best.And I just waited for the time that I could go off and read my books.But the first time that I took my book out of my suitcase, the coolest girl in the bunk came up to me and she asked me, “Why are you being so mellow?”--mellow, of course, being the exact opposite of R-O-W-D-I-E.And then the second time I tried it, the counselor came up to me with a concerned expression on her face and she repeated the point about camp spirit and said we should all work very hard to be outgoing.And so I put my books away, back in their suitcase, and I put them under my bed, and there they stayed for the rest of the summer.And I felt kind of guilty about this.I felt as if the books needed me somehow, and they were calling out to me and I was forsaking them.But I did forsake them and I didn't open that suitcase again until I was back home with my family at the end of the summer.Now, I tell you this story about summer camp.I could have told you 50 others just like it--all the times that I got the message that somehow my quiet and introverted style of being was not necessarily the right way to go, that I should be trying to pass as more of an extrovert.And I always sensed deep down that this was wrong and that introverts were pretty excellent just as they were.But for years I denied this intuition, and so I became a Wall Street lawyer, of all things, instead of the writer that I had always longed to be--partly because I needed to prove to myself that I could be bold and assertive too.And I was always going off to crowded bars when I really would have preferred to just have a nice dinner with friends.And I made these self-negating choices so reflexively, that I wasn't even aware that I was making them.TED 演講稿

Now this is what many introverts do, and it's our loss for sure, but it is also our colleagues' loss and our communities' loss.And at the risk of sounding grandiose, it is the world's loss.Because when it comes to creativity and to leadership, we need introverts doing what they do best.A third to a half of the population are introverts--a third to a half.So that's one out of every two or three people you know.So even if you're an extrovert yourself, I'm talking about your coworkers and your spouses and your children and the person sitting next to you right now--all of them subject to this bias that is pretty deep and real in our society.We all internalize it from a very early age without even having a language for what we're doing.Now to see the bias clearly you need to understand what introversion is.It's different from being shy.Shyness is about fear of social judgment.Introversion is more about, how do you respond to stimulation, including social stimulation.So extroverts really crave large amounts of stimulation, whereas introverts feel at their most alive and their most switched-on and their most capable when they're in quieter, more low-key environments.Not all the time--these things aren't absolute--but a lot of the time.So the key then to maximizing our talents is for us all to put ourselves in the zone of stimulation that is right for us.But now here's where the bias comes in.Our most important institutions, our schools and our workplaces, they are designed mostly for extroverts and for extroverts' need for lots of stimulation.And also we have this belief system right now that I call the new groupthink, which holds that all creativity and all productivity comes from a very oddly gregarious place.So if you picture the typical classroom nowadays: When I was going to school, we sat in rows.We sat in rows of desks like this, and we did most of our work pretty autonomously.But nowadays, your typical classroom has pods of desks--four or five or six or seven kids all facing each other.And kids are working in countless group assignments.Even in subjects like math and creative writing, which you think would depend on solo flights of thought;kids are now expected to act as committee members.And for the kids who prefer to go off by themselves or just to work alone, those kids are seen as outliers often or, worse, as problem cases.And the vast majority of teachers reports believing that the ideal student is an extrovert as opposed to an introvert, even though introverts actually get better grades and are more knowledgeable, according to research.(Laughter)

Okay, same thing is true in our workplaces.Now, most of us work in open plan offices,without walls, where we are subject to the constant noise and gaze of our coworkers.And when it comes to leadership, introverts are routinely passed over for leadership positions,even though introverts tend to be very careful, much less likely to take outsize risks--which is something we might all favor nowadays.And interesting research by Adam Grant at the Wharton School has found that introverted leaders often deliver better outcomes than extroverts do, because when they are managing proactive employees, they're much more likely to let those employees run with their ideas, whereas an extrovert can, quite unwittingly, get so excited about things that they're putting their own stamp on things, and other people's ideas might not as easily then bubble up to the surface.TED 演講稿

Now in fact, some of our transformative leaders in history have been introverts.I'll give you some examples.Eleanor Roosevelt, Rosa Parks, Gandhi--all these peopled described themselves as quiet and soft-spoken and even shy.And they all took the spotlight, even though every bone in their bodies was telling them not to.And this turns out to have a special power all its own, because people could feel that these leaders were at the helm,not because they enjoyed directing others and not out of the pleasure of being looked at;they were there because they had no choice, because they were driven to do what they thought was right.Now I think at this point it's important for me to say that I actually love extroverts.I always like to say some of my best friends are extroverts, including my beloved husband.And we all fall at different points, of course, along the introvert/extrovert spectrum.Even Carl Jung, the psychologist who first popularized these terms, said that there's no such thing as a pure introvert or a pure extrovert.He said that such a man would be in a lunatic asylum, if he existed at all.And some people fall smack in the middle of the introvert/extrovert spectrum,and we call these people ambiverts.And I often think that they have the best of all worlds.But many of us do recognize ourselves as one type or the other.And what I'm saying is that culturally we need a much better balance.We need more of a yin and yang between these two types.This is especially important when it comes to creativity and to productivity, because when psychologists look at the lives of the most creative people, what they find are people who are very good at exchanging ideas and advancing ideas, but who also have a serious streak of introversion in them.And this is because solitude is a crucial ingredient often to creativity.So Darwin, he took long walks alone in the woods and emphatically turned down dinner party invitations.Theodor Geisel, better known as Dr.Seuss, he dreamed up many of his amazing creationsin a lonely bell tower office that he had in the back of his house in La Jolla, California.And he was actually afraid to meet the young children who read his books for fear that they were expecting him this kind of jolly Santa Claus-like figure and would be disappointed with his more reserved persona.Steve Wozniak invented the first Apple computer sitting alone in his cubical in Hewlett-Packard where he was working at the time.And he says that he never would have become such an expert in the first place had he not been too introverted to leave the house when he was growing up.Now of course, this does not mean that we should all stop collaborating--and case in point, is Steve Wozniak famously coming together with Steve Jobs to start Apple Computer--but it does mean that solitude matters and that for some people it is the air that they breathe.And in fact, we have known for centuries about the transcendent power of solitude.It's only recently that we've strangely begun to forget it.If you look at most of the world's major religions, you will find seekers--Moses, Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad--seekers who are going off by themselves alone to the wilderness where they then have profound epiphanies and revelations that they then bring back to the rest of the community.So no wilderness, no revelations.TED 演講稿

This is no surprise though if you look at the insights of contemporary psychology.It turns out that we can't even be in a group of people without instinctively mirroring, mimicking their opinions.Even about seemingly personal and visceral things like who you're attracted to,you will start aping the beliefs of the people around you without even realizing that that's what you're doing.And groups famously follow the opinions of the most dominant or charismatic person in the room, even though there's zero correlation between being the best talker and having the best ideas--I mean zero.So...(Laughter)You might be following the person with the best ideas, but you might not.And do you really want to leave it up to chance? Much better for everybody to go off by themselves, generate their own ideas freed from the distortions of group dynamics, and then come together as a team to talk them through in a well-managed environment and take it from there.Now if all this is true, then why are we getting it so wrong? Why are we setting up our schools this way and our workplaces? And why are we making these introverts feel so guiltyabout wanting to just go off by themselves some of the time? One answer lies deep in our cultural history.Western societies, and in particular the U.S., have always favored the man of action over the man of contemplation and “man” of contemplation.But in America's early days, we lived in what historians call a culture of character, where we still, at that point, valued people for their inner selves and their moral rectitude.And if you look at the self-help books from this era, they all had titles with things like “Character, the Grandest Thing in the World.” And they featured role models like Abraham Lincoln who was praised for being modest and unassuming.Ralph Waldo Emerson called him “A man who does not offend by superiority.” But then we hit the 20th century and we entered a new culture that historians call the culture of personality.What happened is we had evolved an agricultural economy to a world of big business.And so suddenly people are moving from small towns to the cities.And instead of working alongside people they've known all their lives, now they are having to prove themselves in a crowd of strangers.So, quite understandably, qualities like magnetism and charisma suddenly come to seem really important.And sure enough, the self-help books change to meet these new needs and they start to have names like “How to Win Friends and Influence People.” And they feature as their role models really great salesmen.So that's the world we're living in today.That's our cultural inheritance.Now none of this is to say that social skills are unimportant, and I'm also not calling for the abolishing of teamwork at all.The same religions who send their sages off to lonely mountain tops also teach us love and trust.And the problems that we are facing today in fields like science and in economics are so vast and so complex that we are going to need armies of people coming together to solve them working together.But I am saying that the more freedom that we give introverts to be themselves, the more likely that they are to come up with their own unique solutions to these problems.So now I'd like to share with you what's in my suitcase today.Guess what? Books.I have a suitcase full of books.Here's Margaret Atwood, “Cat's Eye.” Here's a novel by Milan Kundera.And here's “The Guide for the Perplexed” by Maimonides.But these are not exactly

TED 演講稿

my books.I brought these books with me because they were written by my grandfather's favorite authors.My grandfather was a rabbi and he was a widower who lived alone in a small apartment in Brooklyn that was my favorite place in the world when I was growing up, partly because it was filled with his very gentle, very courtly presence and partly because it was filled with books.I mean literally every table, every chair in this apartment had yielded its original function to now serve as a surface for swaying stacks of books.Just like the rest of my family, my grandfather's favorite thing to do in the whole world was to read.But he also loved his congregation, and you could feel this love in the sermons that he gaveevery week for the 62 years that he was a rabbi.He would takes the fruits of each week's reading and he would weave these intricate tapestries of ancient and humanist thought.And people would come from all over to hear him speak.But here's the thing about my grandfather.Underneath this ceremonial role, he was really modest and really introverted--so much so that when he delivered these sermons, he had trouble making eye contact with the very same congregation that he had been speaking to for 62 years.And even away from the podium, when you called him to say hello, he would often end the conversation prematurely for fear that he was taking up too much of your time.But when he died at the age of 94, the police had to close down the streets of his neighborhood to accommodate the crowd of people who came out to mourn him.And so these days I try to learn from my grandfather's example in my own way.So I just published a book about introversion, and it took me about seven years to write.And for me, that seven years was like total bliss, because I was reading, I was writing, I was thinking, I was researching.It was my version of my grandfather's hours of the day alone in his library.But now all of a sudden my job is very different, and my job is to be out here talking about it, talking about introversion.(Laughter)And that's a lot harder for me, because as honored as I am to be here with all of you right now, this is not my natural milieu.So I prepared for moments like these as best I could.I spent the last year practicing public speaking every chance I could get.And I call this my “year of speaking dangerously.”(Laughter)And that actually helped a lot.But I'll tell you, what helps even more is my sense, my belief, my hope that when it comes to our attitudes to introversion and to quiet and to solitude, we truly are poised on the brink on dramatic change.I mean, we are.And so I am going to leave you now with three calls for action for those who share this vision.Number one: Stop the madness for constant group work.Just stop it.(Laughter)Thank you.(Applause)And I want to be clear about what I'm saying, because I deeply believe our offices should be encouraging casual, chatty cafe-style types of interactions--you know, the kind where people come together and serendipitously have an exchange of ideas.That is great.It's great for introverts and it's great for extroverts.But we need much more privacy and much more freedom and much more autonomy at work.School, same thing.We need to be

TED 演講稿

teaching kids to work together, for sure, but we also need to be teaching them how to work on their own.This is especially important for extroverted children too.They need to work on their own because that is where deep thought comes from in part.Okay, number two: Go to the wilderness.Be like Buddha, have your own revelations.I'm not saying that we all have to now go off and build our own cabins in the woods and never talk to each other again, but I am saying that we could all stand to unplug and get inside our own heads a little more often.Number three: Take a good look at what's inside your own suitcase and why you put it there.So extroverts, maybe your suitcases are also full of books.Or maybe they're full of champagne glasses or skydiving equipment.Whatever it is, I hope you take these things out every chance you get and grace us with your energy and your joy.But introverts, you being you, you probably have the impulse to guard very carefully what's inside your own suitcase.And that's okay.But occasionally, just occasionally, I hope you will open up your suitcases for other people to see, because the world needs you and it needs the things you carry.So I wish you the best of all possible journeys and the courage to speak softly.Thank you very much.(Applause)Thank you.Thank you.(Applause)

第四篇：一個成功戒酒者的心聲

一個成功戒酒者的心聲

黃某 浙江 溫州 個體戶 男 28歲因經(jīng)商工作壓力大，長期飲酒，每天1天左右，不喝就心理煩躁，記憶力減退，反應(yīng)遲鈍，固大便干燥、夜出盜汗、營養(yǎng)差、消瘦無力、無法再搞經(jīng)營。

后有妻子陪同前來我院治療，一個療程狀況明顯減輕，不想喝酒，并能控制住自己喝酒的欲望，后又鞏固兩個療程，徹底戒除了酒癮，身體狀況完全康復(fù)，至此在也五復(fù)飲。

詳情可以查看：http://

第五篇：一個一線施工者的感受

一個一線施工者的幾點感受

2015年12月16日

我畢業(yè)后回選擇到老家，至今,已在中建三局的區(qū)域分公司干了四年半的施工。接到文馨的訊息時，剛剛輾轉(zhuǎn)至職業(yè)生涯的第三個項目。當(dāng)時回答的斬釘截鐵，內(nèi)心卻是誠惶誠恐。所以只能結(jié)合自己的經(jīng)歷來寫，片面膚淺但真實。

行業(yè)整體發(fā)展態(tài)勢趨緩。

2011年畢業(yè)后的第一個項目，位于這座省會城市正開疆拓土的新區(qū)。當(dāng)我們項目第一臺塔式起重機豎起來的時候，我們就是中心。而兩年后，我站在我建的樓頂數(shù)了一下，周圍立起了100多臺塔式起重機。

2014年，轉(zhuǎn)折突然就來了。雖然公司產(chǎn)值數(shù)據(jù)依舊不斷攀升，但領(lǐng)導(dǎo)講話時開始頻繁提到受大環(huán)境的影響，項目上員工的流動也開始變緩。

惡意競爭引發(fā)惡性循環(huán)。

項目數(shù)量銳減，可能是真的受到大環(huán)境的影響，也可能是大環(huán)境下常態(tài)本就如此，部分業(yè)主招標(biāo)條款愈加苛刻。特別是部分工程招標(biāo)過程中不合理的工期壓縮，資金墊付等成了中標(biāo)單位惡意競爭的砝碼。

以犧牲部分利益換來的中標(biāo)成果，不僅給現(xiàn)場施工帶來更大的阻力，也大大增加了中標(biāo)單位的履約風(fēng)險，陷入項目少還難干的怪圈。

拼命扎堆高大精尖工程。

雖有武漢綠地中心等超高層拔地而起，但被拔高的城市天際線，依舊絕大多數(shù)位于沿海城市?？蛇@并不代表內(nèi)地就沒有野心，只是囿于地質(zhì)環(huán)境和某個時期內(nèi)資本環(huán)境的因素罷了。

如今，發(fā)展中的內(nèi)陸城市也在向沿海城市靠攏：不斷被刷新的地標(biāo)、大體量的商業(yè)中心，尖端科技含量的辦公大樓等陸續(xù)誕生。當(dāng)然，這也是具有實力的企業(yè)所期盼的，畢竟來說，幾乎透明的房建市場已無大利可圖。

總承包管理將是大勢所趨。

項目的體量和高度都在不斷增加，施工工藝的復(fù)雜程度也在扶搖直上，總承包管理的口號也喊了十幾年甚至更長的時間，但一直以來，從國家建設(shè)管理的相關(guān)部門、到業(yè)主單位、再到施工單位，都是喊得多干得少。

但隨著競爭日益加劇，部分企業(yè)已開始踏上總承包管理的探索之路。相信在兩年之后，總承包管理將會在深化設(shè)計、計劃管理、科技創(chuàng)新、分包協(xié)調(diào)、公共資源管理、項目信息管理等方面探索出一條成功之道。

大領(lǐng)導(dǎo)講話時說過：“我們這個行業(yè)，過去十年的常態(tài)已成往事，未來新常態(tài)到底怎樣，到目前為止還很模糊”。但可以肯定的是，光是靠多接項目，人海戰(zhàn)術(shù)的施工常態(tài)即將成為歷史。唯有靠科技創(chuàng)新、管理創(chuàng)新、服務(wù)創(chuàng)新才能真正意義上創(chuàng)效，同時也帶動這個行業(yè)的發(fā)展，形成新的、良性的競爭模式。